Contradictory Reforms: When NCLB Undermines Charter School Innovation
The article discusses how instead of being parts of a concerted educational reform effort, No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and the development of charter schools are in fact contradictory initiatives. Basing itself on a theoretical framework that brings together issues inherent to outcome-based school...
Autor principal: | Peter Clyde Martin |
---|---|
Formato: | Artículo |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Arizona State University
2015-03-01
|
Colección: | Current Issues in Education |
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/1346 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Corrective Action in Low Performing Schools: Lessons for NCLB Implementation from First-generation Accountability Systems. Vol. 13 No. 48
por: Heinrich Mintrop, et al.
Publicado: (2005-12-01) -
High-Stakes Testing and Student Achievement: Does Accountability Pressure Increase Student Learning?
por: Sharon L. Nichols, et al.
Publicado: (2006-01-01) -
The Imperative of the School Choice Option of NCLB: In Whose Interest?
por: Teri Jones
Publicado: (2015-06-01) -
The 25% Solution: Improving Instruction by Improving the NCLB Test
por: Steven L. Kramer
Publicado: (2007-03-01) -
The impact of language and high-stakes testing policies on elementary school English language learners in Arizona.
por: Wayne E. Wright, et al.
Publicado: (2006-05-01)