Variance in brain volume with advancing age: implications for defining the limits of normality.
Statistical models of normal ageing brain tissue volumes may support earlier diagnosis of increasingly common, yet still fatal, neurodegenerative diseases. For example, the statistically defined distribution of normal ageing brain tissue volumes may be used as a reference to assess patient volumes....
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2013-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3868601?pdf=render |
| _version_ | 1819238101668593664 |
|---|---|
| author | David Alexander Dickie Dominic E Job David Rodriguez Gonzalez Susan D Shenkin Trevor S Ahearn Alison D Murray Joanna M Wardlaw |
| author_facet | David Alexander Dickie Dominic E Job David Rodriguez Gonzalez Susan D Shenkin Trevor S Ahearn Alison D Murray Joanna M Wardlaw |
| author_sort | David Alexander Dickie |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Statistical models of normal ageing brain tissue volumes may support earlier diagnosis of increasingly common, yet still fatal, neurodegenerative diseases. For example, the statistically defined distribution of normal ageing brain tissue volumes may be used as a reference to assess patient volumes. To date, such models were often derived from mean values which were assumed to represent the distributions and boundaries, i.e. percentile ranks, of brain tissue volume. Since it was previously unknown, the objective of the present study was to determine if this assumption was robust, i.e. whether regression models derived from mean values accurately represented the distributions and boundaries of brain tissue volume at older ages.We acquired T1-w magnetic resonance (MR) brain images of 227 normal and 219 Alzheimer's disease (AD) subjects (aged 55-89 years) from publicly available databanks. Using nonlinear regression within both samples, we compared mean and percentile rank estimates of whole brain tissue volume by age.In both the normal and AD sample, mean regression estimates of brain tissue volume often did not accurately represent percentile rank estimates (errors=-74% to 75%). In the normal sample, mean estimates generally underestimated differences in brain volume at percentile ranks below the mean. Conversely, in the AD sample, mean estimates generally underestimated differences in brain volume at percentile ranks above the mean. Differences between ages at the 5(th) percentile rank of normal subjects were ~39% greater than mean differences in the AD subjects.While more data are required to make true population inferences, our results indicate that mean regression estimates may not accurately represent the distributions of ageing brain tissue volumes. This suggests that percentile rank estimates will be required to robustly define the limits of brain tissue volume in normal ageing and neurodegenerative disease. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-23T13:30:52Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-4e42302775f243aab73eb4cfe18ca408 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-23T13:30:52Z |
| publishDate | 2013-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-4e42302775f243aab73eb4cfe18ca4082022-12-21T17:45:10ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-01812e8409310.1371/journal.pone.0084093Variance in brain volume with advancing age: implications for defining the limits of normality.David Alexander DickieDominic E JobDavid Rodriguez GonzalezSusan D ShenkinTrevor S AhearnAlison D MurrayJoanna M WardlawStatistical models of normal ageing brain tissue volumes may support earlier diagnosis of increasingly common, yet still fatal, neurodegenerative diseases. For example, the statistically defined distribution of normal ageing brain tissue volumes may be used as a reference to assess patient volumes. To date, such models were often derived from mean values which were assumed to represent the distributions and boundaries, i.e. percentile ranks, of brain tissue volume. Since it was previously unknown, the objective of the present study was to determine if this assumption was robust, i.e. whether regression models derived from mean values accurately represented the distributions and boundaries of brain tissue volume at older ages.We acquired T1-w magnetic resonance (MR) brain images of 227 normal and 219 Alzheimer's disease (AD) subjects (aged 55-89 years) from publicly available databanks. Using nonlinear regression within both samples, we compared mean and percentile rank estimates of whole brain tissue volume by age.In both the normal and AD sample, mean regression estimates of brain tissue volume often did not accurately represent percentile rank estimates (errors=-74% to 75%). In the normal sample, mean estimates generally underestimated differences in brain volume at percentile ranks below the mean. Conversely, in the AD sample, mean estimates generally underestimated differences in brain volume at percentile ranks above the mean. Differences between ages at the 5(th) percentile rank of normal subjects were ~39% greater than mean differences in the AD subjects.While more data are required to make true population inferences, our results indicate that mean regression estimates may not accurately represent the distributions of ageing brain tissue volumes. This suggests that percentile rank estimates will be required to robustly define the limits of brain tissue volume in normal ageing and neurodegenerative disease.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3868601?pdf=render |
| spellingShingle | David Alexander Dickie Dominic E Job David Rodriguez Gonzalez Susan D Shenkin Trevor S Ahearn Alison D Murray Joanna M Wardlaw Variance in brain volume with advancing age: implications for defining the limits of normality. PLoS ONE |
| title | Variance in brain volume with advancing age: implications for defining the limits of normality. |
| title_full | Variance in brain volume with advancing age: implications for defining the limits of normality. |
| title_fullStr | Variance in brain volume with advancing age: implications for defining the limits of normality. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Variance in brain volume with advancing age: implications for defining the limits of normality. |
| title_short | Variance in brain volume with advancing age: implications for defining the limits of normality. |
| title_sort | variance in brain volume with advancing age implications for defining the limits of normality |
| url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3868601?pdf=render |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT davidalexanderdickie varianceinbrainvolumewithadvancingageimplicationsfordefiningthelimitsofnormality AT dominicejob varianceinbrainvolumewithadvancingageimplicationsfordefiningthelimitsofnormality AT davidrodriguezgonzalez varianceinbrainvolumewithadvancingageimplicationsfordefiningthelimitsofnormality AT susandshenkin varianceinbrainvolumewithadvancingageimplicationsfordefiningthelimitsofnormality AT trevorsahearn varianceinbrainvolumewithadvancingageimplicationsfordefiningthelimitsofnormality AT alisondmurray varianceinbrainvolumewithadvancingageimplicationsfordefiningthelimitsofnormality AT joannamwardlaw varianceinbrainvolumewithadvancingageimplicationsfordefiningthelimitsofnormality |