Race, Language, and the Passive Voice: Hardship narratives in U.S. Social Studies Textbooks from 1860 to the present

While United States historians’ inclination to write in affect-inducing ways has waxed and waned throughout the past 150 years, racial biases concerning such writing have persisted through today. Adapting Mark Phillips’ (2013) concept of historical distance coupled with a form of linguistic analysis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jeremy Jimenez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Journal of Social Studies Education Research 2020-06-01
Series:Journal of Social Studies Education Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jsser.org/index.php/jsser/article/view/2002
_version_ 1797905517428867072
author Jeremy Jimenez
author_facet Jeremy Jimenez
author_sort Jeremy Jimenez
collection DOAJ
description While United States historians’ inclination to write in affect-inducing ways has waxed and waned throughout the past 150 years, racial biases concerning such writing have persisted through today. Adapting Mark Phillips’ (2013) concept of historical distance coupled with a form of linguistic analysis known as stylistics, I examine 50 U.S. history textbooks from 1860 to 2016 in order to analyze which individuals and groups are discussed as experiencing sufferin­g and whether or not these hardship narratives are apt to elicit compassion from their readers.  I find that textbooks published after the Civil War consistently contain discourses that encourage readers to be concerned with the welfare of elites and whites, at first exclusively focusing on white elites’ hardships and then eventually including all whites. At the same time, these texts consistently neglect to acknowledge the hardship experiences of domestic marginalized groups and, when textbooks do discuss their hardships, their narrative style is likely to limit readers’ capacity to have concern for their oppression. Specifically, I find that the most enduring textbook writing characteristic for U.S. textbook authors from the mid-19th century through the present day is to discuss acts of violence by non-white groups using the active voice while describing violence by white Americans towards non-whites in the passive voice, which impacts readers’ capacity to recall and empathize with the hardship narratives. Understanding how history textbooks continue to propagate these selective uses of compassionate discourses has significant implications for understanding and addressing not only history instruction, but for contemporary civil rights struggles as well.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T10:07:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4f469a9b0bd34221ace69c42b12896bb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1309-9108
1309-9108
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T10:07:49Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher Journal of Social Studies Education Research
record_format Article
series Journal of Social Studies Education Research
spelling doaj.art-4f469a9b0bd34221ace69c42b12896bb2023-02-15T16:22:24ZengJournal of Social Studies Education ResearchJournal of Social Studies Education Research1309-91081309-91082020-06-01112126446Race, Language, and the Passive Voice: Hardship narratives in U.S. Social Studies Textbooks from 1860 to the presentJeremy Jimenez0State University of New York (SUNY) at CortlandWhile United States historians’ inclination to write in affect-inducing ways has waxed and waned throughout the past 150 years, racial biases concerning such writing have persisted through today. Adapting Mark Phillips’ (2013) concept of historical distance coupled with a form of linguistic analysis known as stylistics, I examine 50 U.S. history textbooks from 1860 to 2016 in order to analyze which individuals and groups are discussed as experiencing sufferin­g and whether or not these hardship narratives are apt to elicit compassion from their readers.  I find that textbooks published after the Civil War consistently contain discourses that encourage readers to be concerned with the welfare of elites and whites, at first exclusively focusing on white elites’ hardships and then eventually including all whites. At the same time, these texts consistently neglect to acknowledge the hardship experiences of domestic marginalized groups and, when textbooks do discuss their hardships, their narrative style is likely to limit readers’ capacity to have concern for their oppression. Specifically, I find that the most enduring textbook writing characteristic for U.S. textbook authors from the mid-19th century through the present day is to discuss acts of violence by non-white groups using the active voice while describing violence by white Americans towards non-whites in the passive voice, which impacts readers’ capacity to recall and empathize with the hardship narratives. Understanding how history textbooks continue to propagate these selective uses of compassionate discourses has significant implications for understanding and addressing not only history instruction, but for contemporary civil rights struggles as well.https://jsser.org/index.php/jsser/article/view/2002social studies textbooksracismlanguageempathyhistorical distance
spellingShingle Jeremy Jimenez
Race, Language, and the Passive Voice: Hardship narratives in U.S. Social Studies Textbooks from 1860 to the present
Journal of Social Studies Education Research
social studies textbooks
racism
language
empathy
historical distance
title Race, Language, and the Passive Voice: Hardship narratives in U.S. Social Studies Textbooks from 1860 to the present
title_full Race, Language, and the Passive Voice: Hardship narratives in U.S. Social Studies Textbooks from 1860 to the present
title_fullStr Race, Language, and the Passive Voice: Hardship narratives in U.S. Social Studies Textbooks from 1860 to the present
title_full_unstemmed Race, Language, and the Passive Voice: Hardship narratives in U.S. Social Studies Textbooks from 1860 to the present
title_short Race, Language, and the Passive Voice: Hardship narratives in U.S. Social Studies Textbooks from 1860 to the present
title_sort race language and the passive voice hardship narratives in u s social studies textbooks from 1860 to the present
topic social studies textbooks
racism
language
empathy
historical distance
url https://jsser.org/index.php/jsser/article/view/2002
work_keys_str_mv AT jeremyjimenez racelanguageandthepassivevoicehardshipnarrativesinussocialstudiestextbooksfrom1860tothepresent