In vitro and in silico parameters for precise cgMLST typing of Listeria monocytogenes

Abstract Background Whole genome sequencing analyzed by core genome multi-locus sequence typing (cgMLST) is widely used in surveillance of the pathogenic bacteria Listeria monocytogenes. Given the heterogeneity of available bioinformatics tools to define cgMLST alleles, our aim was to identify param...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Federica Palma, Iolanda Mangone, Anna Janowicz, Alexandra Moura, Alexandra Chiaverini, Marina Torresi, Giuliano Garofolo, Alexis Criscuolo, Sylvain Brisse, Adriano Di Pasquale, Cesare Cammà, Nicolas Radomski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-03-01
Series:BMC Genomics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08437-4
_version_ 1818774379848269824
author Federica Palma
Iolanda Mangone
Anna Janowicz
Alexandra Moura
Alexandra Chiaverini
Marina Torresi
Giuliano Garofolo
Alexis Criscuolo
Sylvain Brisse
Adriano Di Pasquale
Cesare Cammà
Nicolas Radomski
author_facet Federica Palma
Iolanda Mangone
Anna Janowicz
Alexandra Moura
Alexandra Chiaverini
Marina Torresi
Giuliano Garofolo
Alexis Criscuolo
Sylvain Brisse
Adriano Di Pasquale
Cesare Cammà
Nicolas Radomski
author_sort Federica Palma
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Whole genome sequencing analyzed by core genome multi-locus sequence typing (cgMLST) is widely used in surveillance of the pathogenic bacteria Listeria monocytogenes. Given the heterogeneity of available bioinformatics tools to define cgMLST alleles, our aim was to identify parameters influencing the precision of cgMLST profiles. Methods We used three L. monocytogenes reference genomes from different phylogenetic lineages and assessed the impact of in vitro (i.e. tested genomes, successive platings, replicates of DNA extraction and sequencing) and in silico parameters (i.e. targeted depth of coverage, depth of coverage, breadth of coverage, assembly metrics, cgMLST workflows, cgMLST completeness) on cgMLST precision made of 1748 core loci. Six cgMLST workflows were tested, comprising assembly-based (BIGSdb, INNUENDO, GENPAT, SeqSphere and BioNumerics) and assembly-free (i.e. kmer-based MentaLiST) allele callers. Principal component analyses and generalized linear models were used to identify the most impactful parameters on cgMLST precision. Results The isolate’s genetic background, cgMLST workflows, cgMLST completeness, as well as depth and breadth of coverage were the parameters that impacted most on cgMLST precision (i.e. identical alleles against reference circular genomes). All workflows performed well at ≥40X of depth of coverage, with high loci detection (> 99.54% for all, except for BioNumerics with 97.78%) and showed consistent cluster definitions using the reference cut-off of ≤7 allele differences. Conclusions This highlights that bioinformatics workflows dedicated to cgMLST allele calling are largely robust when paired-end reads are of high quality and when the sequencing depth is ≥40X.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T10:40:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-517b19c87103476982e268e47d85dc95
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2164
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T10:40:13Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Genomics
spelling doaj.art-517b19c87103476982e268e47d85dc952022-12-21T21:10:40ZengBMCBMC Genomics1471-21642022-03-0123112410.1186/s12864-022-08437-4In vitro and in silico parameters for precise cgMLST typing of Listeria monocytogenesFederica Palma0Iolanda Mangone1Anna Janowicz2Alexandra Moura3Alexandra Chiaverini4Marina Torresi5Giuliano Garofolo6Alexis Criscuolo7Sylvain Brisse8Adriano Di Pasquale9Cesare Cammà10Nicolas Radomski11Institut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Biological Resources Center of Institut PasteurIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell’Abruzzo e del Molise “Giuseppe Caporale” (IZSAM), National Reference Centre (NRC) for Whole Genome Sequencing of microbial pathogens: data-base and bioinformatics analysis (GENPAT)Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell’Abruzzo e del Molise “Giuseppe Caporale” (IZSAM), Bacteriology UnitInstitut Pasteur, National Reference Center and WHO Collaborating Center ListeriaIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell’Abruzzo e del Molise “Giuseppe Caporale” (IZSAM), National Reference Labororatory (LNR) for Listeria monocytogenesIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell’Abruzzo e del Molise “Giuseppe Caporale” (IZSAM), National Reference Labororatory (LNR) for Listeria monocytogenesIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell’Abruzzo e del Molise “Giuseppe Caporale” (IZSAM), Bacteriology UnitInstitut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Bioinformatics and Biostatistics HubInstitut Pasteur, Université de Paris, Biological Resources Center of Institut PasteurIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell’Abruzzo e del Molise “Giuseppe Caporale” (IZSAM), National Reference Centre (NRC) for Whole Genome Sequencing of microbial pathogens: data-base and bioinformatics analysis (GENPAT)Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell’Abruzzo e del Molise “Giuseppe Caporale” (IZSAM), National Reference Centre (NRC) for Whole Genome Sequencing of microbial pathogens: data-base and bioinformatics analysis (GENPAT)Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell’Abruzzo e del Molise “Giuseppe Caporale” (IZSAM), National Reference Centre (NRC) for Whole Genome Sequencing of microbial pathogens: data-base and bioinformatics analysis (GENPAT)Abstract Background Whole genome sequencing analyzed by core genome multi-locus sequence typing (cgMLST) is widely used in surveillance of the pathogenic bacteria Listeria monocytogenes. Given the heterogeneity of available bioinformatics tools to define cgMLST alleles, our aim was to identify parameters influencing the precision of cgMLST profiles. Methods We used three L. monocytogenes reference genomes from different phylogenetic lineages and assessed the impact of in vitro (i.e. tested genomes, successive platings, replicates of DNA extraction and sequencing) and in silico parameters (i.e. targeted depth of coverage, depth of coverage, breadth of coverage, assembly metrics, cgMLST workflows, cgMLST completeness) on cgMLST precision made of 1748 core loci. Six cgMLST workflows were tested, comprising assembly-based (BIGSdb, INNUENDO, GENPAT, SeqSphere and BioNumerics) and assembly-free (i.e. kmer-based MentaLiST) allele callers. Principal component analyses and generalized linear models were used to identify the most impactful parameters on cgMLST precision. Results The isolate’s genetic background, cgMLST workflows, cgMLST completeness, as well as depth and breadth of coverage were the parameters that impacted most on cgMLST precision (i.e. identical alleles against reference circular genomes). All workflows performed well at ≥40X of depth of coverage, with high loci detection (> 99.54% for all, except for BioNumerics with 97.78%) and showed consistent cluster definitions using the reference cut-off of ≤7 allele differences. Conclusions This highlights that bioinformatics workflows dedicated to cgMLST allele calling are largely robust when paired-end reads are of high quality and when the sequencing depth is ≥40X.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08437-4cgMLSTComparability of workflowsListeria monocytogenesPrincipal component analysisGeneralized linear model
spellingShingle Federica Palma
Iolanda Mangone
Anna Janowicz
Alexandra Moura
Alexandra Chiaverini
Marina Torresi
Giuliano Garofolo
Alexis Criscuolo
Sylvain Brisse
Adriano Di Pasquale
Cesare Cammà
Nicolas Radomski
In vitro and in silico parameters for precise cgMLST typing of Listeria monocytogenes
BMC Genomics
cgMLST
Comparability of workflows
Listeria monocytogenes
Principal component analysis
Generalized linear model
title In vitro and in silico parameters for precise cgMLST typing of Listeria monocytogenes
title_full In vitro and in silico parameters for precise cgMLST typing of Listeria monocytogenes
title_fullStr In vitro and in silico parameters for precise cgMLST typing of Listeria monocytogenes
title_full_unstemmed In vitro and in silico parameters for precise cgMLST typing of Listeria monocytogenes
title_short In vitro and in silico parameters for precise cgMLST typing of Listeria monocytogenes
title_sort in vitro and in silico parameters for precise cgmlst typing of listeria monocytogenes
topic cgMLST
Comparability of workflows
Listeria monocytogenes
Principal component analysis
Generalized linear model
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08437-4
work_keys_str_mv AT federicapalma invitroandinsilicoparametersforprecisecgmlsttypingoflisteriamonocytogenes
AT iolandamangone invitroandinsilicoparametersforprecisecgmlsttypingoflisteriamonocytogenes
AT annajanowicz invitroandinsilicoparametersforprecisecgmlsttypingoflisteriamonocytogenes
AT alexandramoura invitroandinsilicoparametersforprecisecgmlsttypingoflisteriamonocytogenes
AT alexandrachiaverini invitroandinsilicoparametersforprecisecgmlsttypingoflisteriamonocytogenes
AT marinatorresi invitroandinsilicoparametersforprecisecgmlsttypingoflisteriamonocytogenes
AT giulianogarofolo invitroandinsilicoparametersforprecisecgmlsttypingoflisteriamonocytogenes
AT alexiscriscuolo invitroandinsilicoparametersforprecisecgmlsttypingoflisteriamonocytogenes
AT sylvainbrisse invitroandinsilicoparametersforprecisecgmlsttypingoflisteriamonocytogenes
AT adrianodipasquale invitroandinsilicoparametersforprecisecgmlsttypingoflisteriamonocytogenes
AT cesarecamma invitroandinsilicoparametersforprecisecgmlsttypingoflisteriamonocytogenes
AT nicolasradomski invitroandinsilicoparametersforprecisecgmlsttypingoflisteriamonocytogenes