Interventionist vs. interactionist models of dynamic assessment (DA) in the EFL classroom: impacts on speaking accuracy and fluency (SAF), foreign language classroom anxiety (FLCA), and foreign language learning motivation (FLLM)

Abstract In spite of their pivotal role in language learning, psychological variables involved in language learning have received less attention in empirical research. Therefore, this paper tried to inspect the effects of interventionist DA, interactionist DA, and non-DA on EFL students’ SAF, FLCA,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mahyudin Ritonga, Fariba Farhangi, Bemnet Ajanil, Ayman Farid Khafaga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2022-10-01
Series:Language Testing in Asia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00195-0
_version_ 1811200879091515392
author Mahyudin Ritonga
Fariba Farhangi
Bemnet Ajanil
Ayman Farid Khafaga
author_facet Mahyudin Ritonga
Fariba Farhangi
Bemnet Ajanil
Ayman Farid Khafaga
author_sort Mahyudin Ritonga
collection DOAJ
description Abstract In spite of their pivotal role in language learning, psychological variables involved in language learning have received less attention in empirical research. Therefore, this paper tried to inspect the effects of interventionist DA, interactionist DA, and non-DA on EFL students’ SAF, FLCA, and FLLM. To achieve this goal, 78 respondents were chosen and randomly separated into three groups: EG1 (interactionist DA), EG2 (interventionist DA), and CG (non-DA). Before starting the treatment, the participants’ SAF, FLCA, and FLCM were checked through three related pretests. As the treatment, the non-DA students were given specific topics, and they were asked to discuss them without any DA-oriented interventions. The EG1 was evaluated and provided with the needed help by interaction-oriented DA techniques, whereas the EG2 was trained by DA-oriented instruction following Lantolf and Poehner’s (Language Teaching Research 15: 11–33, 2011) scales to measure and aid the students’ speaking ability in their discussions. At the end of the study, the post-tests of SAF, FLCA, and FLLM were administered to check the impacts of the treatment. Analyzing the data through one-way ANOVA tests, it was revealed the two models of DA (i.e., interactionist and interventionist) had a significant positive effect on EFL learners’ SAF. Moreover, it was revealed that both DA models not only increased the EFL learners’ motivation but also lowered their FLCA. This research has multiple implications for both EFL learners and teachers.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T02:11:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-51e79545acee4e85873a41c95d50734b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2229-0443
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T02:11:05Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Language Testing in Asia
spelling doaj.art-51e79545acee4e85873a41c95d50734b2022-12-22T03:52:23ZengSpringerOpenLanguage Testing in Asia2229-04432022-10-0112112110.1186/s40468-022-00195-0Interventionist vs. interactionist models of dynamic assessment (DA) in the EFL classroom: impacts on speaking accuracy and fluency (SAF), foreign language classroom anxiety (FLCA), and foreign language learning motivation (FLLM)Mahyudin Ritonga0Fariba Farhangi1Bemnet Ajanil2Ayman Farid Khafaga3Muhammadiyah University of West SumatraDepartment of English Language and Literature, Khazar UniversityBahir Dar UniversityDepartment of English, College of Science and Humanities, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz UniversityAbstract In spite of their pivotal role in language learning, psychological variables involved in language learning have received less attention in empirical research. Therefore, this paper tried to inspect the effects of interventionist DA, interactionist DA, and non-DA on EFL students’ SAF, FLCA, and FLLM. To achieve this goal, 78 respondents were chosen and randomly separated into three groups: EG1 (interactionist DA), EG2 (interventionist DA), and CG (non-DA). Before starting the treatment, the participants’ SAF, FLCA, and FLCM were checked through three related pretests. As the treatment, the non-DA students were given specific topics, and they were asked to discuss them without any DA-oriented interventions. The EG1 was evaluated and provided with the needed help by interaction-oriented DA techniques, whereas the EG2 was trained by DA-oriented instruction following Lantolf and Poehner’s (Language Teaching Research 15: 11–33, 2011) scales to measure and aid the students’ speaking ability in their discussions. At the end of the study, the post-tests of SAF, FLCA, and FLLM were administered to check the impacts of the treatment. Analyzing the data through one-way ANOVA tests, it was revealed the two models of DA (i.e., interactionist and interventionist) had a significant positive effect on EFL learners’ SAF. Moreover, it was revealed that both DA models not only increased the EFL learners’ motivation but also lowered their FLCA. This research has multiple implications for both EFL learners and teachers.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00195-0DAInteractionist DAInterventionist DASpeaking accuracySpeaking fluencyFLCA
spellingShingle Mahyudin Ritonga
Fariba Farhangi
Bemnet Ajanil
Ayman Farid Khafaga
Interventionist vs. interactionist models of dynamic assessment (DA) in the EFL classroom: impacts on speaking accuracy and fluency (SAF), foreign language classroom anxiety (FLCA), and foreign language learning motivation (FLLM)
Language Testing in Asia
DA
Interactionist DA
Interventionist DA
Speaking accuracy
Speaking fluency
FLCA
title Interventionist vs. interactionist models of dynamic assessment (DA) in the EFL classroom: impacts on speaking accuracy and fluency (SAF), foreign language classroom anxiety (FLCA), and foreign language learning motivation (FLLM)
title_full Interventionist vs. interactionist models of dynamic assessment (DA) in the EFL classroom: impacts on speaking accuracy and fluency (SAF), foreign language classroom anxiety (FLCA), and foreign language learning motivation (FLLM)
title_fullStr Interventionist vs. interactionist models of dynamic assessment (DA) in the EFL classroom: impacts on speaking accuracy and fluency (SAF), foreign language classroom anxiety (FLCA), and foreign language learning motivation (FLLM)
title_full_unstemmed Interventionist vs. interactionist models of dynamic assessment (DA) in the EFL classroom: impacts on speaking accuracy and fluency (SAF), foreign language classroom anxiety (FLCA), and foreign language learning motivation (FLLM)
title_short Interventionist vs. interactionist models of dynamic assessment (DA) in the EFL classroom: impacts on speaking accuracy and fluency (SAF), foreign language classroom anxiety (FLCA), and foreign language learning motivation (FLLM)
title_sort interventionist vs interactionist models of dynamic assessment da in the efl classroom impacts on speaking accuracy and fluency saf foreign language classroom anxiety flca and foreign language learning motivation fllm
topic DA
Interactionist DA
Interventionist DA
Speaking accuracy
Speaking fluency
FLCA
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00195-0
work_keys_str_mv AT mahyudinritonga interventionistvsinteractionistmodelsofdynamicassessmentdaintheeflclassroomimpactsonspeakingaccuracyandfluencysafforeignlanguageclassroomanxietyflcaandforeignlanguagelearningmotivationfllm
AT faribafarhangi interventionistvsinteractionistmodelsofdynamicassessmentdaintheeflclassroomimpactsonspeakingaccuracyandfluencysafforeignlanguageclassroomanxietyflcaandforeignlanguagelearningmotivationfllm
AT bemnetajanil interventionistvsinteractionistmodelsofdynamicassessmentdaintheeflclassroomimpactsonspeakingaccuracyandfluencysafforeignlanguageclassroomanxietyflcaandforeignlanguagelearningmotivationfllm
AT aymanfaridkhafaga interventionistvsinteractionistmodelsofdynamicassessmentdaintheeflclassroomimpactsonspeakingaccuracyandfluencysafforeignlanguageclassroomanxietyflcaandforeignlanguagelearningmotivationfllm