Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and Roflumilast Involvement in IPF Progression

The ECM propagates processes in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), leading to progressive lung scarring. We established an IPF-conditioned matrix (IPF-CM) system as a platform for testing drug candidates. Here, we tested the involvement of a PGE2 and PDE4 inhibitor, Roflumilast, in the IPF-CM syst...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Noa Moshkovitz, Gali Epstein Shochet, David Shitrit
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-08-01
Series:International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/15/12393
_version_ 1797586597341822976
author Noa Moshkovitz
Gali Epstein Shochet
David Shitrit
author_facet Noa Moshkovitz
Gali Epstein Shochet
David Shitrit
author_sort Noa Moshkovitz
collection DOAJ
description The ECM propagates processes in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), leading to progressive lung scarring. We established an IPF-conditioned matrix (IPF-CM) system as a platform for testing drug candidates. Here, we tested the involvement of a PGE2 and PDE4 inhibitor, Roflumilast, in the IPF-CM system. Primary normal/IPF tissue-derived human lung fibroblasts (N/IPF-HLFs) were cultured on Matrigel and then removed to create the IPF-CM. N-HLFs were exposed to the IPF-CM/N-CM with/without PGE2 (1 nM) and Roflumilast (1 µM) for 24 h. The effect of the IPF-CM on cell phenotype and pro-fibrotic gene expression was tested. In addition, electronic records of 107 patients with up to 15-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were defined as slow/rapid progressors using forced vital capacity (FVC) annual decline. Medication exposure was examined. N-HLFs cultured on IPF-CM were arranged in large aggregates as a result of increased proliferation, migration and differentiation. A PGE2 and Roflumilast combination blocked the large aggregate formation induced by the IPF-CM (<i>p</i> < 0.001) as well as cell migration, proliferation, and pro-fibrotic gene expression. A review of patient records showed that significantly more slow-progressing patients were exposed to NSAIDs (<i>p</i> = 0.003). PGE2/PDE4 signaling may be involved in IPF progression. These findings should be further studied.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T00:25:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-567b92c41e2a4db09d461733aab79cba
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1661-6596
1422-0067
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T00:25:22Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series International Journal of Molecular Sciences
spelling doaj.art-567b92c41e2a4db09d461733aab79cba2023-11-18T23:04:26ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences1661-65961422-00672023-08-0124151239310.3390/ijms241512393Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and Roflumilast Involvement in IPF ProgressionNoa Moshkovitz0Gali Epstein Shochet1David Shitrit2Pulmonary Department, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba 44281, IsraelPulmonary Department, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba 44281, IsraelPulmonary Department, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba 44281, IsraelThe ECM propagates processes in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), leading to progressive lung scarring. We established an IPF-conditioned matrix (IPF-CM) system as a platform for testing drug candidates. Here, we tested the involvement of a PGE2 and PDE4 inhibitor, Roflumilast, in the IPF-CM system. Primary normal/IPF tissue-derived human lung fibroblasts (N/IPF-HLFs) were cultured on Matrigel and then removed to create the IPF-CM. N-HLFs were exposed to the IPF-CM/N-CM with/without PGE2 (1 nM) and Roflumilast (1 µM) for 24 h. The effect of the IPF-CM on cell phenotype and pro-fibrotic gene expression was tested. In addition, electronic records of 107 patients with up to 15-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were defined as slow/rapid progressors using forced vital capacity (FVC) annual decline. Medication exposure was examined. N-HLFs cultured on IPF-CM were arranged in large aggregates as a result of increased proliferation, migration and differentiation. A PGE2 and Roflumilast combination blocked the large aggregate formation induced by the IPF-CM (<i>p</i> < 0.001) as well as cell migration, proliferation, and pro-fibrotic gene expression. A review of patient records showed that significantly more slow-progressing patients were exposed to NSAIDs (<i>p</i> = 0.003). PGE2/PDE4 signaling may be involved in IPF progression. These findings should be further studied.https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/15/12393IPFPGE2Roflumilastextracellular matrixfibroblast
spellingShingle Noa Moshkovitz
Gali Epstein Shochet
David Shitrit
Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and Roflumilast Involvement in IPF Progression
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
IPF
PGE2
Roflumilast
extracellular matrix
fibroblast
title Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and Roflumilast Involvement in IPF Progression
title_full Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and Roflumilast Involvement in IPF Progression
title_fullStr Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and Roflumilast Involvement in IPF Progression
title_full_unstemmed Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and Roflumilast Involvement in IPF Progression
title_short Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and Roflumilast Involvement in IPF Progression
title_sort prostaglandin e2 pge2 and roflumilast involvement in ipf progression
topic IPF
PGE2
Roflumilast
extracellular matrix
fibroblast
url https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/15/12393
work_keys_str_mv AT noamoshkovitz prostaglandine2pge2androflumilastinvolvementinipfprogression
AT galiepsteinshochet prostaglandine2pge2androflumilastinvolvementinipfprogression
AT davidshitrit prostaglandine2pge2androflumilastinvolvementinipfprogression