How Expert and Inexpert Instructors Talk about Teaching

Using mixed-method social network analysis, we explored the discussions happening between instructors within a teaching-related network and how instructional expertise correlated with the content of those discussions. Instructional expertise, defined by the extent to which effective teaching practic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tracie Reding, Christopher Moore
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-06-01
Series:Education Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/13/6/591
_version_ 1827737662045290496
author Tracie Reding
Christopher Moore
author_facet Tracie Reding
Christopher Moore
author_sort Tracie Reding
collection DOAJ
description Using mixed-method social network analysis, we explored the discussions happening between instructors within a teaching-related network and how instructional expertise correlated with the content of those discussions. Instructional expertise, defined by the extent to which effective teaching practices were implemented, was measured for 82 faculty teaching at a Midwestern research university in the USA using the Faculty Inventory of Methods and Practices Associated with Competent Teaching (F-IMPACT). Eight instructors from this population were interviewed after being selected from a stratified random sample having varied disciplines, positions, years of teaching experience, number of network alters, and quartile F-IMPACT score. Network Canvas was used to design, capture, and export network data during the interview process, and a deductive qualitative analysis approach was used for coding and analysis. In general, expert instructors had larger networks that also consisted of expert alters and greater frequency of discussions throughout the semester (both formal and informal) and participated in discussions centered around best practices and education research. Inexpert instructors had smaller teaching networks that consisted of other inexpert instructors, lower frequency of interactions, and had discussions that centered around sharing course-specific, surface-level advice.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T02:33:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-57f7c46a35b94c4c9c174b3ca724f1dd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-7102
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T02:33:37Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Education Sciences
spelling doaj.art-57f7c46a35b94c4c9c174b3ca724f1dd2023-11-18T10:06:27ZengMDPI AGEducation Sciences2227-71022023-06-0113659110.3390/educsci13060591How Expert and Inexpert Instructors Talk about TeachingTracie Reding0Christopher Moore1Parlay Consulting, Omaha, NE 68118, USAPhysics Department, University of Nebraska Omaha, Omaha, NE 68182, USAUsing mixed-method social network analysis, we explored the discussions happening between instructors within a teaching-related network and how instructional expertise correlated with the content of those discussions. Instructional expertise, defined by the extent to which effective teaching practices were implemented, was measured for 82 faculty teaching at a Midwestern research university in the USA using the Faculty Inventory of Methods and Practices Associated with Competent Teaching (F-IMPACT). Eight instructors from this population were interviewed after being selected from a stratified random sample having varied disciplines, positions, years of teaching experience, number of network alters, and quartile F-IMPACT score. Network Canvas was used to design, capture, and export network data during the interview process, and a deductive qualitative analysis approach was used for coding and analysis. In general, expert instructors had larger networks that also consisted of expert alters and greater frequency of discussions throughout the semester (both formal and informal) and participated in discussions centered around best practices and education research. Inexpert instructors had smaller teaching networks that consisted of other inexpert instructors, lower frequency of interactions, and had discussions that centered around sharing course-specific, surface-level advice.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/13/6/591social network analysisevidence-based teaching practicesdiffusioninstructional expertiseinstitutional changeinstructional change
spellingShingle Tracie Reding
Christopher Moore
How Expert and Inexpert Instructors Talk about Teaching
Education Sciences
social network analysis
evidence-based teaching practices
diffusion
instructional expertise
institutional change
instructional change
title How Expert and Inexpert Instructors Talk about Teaching
title_full How Expert and Inexpert Instructors Talk about Teaching
title_fullStr How Expert and Inexpert Instructors Talk about Teaching
title_full_unstemmed How Expert and Inexpert Instructors Talk about Teaching
title_short How Expert and Inexpert Instructors Talk about Teaching
title_sort how expert and inexpert instructors talk about teaching
topic social network analysis
evidence-based teaching practices
diffusion
instructional expertise
institutional change
instructional change
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/13/6/591
work_keys_str_mv AT traciereding howexpertandinexpertinstructorstalkaboutteaching
AT christophermoore howexpertandinexpertinstructorstalkaboutteaching