ESSENTIALISM MAKES FOR STRANGE BEDMATES: THE SUPREME COURT CASE OF J.A. AND THE INTERVENTION OF L.E.A.F.
In the recent case of R. v J.A, the majority of the Supreme Court of Canada determined that an unconscious person could not consent in advance to sexual touching. This paper reviews the majority reasoning and questions whether the intervention of the Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund [LEAF] pe...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Windsor
2012-02-01
|
| Series: | The Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice |
| Online Access: | https://wyaj.uwindsor.ca/index.php/wyaj/article/view/4361 |