Provocation and Localization of Arrhythmogenic Triggers from Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Background: Although pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an established procedure for atrial fibrillation (AF), non-PV foci play a crucial role in AF recurrence. Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) has been reported as critical non-PV foci. However, the effectiveness of provocation of AF trigge...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kentaro Minami, Kohki Nakamura, Eiko Maeno, Keitaro Iida, Ikuta Saito, Taiki Masuyama, Yoshiyuki Kitagawa, Toshiaki Nakajima, Yosuke Nakatani, Shigeto Naito, Shigeru Toyoda, Milan Chovanec, Jan Petrů, Jan Škoda, Koji Kumagai, Petr Neužil
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-02-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/5/1783
_version_ 1797615020058607616
author Kentaro Minami
Kohki Nakamura
Eiko Maeno
Keitaro Iida
Ikuta Saito
Taiki Masuyama
Yoshiyuki Kitagawa
Toshiaki Nakajima
Yosuke Nakatani
Shigeto Naito
Shigeru Toyoda
Milan Chovanec
Jan Petrů
Jan Škoda
Koji Kumagai
Petr Neužil
author_facet Kentaro Minami
Kohki Nakamura
Eiko Maeno
Keitaro Iida
Ikuta Saito
Taiki Masuyama
Yoshiyuki Kitagawa
Toshiaki Nakajima
Yosuke Nakatani
Shigeto Naito
Shigeru Toyoda
Milan Chovanec
Jan Petrů
Jan Škoda
Koji Kumagai
Petr Neužil
author_sort Kentaro Minami
collection DOAJ
description Background: Although pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an established procedure for atrial fibrillation (AF), non-PV foci play a crucial role in AF recurrence. Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) has been reported as critical non-PV foci. However, the effectiveness of provocation of AF triggers from PLSVC remains unclear. This study was designed to validate the usefulness of provoking AF triggers from PLSVC. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 37 patients with AF and PLSVC. To provoke triggers, AF was cardioverted, and re-initiation of AF was monitored under high-dose isoproterenol infusion. The patients were divided into two groups: those whose PLSVC had arrhythmogenic triggers initiating AF (Group A) and those whose PLSVC did not have triggers (Group B). Group A underwent isolation of PLSVC after PVI. Group B received PVI only. Results: Group A had 14 patients, whereas Group B had 23 patients. After a 3-year follow-up, no difference in the success rate for maintaining sinus rhythm was observed between the two groups. Group A was significantly younger and had lower CHADS2-VASc scores than Group B. Conclusions: The provocation of arrhythmogenic triggers from PLSVC was effective for the ablation strategy. PLSVC electrical isolation would not be necessary if arrhythmogenic triggers are not provoked.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T07:20:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5ee28772e7204cb39b2a77858e43c793
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T07:20:33Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-5ee28772e7204cb39b2a77858e43c7932023-11-17T07:58:16ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832023-02-01125178310.3390/jcm12051783Provocation and Localization of Arrhythmogenic Triggers from Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava in Patients with Atrial FibrillationKentaro Minami0Kohki Nakamura1Eiko Maeno2Keitaro Iida3Ikuta Saito4Taiki Masuyama5Yoshiyuki Kitagawa6Toshiaki Nakajima7Yosuke Nakatani8Shigeto Naito9Shigeru Toyoda10Milan Chovanec11Jan Petrů12Jan Škoda13Koji Kumagai14Petr Neužil15Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu 321-0293, Tochigi, JapanGunma Prefectural Cardiovascular Center, Maebashi 371-0004, Gunma, JapanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu 321-0293, Tochigi, JapanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu 321-0293, Tochigi, JapanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu 321-0293, Tochigi, JapanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu 321-0293, Tochigi, JapanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu 321-0293, Tochigi, JapanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu 321-0293, Tochigi, JapanGunma Prefectural Cardiovascular Center, Maebashi 371-0004, Gunma, JapanGunma Prefectural Cardiovascular Center, Maebashi 371-0004, Gunma, JapanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu 321-0293, Tochigi, JapanDepartment of Cardiology, Na Homolce Hospital, 15030 Prague, Czech RepublicDepartment of Cardiology, Na Homolce Hospital, 15030 Prague, Czech RepublicDepartment of Cardiology, Na Homolce Hospital, 15030 Prague, Czech RepublicDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai 983-8536, Miyagi, JapanDepartment of Cardiology, Na Homolce Hospital, 15030 Prague, Czech RepublicBackground: Although pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an established procedure for atrial fibrillation (AF), non-PV foci play a crucial role in AF recurrence. Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) has been reported as critical non-PV foci. However, the effectiveness of provocation of AF triggers from PLSVC remains unclear. This study was designed to validate the usefulness of provoking AF triggers from PLSVC. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 37 patients with AF and PLSVC. To provoke triggers, AF was cardioverted, and re-initiation of AF was monitored under high-dose isoproterenol infusion. The patients were divided into two groups: those whose PLSVC had arrhythmogenic triggers initiating AF (Group A) and those whose PLSVC did not have triggers (Group B). Group A underwent isolation of PLSVC after PVI. Group B received PVI only. Results: Group A had 14 patients, whereas Group B had 23 patients. After a 3-year follow-up, no difference in the success rate for maintaining sinus rhythm was observed between the two groups. Group A was significantly younger and had lower CHADS2-VASc scores than Group B. Conclusions: The provocation of arrhythmogenic triggers from PLSVC was effective for the ablation strategy. PLSVC electrical isolation would not be necessary if arrhythmogenic triggers are not provoked.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/5/1783persistent left superior vena cavaatrial fibrillationcatheter ablation
spellingShingle Kentaro Minami
Kohki Nakamura
Eiko Maeno
Keitaro Iida
Ikuta Saito
Taiki Masuyama
Yoshiyuki Kitagawa
Toshiaki Nakajima
Yosuke Nakatani
Shigeto Naito
Shigeru Toyoda
Milan Chovanec
Jan Petrů
Jan Škoda
Koji Kumagai
Petr Neužil
Provocation and Localization of Arrhythmogenic Triggers from Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
Journal of Clinical Medicine
persistent left superior vena cava
atrial fibrillation
catheter ablation
title Provocation and Localization of Arrhythmogenic Triggers from Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
title_full Provocation and Localization of Arrhythmogenic Triggers from Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
title_fullStr Provocation and Localization of Arrhythmogenic Triggers from Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Provocation and Localization of Arrhythmogenic Triggers from Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
title_short Provocation and Localization of Arrhythmogenic Triggers from Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
title_sort provocation and localization of arrhythmogenic triggers from persistent left superior vena cava in patients with atrial fibrillation
topic persistent left superior vena cava
atrial fibrillation
catheter ablation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/5/1783
work_keys_str_mv AT kentarominami provocationandlocalizationofarrhythmogenictriggersfrompersistentleftsuperiorvenacavainpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT kohkinakamura provocationandlocalizationofarrhythmogenictriggersfrompersistentleftsuperiorvenacavainpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT eikomaeno provocationandlocalizationofarrhythmogenictriggersfrompersistentleftsuperiorvenacavainpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT keitaroiida provocationandlocalizationofarrhythmogenictriggersfrompersistentleftsuperiorvenacavainpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT ikutasaito provocationandlocalizationofarrhythmogenictriggersfrompersistentleftsuperiorvenacavainpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT taikimasuyama provocationandlocalizationofarrhythmogenictriggersfrompersistentleftsuperiorvenacavainpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT yoshiyukikitagawa provocationandlocalizationofarrhythmogenictriggersfrompersistentleftsuperiorvenacavainpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT toshiakinakajima provocationandlocalizationofarrhythmogenictriggersfrompersistentleftsuperiorvenacavainpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT yosukenakatani provocationandlocalizationofarrhythmogenictriggersfrompersistentleftsuperiorvenacavainpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT shigetonaito provocationandlocalizationofarrhythmogenictriggersfrompersistentleftsuperiorvenacavainpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT shigerutoyoda provocationandlocalizationofarrhythmogenictriggersfrompersistentleftsuperiorvenacavainpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT milanchovanec provocationandlocalizationofarrhythmogenictriggersfrompersistentleftsuperiorvenacavainpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT janpetru provocationandlocalizationofarrhythmogenictriggersfrompersistentleftsuperiorvenacavainpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT janskoda provocationandlocalizationofarrhythmogenictriggersfrompersistentleftsuperiorvenacavainpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT kojikumagai provocationandlocalizationofarrhythmogenictriggersfrompersistentleftsuperiorvenacavainpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT petrneuzil provocationandlocalizationofarrhythmogenictriggersfrompersistentleftsuperiorvenacavainpatientswithatrialfibrillation