Mindfulness-Based Mobile Apps and Their Impact on Well-Being in Nonclinical Populations: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
BackgroundMindfulness-based mobile apps have become popular tools for enhancing well-being in today’s fast-paced world. Their ability to reduce geographical, financial, and social barriers makes them a promising alternative to traditional interventions. ObjectiveA...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2023-08-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| Online Access: | https://www.jmir.org/2023/1/e44638 |
| _version_ | 1797754518503424000 |
|---|---|
| author | Katrin Schwartz Fabienne Marie Ganster Ulrich S Tran |
| author_facet | Katrin Schwartz Fabienne Marie Ganster Ulrich S Tran |
| author_sort | Katrin Schwartz |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
BackgroundMindfulness-based mobile apps have become popular tools for enhancing well-being in today’s fast-paced world. Their ability to reduce geographical, financial, and social barriers makes them a promising alternative to traditional interventions.
ObjectiveAs most available apps lack a theoretical framework, this review aimed to evaluate their effectiveness and assess their quality. We expected to find small sample sizes, high dropout rates, and small effect sizes in the included studies.
MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted using PsycInfo, PsycNet, PubMed, an institutional search engine (u:search), and Google Scholar. Randomized controlled trials assessing the impact of mobile mindfulness apps on well-being in nonclinical samples were included. Study selection, risk of bias (using the version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials), and reporting quality (using selected CONSORT [Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials] statement criteria) assessments were performed by 2 authors independently and discussed until a consensus was reached.
ResultsThe 28 included randomized controlled trials differed in well-being measures, apps, and intervention duration (7 to 56 days; median duration 28 days). A wide range of sample sizes (12 to 2282; median 161) and attrition rates (0% to 84.7%; median rate 23.4%) were observed. Most studies (19/28, 68%) reported positive effects on at least one aspect of well-being. The effects were presented using different metrics but were primarily small or small to medium in size. Overall risk of bias was mostly high.
ConclusionsThe wide range of sample sizes, attrition rates, and intervention periods and the variation in well-being measures and mobile apps contributed to the limited comparability of the studies. Although most studies (16/28, 57%) reported small or small to medium effects for at least one well-being outcome, this review demonstrates that the generalizability of the results is limited. Further research is needed to obtain more consistent conclusions regarding the impact of mindfulness-based mobile apps on well-being in nonclinical populations. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T17:33:38Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-60c4d9c7a472473fb2ec98a110858079 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1438-8871 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T17:33:38Z |
| publishDate | 2023-08-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-60c4d9c7a472473fb2ec98a1108580792023-08-04T14:00:47ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712023-08-0125e4463810.2196/44638Mindfulness-Based Mobile Apps and Their Impact on Well-Being in Nonclinical Populations: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled TrialsKatrin Schwartzhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3329-3757Fabienne Marie Gansterhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8758-6531Ulrich S Tranhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6589-3167 BackgroundMindfulness-based mobile apps have become popular tools for enhancing well-being in today’s fast-paced world. Their ability to reduce geographical, financial, and social barriers makes them a promising alternative to traditional interventions. ObjectiveAs most available apps lack a theoretical framework, this review aimed to evaluate their effectiveness and assess their quality. We expected to find small sample sizes, high dropout rates, and small effect sizes in the included studies. MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted using PsycInfo, PsycNet, PubMed, an institutional search engine (u:search), and Google Scholar. Randomized controlled trials assessing the impact of mobile mindfulness apps on well-being in nonclinical samples were included. Study selection, risk of bias (using the version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials), and reporting quality (using selected CONSORT [Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials] statement criteria) assessments were performed by 2 authors independently and discussed until a consensus was reached. ResultsThe 28 included randomized controlled trials differed in well-being measures, apps, and intervention duration (7 to 56 days; median duration 28 days). A wide range of sample sizes (12 to 2282; median 161) and attrition rates (0% to 84.7%; median rate 23.4%) were observed. Most studies (19/28, 68%) reported positive effects on at least one aspect of well-being. The effects were presented using different metrics but were primarily small or small to medium in size. Overall risk of bias was mostly high. ConclusionsThe wide range of sample sizes, attrition rates, and intervention periods and the variation in well-being measures and mobile apps contributed to the limited comparability of the studies. Although most studies (16/28, 57%) reported small or small to medium effects for at least one well-being outcome, this review demonstrates that the generalizability of the results is limited. Further research is needed to obtain more consistent conclusions regarding the impact of mindfulness-based mobile apps on well-being in nonclinical populations.https://www.jmir.org/2023/1/e44638 |
| spellingShingle | Katrin Schwartz Fabienne Marie Ganster Ulrich S Tran Mindfulness-Based Mobile Apps and Their Impact on Well-Being in Nonclinical Populations: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| title | Mindfulness-Based Mobile Apps and Their Impact on Well-Being in Nonclinical Populations: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials |
| title_full | Mindfulness-Based Mobile Apps and Their Impact on Well-Being in Nonclinical Populations: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials |
| title_fullStr | Mindfulness-Based Mobile Apps and Their Impact on Well-Being in Nonclinical Populations: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials |
| title_full_unstemmed | Mindfulness-Based Mobile Apps and Their Impact on Well-Being in Nonclinical Populations: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials |
| title_short | Mindfulness-Based Mobile Apps and Their Impact on Well-Being in Nonclinical Populations: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials |
| title_sort | mindfulness based mobile apps and their impact on well being in nonclinical populations systematic review of randomized controlled trials |
| url | https://www.jmir.org/2023/1/e44638 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT katrinschwartz mindfulnessbasedmobileappsandtheirimpactonwellbeinginnonclinicalpopulationssystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT fabiennemarieganster mindfulnessbasedmobileappsandtheirimpactonwellbeinginnonclinicalpopulationssystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT ulrichstran mindfulnessbasedmobileappsandtheirimpactonwellbeinginnonclinicalpopulationssystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |