Principles and framework for assessing the risk of bias for studies included in comparative quantitative environmental systematic reviews

Principles and framework for assessing the risk of bias for studies included in comparative quantitative environmental systematic reviews

Abstract The internal validity of conclusions about effectiveness or impact in systematic reviews, and of decisions based on them, depends on risk of bias assessments being conducted appropriately. However, a random sample of 50 recently-published articles claiming to be quantitative environmental s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Geoff Frampton, Paul Whaley, Micah Bennett, Gary Bilotta, Jean-Lou C. M. Dorne, Jacqualyn Eales, Katy James, Christian Kohl, Magnus Land, Barbara Livoreil, David Makowski, Evans Muchiri, Gillian Petrokofsky, Nicola Randall, Kate Schofield
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-03-01
Series:Environmental Evidence
Subjects:
Validity
Bias
Risk of bias
Systematic error
Internal validity
External validity
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-022-00264-0

Internet

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-022-00264-0

Similar Items