Inferential Rationality and Internalistic Scarecrows
Abstract In a recent paper, Manuel Pérez Otero attempted to turn the tables on Paul Boghossian's claim that content externalism is incompatible with the 'a priority of our logical abilities'. In reply, Boghossian argued that Pérez Otero's criticism misses the main point of his ar...
| Yazar: | |
|---|---|
| Materyal Türü: | Makale |
| Dil: | English |
| Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
|
| Seri Bilgileri: | Manuscrito |
| Konular: | |
| Online Erişim: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452015000300005&lng=en&tlng=en |
| Özet: | Abstract In a recent paper, Manuel Pérez Otero attempted to turn the tables on Paul Boghossian's claim that content externalism is incompatible with the 'a priority of our logical abilities'. In reply, Boghossian argued that Pérez Otero's criticism misses the main point of his argument through concentrating on the semantics of singular (as opposed to general) terms. I elaborate on Boghossian's reply by showing that even taken on its own terms Pérez Otero's paper fails to engage with internalism through systematically misrepresenting what a truly internalistic account of the semantics of singular terms should be. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2317-630X |