“It’s Still an Animal that Died for Me.” Responsibility and Meat Consumption
The aim of this paper is to explore the way people engaging in a more or less strict reduction of their consumption of food of animal origin (de)construct their responsibility regarding the food production and distribution system. Starting from a description of the crisis in meat production, it cont...
Main Author: | Fabienne Gfeller |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
PsychOpen GOLD/ Leibniz Institute for Psychology
2019-12-01
|
Series: | Europe's Journal of Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ejop.psychopen.eu/article/view/1854 |
Similar Items
-
Editorial: Reducing consumption of animal products
by: Christopher Bryant, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01) -
Meat consumption & positive mental health: A scoping review
by: Urska Dobersek, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Reduce by How Much? Calibrating Meat Reduction Appeals to Maximize Their Effectiveness
by: Sophie Cameron, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01) -
Comparing meat abstainers with avid meat eaters and committed meat reducers
by: Muriel C. D. Verain, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01) -
The Place of Meat in Dietary Policy: An Exploration of the Animal/Plant Divide
by: Adele H. Hite, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01)