Affect in science communication: a data-driven analysis of TED Talks on YouTube
Abstract Science communication is evolving: Increasingly, it is directed at the public rather than academic peers. Understanding the circumstances under which the public engages with scientific content is therefore crucial to improving science communication. In this article, we investigate the role...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Springer Nature
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | Humanities & Social Sciences Communications |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02247-z |
| _version_ | 1827382341067079680 |
|---|---|
| author | Olivia Fischer Loris T. Jeitziner Dirk U. Wulff |
| author_facet | Olivia Fischer Loris T. Jeitziner Dirk U. Wulff |
| author_sort | Olivia Fischer |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Science communication is evolving: Increasingly, it is directed at the public rather than academic peers. Understanding the circumstances under which the public engages with scientific content is therefore crucial to improving science communication. In this article, we investigate the role of affect on audience engagement with a modern form of science communication: TED Talks on the social media platform YouTube. We examined how two aspects of affect, valence and density are associated with public engagement with the talk in terms of popularity (reflecting views and likes) and polarity (reflecting dislikes and comments). We found that the valence of TED Talks was associated with both popularity and polarity: Positive valence was linked to higher talk popularity and lower talk polarity. Density, on the other hand, was only associated with popularity: Higher affective density was linked to higher popularity—even more so than valence—but not polarity. Moreover, the association between affect and engagement was moderated by talk topic, but not by whether the talk included scientific content. Our results establish affect as an important covariate of audience engagement with scientific content on social media, which science communicators may be able to leverage to steer engagement and increase reach. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T14:18:10Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-6b5cb806a7104ebf9cfbe859313ed030 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2662-9992 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T14:18:10Z |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | Springer Nature |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Humanities & Social Sciences Communications |
| spelling | doaj.art-6b5cb806a7104ebf9cfbe859313ed0302024-01-14T12:15:43ZengSpringer NatureHumanities & Social Sciences Communications2662-99922024-01-011111910.1057/s41599-023-02247-zAffect in science communication: a data-driven analysis of TED Talks on YouTubeOlivia Fischer0Loris T. Jeitziner1Dirk U. Wulff2University of ZurichUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern SwitzerlandUniversity of BaselAbstract Science communication is evolving: Increasingly, it is directed at the public rather than academic peers. Understanding the circumstances under which the public engages with scientific content is therefore crucial to improving science communication. In this article, we investigate the role of affect on audience engagement with a modern form of science communication: TED Talks on the social media platform YouTube. We examined how two aspects of affect, valence and density are associated with public engagement with the talk in terms of popularity (reflecting views and likes) and polarity (reflecting dislikes and comments). We found that the valence of TED Talks was associated with both popularity and polarity: Positive valence was linked to higher talk popularity and lower talk polarity. Density, on the other hand, was only associated with popularity: Higher affective density was linked to higher popularity—even more so than valence—but not polarity. Moreover, the association between affect and engagement was moderated by talk topic, but not by whether the talk included scientific content. Our results establish affect as an important covariate of audience engagement with scientific content on social media, which science communicators may be able to leverage to steer engagement and increase reach.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02247-z |
| spellingShingle | Olivia Fischer Loris T. Jeitziner Dirk U. Wulff Affect in science communication: a data-driven analysis of TED Talks on YouTube Humanities & Social Sciences Communications |
| title | Affect in science communication: a data-driven analysis of TED Talks on YouTube |
| title_full | Affect in science communication: a data-driven analysis of TED Talks on YouTube |
| title_fullStr | Affect in science communication: a data-driven analysis of TED Talks on YouTube |
| title_full_unstemmed | Affect in science communication: a data-driven analysis of TED Talks on YouTube |
| title_short | Affect in science communication: a data-driven analysis of TED Talks on YouTube |
| title_sort | affect in science communication a data driven analysis of ted talks on youtube |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02247-z |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT oliviafischer affectinsciencecommunicationadatadrivenanalysisoftedtalksonyoutube AT loristjeitziner affectinsciencecommunicationadatadrivenanalysisoftedtalksonyoutube AT dirkuwulff affectinsciencecommunicationadatadrivenanalysisoftedtalksonyoutube |