Quantification of the Effects of Electrical and CO<sub>2</sub> Stunning on Selected Quality Attributes of Fresh Pork: A Meta-Analysis

Stunning is a statutory pre-slaughter process that may affect the quality of pork. The objective of this study was quantification of the effects of stunning (ES vs. CO<sub>2</sub> stunning) on selected quality attributes of pork, using a meta-analytical approach. Data from 18 publication...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andrzej Zybert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-07-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/14/1811
_version_ 1797407835995242496
author Andrzej Zybert
author_facet Andrzej Zybert
author_sort Andrzej Zybert
collection DOAJ
description Stunning is a statutory pre-slaughter process that may affect the quality of pork. The objective of this study was quantification of the effects of stunning (ES vs. CO<sub>2</sub> stunning) on selected quality attributes of pork, using a meta-analytical approach. Data from 18 publications with 46 individual experiments were combined using a random-effect model to estimate the effect size of stunning on the initial and ultimate pH (pH<sub>1</sub>, pH<sub>u</sub>); drip loss (DL); colour (lightness—L*, redness—a*, yellowness—b*); and tenderness (expressed as Warner–Bratzler shear force, WBSF) of pork. In overall, loins from ES showed significantly lower pH<sub>1</sub> (by 0.08 units); greater DL (by 0.68 p.p.); higher L* (by 1.29 units); and a* (by 0.80 units) as they compared to those from CO<sub>2</sub> stunning. In subgroups, a greater-than-overall negative change in pH<sub>1</sub>, pH<sub>u</sub>, DL, L* and a* was detected with the application of the head-to-back (HB) stunning method. Additionally, alterations in DL and L* may be magnified with the application of conventional chilling (Conv.) to ES pigs. There was no effect of stunning on WBSF but, due to a low number of research in the database, the reliability of these results may be misleading. These results provide evidence that the differences between these two stunning methods in DL and L* may be diminished by the application of the head-only (HO) or head-to-body (HBO) method, followed by the fast chilling of carcasses.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T03:47:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6d1a696435d14b7883f1d97c2a7820f7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T03:47:23Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-6d1a696435d14b7883f1d97c2a7820f72023-12-03T14:31:53ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152022-07-011214181110.3390/ani12141811Quantification of the Effects of Electrical and CO<sub>2</sub> Stunning on Selected Quality Attributes of Fresh Pork: A Meta-AnalysisAndrzej Zybert0Faculty of Agrobioengineering and Animal Husbandry, Institute of Animal Science and Fisheries, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Prusa 14, 08-110 Siedlce, PolandStunning is a statutory pre-slaughter process that may affect the quality of pork. The objective of this study was quantification of the effects of stunning (ES vs. CO<sub>2</sub> stunning) on selected quality attributes of pork, using a meta-analytical approach. Data from 18 publications with 46 individual experiments were combined using a random-effect model to estimate the effect size of stunning on the initial and ultimate pH (pH<sub>1</sub>, pH<sub>u</sub>); drip loss (DL); colour (lightness—L*, redness—a*, yellowness—b*); and tenderness (expressed as Warner–Bratzler shear force, WBSF) of pork. In overall, loins from ES showed significantly lower pH<sub>1</sub> (by 0.08 units); greater DL (by 0.68 p.p.); higher L* (by 1.29 units); and a* (by 0.80 units) as they compared to those from CO<sub>2</sub> stunning. In subgroups, a greater-than-overall negative change in pH<sub>1</sub>, pH<sub>u</sub>, DL, L* and a* was detected with the application of the head-to-back (HB) stunning method. Additionally, alterations in DL and L* may be magnified with the application of conventional chilling (Conv.) to ES pigs. There was no effect of stunning on WBSF but, due to a low number of research in the database, the reliability of these results may be misleading. These results provide evidence that the differences between these two stunning methods in DL and L* may be diminished by the application of the head-only (HO) or head-to-body (HBO) method, followed by the fast chilling of carcasses.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/14/1811pigsstunningmeat qualitymeta-analysis
spellingShingle Andrzej Zybert
Quantification of the Effects of Electrical and CO<sub>2</sub> Stunning on Selected Quality Attributes of Fresh Pork: A Meta-Analysis
Animals
pigs
stunning
meat quality
meta-analysis
title Quantification of the Effects of Electrical and CO<sub>2</sub> Stunning on Selected Quality Attributes of Fresh Pork: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Quantification of the Effects of Electrical and CO<sub>2</sub> Stunning on Selected Quality Attributes of Fresh Pork: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Quantification of the Effects of Electrical and CO<sub>2</sub> Stunning on Selected Quality Attributes of Fresh Pork: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of the Effects of Electrical and CO<sub>2</sub> Stunning on Selected Quality Attributes of Fresh Pork: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Quantification of the Effects of Electrical and CO<sub>2</sub> Stunning on Selected Quality Attributes of Fresh Pork: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort quantification of the effects of electrical and co sub 2 sub stunning on selected quality attributes of fresh pork a meta analysis
topic pigs
stunning
meat quality
meta-analysis
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/12/14/1811
work_keys_str_mv AT andrzejzybert quantificationoftheeffectsofelectricalandcosub2substunningonselectedqualityattributesoffreshporkametaanalysis