Psychological and Gender Differences in a Simulated Cheating Coercion Situation at School

This study aimed to analyze gender, anxiety, and psychological inflexibility differences of high school students’ behaviors in a simulated situation of peer coercion into academic cheating. Method: A total of 1147 volunteer adolescents participated, (Men: N = 479; Mage = 16.3; Women: N = 668; Mage =...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marina Begoña Martínez-González, Claudia Patricia Arenas-Rivera, Aura Alicia Cardozo-Rusinque, Aldair Ricardo Morales-Cuadro, Mónica Acuña-Rodríguez, Yamile Turizo-Palencia, Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:Social Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/7/265
_version_ 1797525986968862720
author Marina Begoña Martínez-González
Claudia Patricia Arenas-Rivera
Aura Alicia Cardozo-Rusinque
Aldair Ricardo Morales-Cuadro
Mónica Acuña-Rodríguez
Yamile Turizo-Palencia
Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez
author_facet Marina Begoña Martínez-González
Claudia Patricia Arenas-Rivera
Aura Alicia Cardozo-Rusinque
Aldair Ricardo Morales-Cuadro
Mónica Acuña-Rodríguez
Yamile Turizo-Palencia
Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez
author_sort Marina Begoña Martínez-González
collection DOAJ
description This study aimed to analyze gender, anxiety, and psychological inflexibility differences of high school students’ behaviors in a simulated situation of peer coercion into academic cheating. Method: A total of 1147 volunteer adolescents participated, (Men: N = 479; Mage = 16.3; Women: N = 668; Mage = 16.2). The participants saw 15 s animated online video presenting peer coercion into an academic cheating situation, including a questionnaire about their reactions to face the situation. They also answered the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory for children and adolescents and the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y). Gender was associated with the behaviors facing the situation. Higher state anxiety and inflexibility were present in those participants that avoided aggressive behaviors facing the situation; on the other hand, trait anxiety was present in those who reacted aggressively. Finally, higher anxiety and inflexibility were associated with the used moral disengagement mechanisms, but also with peers’ perception as sanctioning or being against the participants’ decision. The most aggressive students were more flexible and less stressed than those who tried to solve assertively. Expectations about peers seem to be relevant to the decision-making facing moral dilemmas and peer victimization.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T09:23:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6f41e1fe97ba4c7e914629d67d6dfb4f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-0760
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T09:23:46Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Social Sciences
spelling doaj.art-6f41e1fe97ba4c7e914629d67d6dfb4f2023-11-22T04:58:50ZengMDPI AGSocial Sciences2076-07602021-07-0110726510.3390/socsci10070265Psychological and Gender Differences in a Simulated Cheating Coercion Situation at SchoolMarina Begoña Martínez-González0Claudia Patricia Arenas-Rivera1Aura Alicia Cardozo-Rusinque2Aldair Ricardo Morales-Cuadro3Mónica Acuña-Rodríguez4Yamile Turizo-Palencia5Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez6Department of Social Science, Universidad de la Costa, Barranquilla 080001, ColombiaDepartment of Social Science, Universidad de la Costa, Barranquilla 080001, ColombiaDepartment of Social Science, Universidad de la Costa, Barranquilla 080001, ColombiaDepartment of Social Science, Universidad de la Costa, Barranquilla 080001, ColombiaDepartment of Social Science, Universidad de la Costa, Barranquilla 080001, ColombiaDepartment of Social Science, Universidad de la Costa, Barranquilla 080001, ColombiaFaculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Villaviciosa de Odón, SpainThis study aimed to analyze gender, anxiety, and psychological inflexibility differences of high school students’ behaviors in a simulated situation of peer coercion into academic cheating. Method: A total of 1147 volunteer adolescents participated, (Men: N = 479; Mage = 16.3; Women: N = 668; Mage = 16.2). The participants saw 15 s animated online video presenting peer coercion into an academic cheating situation, including a questionnaire about their reactions to face the situation. They also answered the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory for children and adolescents and the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y). Gender was associated with the behaviors facing the situation. Higher state anxiety and inflexibility were present in those participants that avoided aggressive behaviors facing the situation; on the other hand, trait anxiety was present in those who reacted aggressively. Finally, higher anxiety and inflexibility were associated with the used moral disengagement mechanisms, but also with peers’ perception as sanctioning or being against the participants’ decision. The most aggressive students were more flexible and less stressed than those who tried to solve assertively. Expectations about peers seem to be relevant to the decision-making facing moral dilemmas and peer victimization.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/7/265peer victimizationmoral disengagementbullyingdisruptive behavior
spellingShingle Marina Begoña Martínez-González
Claudia Patricia Arenas-Rivera
Aura Alicia Cardozo-Rusinque
Aldair Ricardo Morales-Cuadro
Mónica Acuña-Rodríguez
Yamile Turizo-Palencia
Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez
Psychological and Gender Differences in a Simulated Cheating Coercion Situation at School
Social Sciences
peer victimization
moral disengagement
bullying
disruptive behavior
title Psychological and Gender Differences in a Simulated Cheating Coercion Situation at School
title_full Psychological and Gender Differences in a Simulated Cheating Coercion Situation at School
title_fullStr Psychological and Gender Differences in a Simulated Cheating Coercion Situation at School
title_full_unstemmed Psychological and Gender Differences in a Simulated Cheating Coercion Situation at School
title_short Psychological and Gender Differences in a Simulated Cheating Coercion Situation at School
title_sort psychological and gender differences in a simulated cheating coercion situation at school
topic peer victimization
moral disengagement
bullying
disruptive behavior
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/7/265
work_keys_str_mv AT marinabegonamartinezgonzalez psychologicalandgenderdifferencesinasimulatedcheatingcoercionsituationatschool
AT claudiapatriciaarenasrivera psychologicalandgenderdifferencesinasimulatedcheatingcoercionsituationatschool
AT auraaliciacardozorusinque psychologicalandgenderdifferencesinasimulatedcheatingcoercionsituationatschool
AT aldairricardomoralescuadro psychologicalandgenderdifferencesinasimulatedcheatingcoercionsituationatschool
AT monicaacunarodriguez psychologicalandgenderdifferencesinasimulatedcheatingcoercionsituationatschool
AT yamileturizopalencia psychologicalandgenderdifferencesinasimulatedcheatingcoercionsituationatschool
AT vicentejavierclementesuarez psychologicalandgenderdifferencesinasimulatedcheatingcoercionsituationatschool