Nice to Have – or Need to Have?

The present article argues that despite the considerable development and expansion of strategic communication as both an academic field and professional practice during the 20th century, strategic communication continues to have an ambiguous status in academia as well as professionally. The article...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kristensen Nete Nørgaard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2010-11-01
Series:Nordicom Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0134
Description
Summary:The present article argues that despite the considerable development and expansion of strategic communication as both an academic field and professional practice during the 20th century, strategic communication continues to have an ambiguous status in academia as well as professionally. The article argues for two related explanations of this ambiguity: 1) a communication-internal perspective concerning the interdisciplinary, practice-based and semi-professional nature of strategic communication, and 2) a communication-external perspective concerning the integration of and priority given to strategic communication in organizations. Both aspects constantly challenge the effectiveness, position and power of communication employees, making it necessary for them to continuously prove their worth – in relation to other professionals, in times of crisis, etc. Strategic communication in the Danish public sector is included as an empirical example, as communication practitioners, especially in this context, seem to be faced with professional challenges not least related to the organizational (external) setting, but also based on the (internal) nature of strategic communication.
ISSN:2001-5119