Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education

This article explores whether intersectional praxis can be discerned in the provision of disability/accessibility resources in higher education in Sweden and the United States. Analysing interviews with administrative staff based on hypothetical scenarios (vignettes) that could qualify as situations...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marie Sépulchre
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2023-12-01
Series:Social Inclusion
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/7085
_version_ 1797404181503410176
author Marie Sépulchre
author_facet Marie Sépulchre
author_sort Marie Sépulchre
collection DOAJ
description This article explores whether intersectional praxis can be discerned in the provision of disability/accessibility resources in higher education in Sweden and the United States. Analysing interviews with administrative staff based on hypothetical scenarios (vignettes) that could qualify as situations of disability discrimination, this article identifies several situations of (missed) opportunities for intersectional praxis. It then proceeds with a discussion of participants’ conceptions of disability and organisational possibilities for collaborations with other offices at their university or college. Although opportunities for intersectional praxis are generally absent or missed in both countries, the article argues that American participants were closer to such critical praxis because they tended to consider disability in terms of barriers and as a structural issue, and advocated for the recognition of disability as diversity. By contrast, the Swedish participants seemed further away from an intersectional praxis because they tended to view disability as a difficulty that requires individualised support measures and as a situational issue regarding the learning environment. The article proposes that these differences are connected to differences regarding disability and anti‐discrimination politics in both countries. In the US, disability politics have been characterised by a civil rights and social justice approach, while in Sweden disability politics have been conceived in terms of welfare services and a relational approach to disability. This article concludes that the conception of intersectionality as a critical praxis offers an original lens to gain new insights into how disability inclusion is promoted in different contexts.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T02:51:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-707d5d52ac76473d92afb5e299a32a62
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2183-2803
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T02:51:13Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Cogitatio
record_format Article
series Social Inclusion
spelling doaj.art-707d5d52ac76473d92afb5e299a32a622023-12-05T10:44:37ZengCogitatioSocial Inclusion2183-28032023-12-0111436237210.17645/si.v11i4.70853217Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher EducationMarie Sépulchre0School of Social Work, Lund University, SwedenThis article explores whether intersectional praxis can be discerned in the provision of disability/accessibility resources in higher education in Sweden and the United States. Analysing interviews with administrative staff based on hypothetical scenarios (vignettes) that could qualify as situations of disability discrimination, this article identifies several situations of (missed) opportunities for intersectional praxis. It then proceeds with a discussion of participants’ conceptions of disability and organisational possibilities for collaborations with other offices at their university or college. Although opportunities for intersectional praxis are generally absent or missed in both countries, the article argues that American participants were closer to such critical praxis because they tended to consider disability in terms of barriers and as a structural issue, and advocated for the recognition of disability as diversity. By contrast, the Swedish participants seemed further away from an intersectional praxis because they tended to view disability as a difficulty that requires individualised support measures and as a situational issue regarding the learning environment. The article proposes that these differences are connected to differences regarding disability and anti‐discrimination politics in both countries. In the US, disability politics have been characterised by a civil rights and social justice approach, while in Sweden disability politics have been conceived in terms of welfare services and a relational approach to disability. This article concludes that the conception of intersectionality as a critical praxis offers an original lens to gain new insights into how disability inclusion is promoted in different contexts.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/7085accommodationsanti‐discriminationdisabilitydiversityequityhigher educationinclusionintersectionalitypraxisswedenunited states
spellingShingle Marie Sépulchre
Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education
Social Inclusion
accommodations
anti‐discrimination
disability
diversity
equity
higher education
inclusion
intersectionality
praxis
sweden
united states
title Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education
title_full Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education
title_fullStr Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education
title_full_unstemmed Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education
title_short Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education
title_sort intersectional praxis and disability in higher education
topic accommodations
anti‐discrimination
disability
diversity
equity
higher education
inclusion
intersectionality
praxis
sweden
united states
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/7085
work_keys_str_mv AT mariesepulchre intersectionalpraxisanddisabilityinhighereducation