Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education
This article explores whether intersectional praxis can be discerned in the provision of disability/accessibility resources in higher education in Sweden and the United States. Analysing interviews with administrative staff based on hypothetical scenarios (vignettes) that could qualify as situations...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cogitatio
2023-12-01
|
Series: | Social Inclusion |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/7085 |
_version_ | 1797404181503410176 |
---|---|
author | Marie Sépulchre |
author_facet | Marie Sépulchre |
author_sort | Marie Sépulchre |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This article explores whether intersectional praxis can be discerned in the provision of disability/accessibility resources in higher education in Sweden and the United States. Analysing interviews with administrative staff based on hypothetical scenarios (vignettes) that could qualify as situations of disability discrimination, this article identifies several situations of (missed) opportunities for intersectional praxis. It then proceeds with a discussion of participants’ conceptions of disability and organisational possibilities for collaborations with other offices at their university or college. Although opportunities for intersectional praxis are generally absent or missed in both countries, the article argues that American participants were closer to such critical praxis because they tended to consider disability in terms of barriers and as a structural issue, and advocated for the recognition of disability as diversity. By contrast, the Swedish participants seemed further away from an intersectional praxis because they tended to view disability as a difficulty that requires individualised support measures and as a situational issue regarding the learning environment. The article proposes that these differences are connected to differences regarding disability and anti‐discrimination politics in both countries. In the US, disability politics have been characterised by a civil rights and social justice approach, while in Sweden disability politics have been conceived in terms of welfare services and a relational approach to disability. This article concludes that the conception of intersectionality as a critical praxis offers an original lens to gain new insights into how disability inclusion is promoted in different contexts. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T02:51:13Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-707d5d52ac76473d92afb5e299a32a62 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2183-2803 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T02:51:13Z |
publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
publisher | Cogitatio |
record_format | Article |
series | Social Inclusion |
spelling | doaj.art-707d5d52ac76473d92afb5e299a32a622023-12-05T10:44:37ZengCogitatioSocial Inclusion2183-28032023-12-0111436237210.17645/si.v11i4.70853217Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher EducationMarie Sépulchre0School of Social Work, Lund University, SwedenThis article explores whether intersectional praxis can be discerned in the provision of disability/accessibility resources in higher education in Sweden and the United States. Analysing interviews with administrative staff based on hypothetical scenarios (vignettes) that could qualify as situations of disability discrimination, this article identifies several situations of (missed) opportunities for intersectional praxis. It then proceeds with a discussion of participants’ conceptions of disability and organisational possibilities for collaborations with other offices at their university or college. Although opportunities for intersectional praxis are generally absent or missed in both countries, the article argues that American participants were closer to such critical praxis because they tended to consider disability in terms of barriers and as a structural issue, and advocated for the recognition of disability as diversity. By contrast, the Swedish participants seemed further away from an intersectional praxis because they tended to view disability as a difficulty that requires individualised support measures and as a situational issue regarding the learning environment. The article proposes that these differences are connected to differences regarding disability and anti‐discrimination politics in both countries. In the US, disability politics have been characterised by a civil rights and social justice approach, while in Sweden disability politics have been conceived in terms of welfare services and a relational approach to disability. This article concludes that the conception of intersectionality as a critical praxis offers an original lens to gain new insights into how disability inclusion is promoted in different contexts.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/7085accommodationsanti‐discriminationdisabilitydiversityequityhigher educationinclusionintersectionalitypraxisswedenunited states |
spellingShingle | Marie Sépulchre Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education Social Inclusion accommodations anti‐discrimination disability diversity equity higher education inclusion intersectionality praxis sweden united states |
title | Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education |
title_full | Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education |
title_fullStr | Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education |
title_full_unstemmed | Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education |
title_short | Intersectional Praxis and Disability in Higher Education |
title_sort | intersectional praxis and disability in higher education |
topic | accommodations anti‐discrimination disability diversity equity higher education inclusion intersectionality praxis sweden united states |
url | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/7085 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mariesepulchre intersectionalpraxisanddisabilityinhighereducation |