Learning healthcare systems in cardiology: A qualitative interview study on ethical dilemmas of a learning healthcare system

Abstract Background Implementation of an LHS in cardiology departments presents itself with ethical challenges, including ethical review and informed consent. In this qualitative study, we investigated stakeholders' attitudes toward ethical issues regarding the implementation of an LHS in the c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sara Laurijssen, Rieke van derGraaf, Ewoud Schuit, Melina denHaan, Wouter vanDijk, Rolf Groenwold, Saskia le Sessie, Diederick Grobbee, Martine deVries
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-01-01
Series:Learning Health Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10379
_version_ 1797351433567207424
author Sara Laurijssen
Rieke van derGraaf
Ewoud Schuit
Melina denHaan
Wouter vanDijk
Rolf Groenwold
Saskia le Sessie
Diederick Grobbee
Martine deVries
author_facet Sara Laurijssen
Rieke van derGraaf
Ewoud Schuit
Melina denHaan
Wouter vanDijk
Rolf Groenwold
Saskia le Sessie
Diederick Grobbee
Martine deVries
author_sort Sara Laurijssen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Implementation of an LHS in cardiology departments presents itself with ethical challenges, including ethical review and informed consent. In this qualitative study, we investigated stakeholders' attitudes toward ethical issues regarding the implementation of an LHS in the cardiology department. Methods We conducted a qualitative study using 35 semi‐structured interviews and 5 focus group interviews with 34 individuals. We interviewed cardiologists, research nurses, cardiovascular patients, ethicists, health lawyers, epidemiologists/statisticians and insurance spokespersons. Results Respondents identified different ethical obstacles for the implementation of an LHS within the cardiology department. These obstacles were mainly on ethical oversight in LHSs; in particular, informed con sent and data ownership were discussed. In addition, respondents reported on the role of patients in LHS. Respondents described the LHS as a possibility for patients to engage in both research and care. While the LHS can promote patient engagement, patients might also be reduced to their data and are therefore at risk, according to respondents. Conclusions Views on the ethical dilemmas of a LHSs within cardiology are diverse. Similar to the literary debate on oversight, there are different views on how ethical oversight should be regulated. This study adds to the literary debate on oversight by highlighting that patients wish to be informed about the learning activities within the LHS they participate in, and that they wish to actively contribute by sharing their data and identifying learning goals, provided that informed consent is obtained.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T13:00:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7109eddd75654584904eea453f8f91fc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2379-6146
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T13:00:22Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Learning Health Systems
spelling doaj.art-7109eddd75654584904eea453f8f91fc2024-01-19T10:27:42ZengWileyLearning Health Systems2379-61462024-01-0181n/an/a10.1002/lrh2.10379Learning healthcare systems in cardiology: A qualitative interview study on ethical dilemmas of a learning healthcare systemSara Laurijssen0Rieke van derGraaf1Ewoud Schuit2Melina denHaan3Wouter vanDijk4Rolf Groenwold5Saskia le Sessie6Diederick Grobbee7Martine deVries8Department of Healthcare Saxion Applied University Deventer NetherlandsUniversity Medical Center Utrecht NetherlandsUniversity Medical Center Utrecht NetherlandsLeiden University Medical Center Leiden NetherlandsUniversity Medical Center Utrecht NetherlandsLeiden University Medical Center Leiden NetherlandsLeiden University Medical Center Leiden NetherlandsUniversity Medical Center Utrecht NetherlandsDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Law Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum Leiden NetherlandsAbstract Background Implementation of an LHS in cardiology departments presents itself with ethical challenges, including ethical review and informed consent. In this qualitative study, we investigated stakeholders' attitudes toward ethical issues regarding the implementation of an LHS in the cardiology department. Methods We conducted a qualitative study using 35 semi‐structured interviews and 5 focus group interviews with 34 individuals. We interviewed cardiologists, research nurses, cardiovascular patients, ethicists, health lawyers, epidemiologists/statisticians and insurance spokespersons. Results Respondents identified different ethical obstacles for the implementation of an LHS within the cardiology department. These obstacles were mainly on ethical oversight in LHSs; in particular, informed con sent and data ownership were discussed. In addition, respondents reported on the role of patients in LHS. Respondents described the LHS as a possibility for patients to engage in both research and care. While the LHS can promote patient engagement, patients might also be reduced to their data and are therefore at risk, according to respondents. Conclusions Views on the ethical dilemmas of a LHSs within cardiology are diverse. Similar to the literary debate on oversight, there are different views on how ethical oversight should be regulated. This study adds to the literary debate on oversight by highlighting that patients wish to be informed about the learning activities within the LHS they participate in, and that they wish to actively contribute by sharing their data and identifying learning goals, provided that informed consent is obtained.https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10379cardiologyethicslearning healthcare systemqualitative research
spellingShingle Sara Laurijssen
Rieke van derGraaf
Ewoud Schuit
Melina denHaan
Wouter vanDijk
Rolf Groenwold
Saskia le Sessie
Diederick Grobbee
Martine deVries
Learning healthcare systems in cardiology: A qualitative interview study on ethical dilemmas of a learning healthcare system
Learning Health Systems
cardiology
ethics
learning healthcare system
qualitative research
title Learning healthcare systems in cardiology: A qualitative interview study on ethical dilemmas of a learning healthcare system
title_full Learning healthcare systems in cardiology: A qualitative interview study on ethical dilemmas of a learning healthcare system
title_fullStr Learning healthcare systems in cardiology: A qualitative interview study on ethical dilemmas of a learning healthcare system
title_full_unstemmed Learning healthcare systems in cardiology: A qualitative interview study on ethical dilemmas of a learning healthcare system
title_short Learning healthcare systems in cardiology: A qualitative interview study on ethical dilemmas of a learning healthcare system
title_sort learning healthcare systems in cardiology a qualitative interview study on ethical dilemmas of a learning healthcare system
topic cardiology
ethics
learning healthcare system
qualitative research
url https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10379
work_keys_str_mv AT saralaurijssen learninghealthcaresystemsincardiologyaqualitativeinterviewstudyonethicaldilemmasofalearninghealthcaresystem
AT riekevandergraaf learninghealthcaresystemsincardiologyaqualitativeinterviewstudyonethicaldilemmasofalearninghealthcaresystem
AT ewoudschuit learninghealthcaresystemsincardiologyaqualitativeinterviewstudyonethicaldilemmasofalearninghealthcaresystem
AT melinadenhaan learninghealthcaresystemsincardiologyaqualitativeinterviewstudyonethicaldilemmasofalearninghealthcaresystem
AT woutervandijk learninghealthcaresystemsincardiologyaqualitativeinterviewstudyonethicaldilemmasofalearninghealthcaresystem
AT rolfgroenwold learninghealthcaresystemsincardiologyaqualitativeinterviewstudyonethicaldilemmasofalearninghealthcaresystem
AT saskialesessie learninghealthcaresystemsincardiologyaqualitativeinterviewstudyonethicaldilemmasofalearninghealthcaresystem
AT diederickgrobbee learninghealthcaresystemsincardiologyaqualitativeinterviewstudyonethicaldilemmasofalearninghealthcaresystem
AT martinedevries learninghealthcaresystemsincardiologyaqualitativeinterviewstudyonethicaldilemmasofalearninghealthcaresystem