The “D&I Bridge”: introducing a teaching tool to define the D, the I, and the why

Abstract Interest in learning dissemination and implementation (D&I) science is at an all-time high. As founding faculty and fellows of a new center focused on D&I science, we have found that non-specialist researchers and newcomers to D&I science often express confusion around the diffe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sara J. Becker, Kira DiClemente-Bosco, Kelli Scott, Sarah A. Helseth, Zabin Patel-Syed, Dennis H. Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-02-01
Series:Implementation Science Communications
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00558-z
_version_ 1827327321996001280
author Sara J. Becker
Kira DiClemente-Bosco
Kelli Scott
Sarah A. Helseth
Zabin Patel-Syed
Dennis H. Li
author_facet Sara J. Becker
Kira DiClemente-Bosco
Kelli Scott
Sarah A. Helseth
Zabin Patel-Syed
Dennis H. Li
author_sort Sara J. Becker
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Interest in learning dissemination and implementation (D&I) science is at an all-time high. As founding faculty and fellows of a new center focused on D&I science, we have found that non-specialist researchers and newcomers to D&I science often express confusion around the difference between the D and the I. Relatedly, they struggle to identify what their specific D&I projects target to impact public health within the amorphous “black box” that is the singular, loosely defined “research-to-practice gap.” To improve conceptual clarity and enhance engagement with D&I science, we developed a graphic—the D&I Bridge—and an accompanying glossary of terms to use as a teaching and framing tool. The D&I Bridge depicts D&I science as bridging what we know from public health knowledge to what we do in public health practice with intention and equity, and it spans over four distinct, inter-related gaps: the public health supply gap, the public health demand gap, the methodological/scientific gap, and the expertise capacity gap. The public health supply gap is addressed by implementation strategies, whereas the public health demand gap is addressed by dissemination strategies. The methodological/scientific gap is addressed by producing generalizable knowledge about D&I, and the expertise capacity gap is addressed by developing the multi-disciplinary workforce needed to advance D&I. Initial practice feedback about the D&I Bridge has been positive, and this conceptualization of D&I science has helped inform our center’s D&I training, D&I project consultations, and strategic planning. We believe the D&I Bridge provides a useful heuristic for helping non-specialists understand the differential scopes of various D&I science projects as well as specific gaps that may be addressed by D&I methods.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T14:58:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-71450090265d47a3b1445333b0cbe147
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2662-2211
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T14:58:29Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Implementation Science Communications
spelling doaj.art-71450090265d47a3b1445333b0cbe1472024-03-05T19:16:51ZengBMCImplementation Science Communications2662-22112024-02-01511710.1186/s43058-024-00558-zThe “D&I Bridge”: introducing a teaching tool to define the D, the I, and the whySara J. Becker0Kira DiClemente-Bosco1Kelli Scott2Sarah A. Helseth3Zabin Patel-Syed4Dennis H. Li5Center for Dissemination and Implementation Science, Northwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineCenter for Dissemination and Implementation Science, Northwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineCenter for Dissemination and Implementation Science, Northwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineCenter for Dissemination and Implementation Science, Northwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineCenter for Dissemination and Implementation Science, Northwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineCenter for Dissemination and Implementation Science, Northwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineAbstract Interest in learning dissemination and implementation (D&I) science is at an all-time high. As founding faculty and fellows of a new center focused on D&I science, we have found that non-specialist researchers and newcomers to D&I science often express confusion around the difference between the D and the I. Relatedly, they struggle to identify what their specific D&I projects target to impact public health within the amorphous “black box” that is the singular, loosely defined “research-to-practice gap.” To improve conceptual clarity and enhance engagement with D&I science, we developed a graphic—the D&I Bridge—and an accompanying glossary of terms to use as a teaching and framing tool. The D&I Bridge depicts D&I science as bridging what we know from public health knowledge to what we do in public health practice with intention and equity, and it spans over four distinct, inter-related gaps: the public health supply gap, the public health demand gap, the methodological/scientific gap, and the expertise capacity gap. The public health supply gap is addressed by implementation strategies, whereas the public health demand gap is addressed by dissemination strategies. The methodological/scientific gap is addressed by producing generalizable knowledge about D&I, and the expertise capacity gap is addressed by developing the multi-disciplinary workforce needed to advance D&I. Initial practice feedback about the D&I Bridge has been positive, and this conceptualization of D&I science has helped inform our center’s D&I training, D&I project consultations, and strategic planning. We believe the D&I Bridge provides a useful heuristic for helping non-specialists understand the differential scopes of various D&I science projects as well as specific gaps that may be addressed by D&I methods.https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00558-zDissemination scienceImplementation scienceTeachingPublic health
spellingShingle Sara J. Becker
Kira DiClemente-Bosco
Kelli Scott
Sarah A. Helseth
Zabin Patel-Syed
Dennis H. Li
The “D&I Bridge”: introducing a teaching tool to define the D, the I, and the why
Implementation Science Communications
Dissemination science
Implementation science
Teaching
Public health
title The “D&I Bridge”: introducing a teaching tool to define the D, the I, and the why
title_full The “D&I Bridge”: introducing a teaching tool to define the D, the I, and the why
title_fullStr The “D&I Bridge”: introducing a teaching tool to define the D, the I, and the why
title_full_unstemmed The “D&I Bridge”: introducing a teaching tool to define the D, the I, and the why
title_short The “D&I Bridge”: introducing a teaching tool to define the D, the I, and the why
title_sort d i bridge introducing a teaching tool to define the d the i and the why
topic Dissemination science
Implementation science
Teaching
Public health
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00558-z
work_keys_str_mv AT sarajbecker thedibridgeintroducingateachingtooltodefinethedtheiandthewhy
AT kiradiclementebosco thedibridgeintroducingateachingtooltodefinethedtheiandthewhy
AT kelliscott thedibridgeintroducingateachingtooltodefinethedtheiandthewhy
AT sarahahelseth thedibridgeintroducingateachingtooltodefinethedtheiandthewhy
AT zabinpatelsyed thedibridgeintroducingateachingtooltodefinethedtheiandthewhy
AT dennishli thedibridgeintroducingateachingtooltodefinethedtheiandthewhy
AT sarajbecker dibridgeintroducingateachingtooltodefinethedtheiandthewhy
AT kiradiclementebosco dibridgeintroducingateachingtooltodefinethedtheiandthewhy
AT kelliscott dibridgeintroducingateachingtooltodefinethedtheiandthewhy
AT sarahahelseth dibridgeintroducingateachingtooltodefinethedtheiandthewhy
AT zabinpatelsyed dibridgeintroducingateachingtooltodefinethedtheiandthewhy
AT dennishli dibridgeintroducingateachingtooltodefinethedtheiandthewhy