Tedizolid, Faropenem, and Moxifloxacin Combination With Potential Activity Against Nonreplicating Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Background:Mycobacteriumtuberculosis [Mtb] could be present in different metabolic population in the lung lesions, and nonreplicating persisters [NRP], associated with latent tuberculosis [TB], are the most difficult to kill.Objective: Test the combination of tedizolid, moxifloxacin, and faropenem f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shashikant Srivastava, Kayle N. Cirrincione, Devyani Deshpande, Tawanda Gumbo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2020.616294/full
_version_ 1818426368099090432
author Shashikant Srivastava
Shashikant Srivastava
Shashikant Srivastava
Kayle N. Cirrincione
Devyani Deshpande
Tawanda Gumbo
Tawanda Gumbo
Tawanda Gumbo
author_facet Shashikant Srivastava
Shashikant Srivastava
Shashikant Srivastava
Kayle N. Cirrincione
Devyani Deshpande
Tawanda Gumbo
Tawanda Gumbo
Tawanda Gumbo
author_sort Shashikant Srivastava
collection DOAJ
description Background:Mycobacteriumtuberculosis [Mtb] could be present in different metabolic population in the lung lesions, and nonreplicating persisters [NRP], associated with latent tuberculosis [TB], are the most difficult to kill.Objective: Test the combination of tedizolid, moxifloxacin, and faropenem for activity against NRP using Mtb SS18b in the hollow fiber model [HFS-TB].Methods: Tedizolid and moxifloxacin were tested as, first, two-drug combination against log-phase growth [LPG] and, second, slowly replicating bacilli [SRB] under acidic condition and with faropenem to create a three-drug combination regimen. Finally, standard regimen [isoniazid-rifampin-pyrazinamide] was used as comparator in the HFS-TB experiment with NRP Mtb. HFS-TB units were sampled for drug-concentration measurement as well as for estimation of bacterial burden using solid agar and mycobacterial growth indicator tube [MGIT] method. Linear regression was used to calculate the kill slopes with each treatment regimen and analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare the regimen.Results: Tedizolid at standard dose in combination with high-dose moxifloxacin killed 3.05 log10 CFU/ml LPG Mtb and 7.37 log10 CFU/ml SRB in the bactericidal and sterilizing activity HFS-TB experiments, respectively. There was no statistical difference between tedizolid-moxifloxacin-faropenem combination and the standard regimen as both killed 7.35 log10 CFU/ml NRP Mtb in 21 days. There was no emergence of resistance to any of the drugs studied in the three HFS-TB experiments.Conclusion: The experimental regimen of tedizolid, moxifloxacin, and faropenem could effectively kill NRP population of Mtb, and given the efficacy against different metabolic population of Mtb could serve as a pan-TB regimen. Clinical studies are warranted to validate the in vitro findings.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T14:28:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-73503d5c9abd41d69a6d80d1c1a4a283
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1663-9812
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T14:28:43Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pharmacology
spelling doaj.art-73503d5c9abd41d69a6d80d1c1a4a2832022-12-21T22:57:52ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pharmacology1663-98122021-01-011110.3389/fphar.2020.616294616294Tedizolid, Faropenem, and Moxifloxacin Combination With Potential Activity Against Nonreplicating Mycobacterium tuberculosisShashikant Srivastava0Shashikant Srivastava1Shashikant Srivastava2Kayle N. Cirrincione3Devyani Deshpande4Tawanda Gumbo5Tawanda Gumbo6Tawanda Gumbo7Center for Infectious Diseases Research and Experimental Therapeutics, Baylor Research Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United StatesDepartment of Immunology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United StatesDepartment of Pulmonary Immunology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Tyler, TX, United StatesCenter for Infectious Diseases Research and Experimental Therapeutics, Baylor Research Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United StatesCenter for Infectious Diseases Research and Experimental Therapeutics, Baylor Research Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United StatesCenter for Infectious Diseases Research and Experimental Therapeutics, Baylor Research Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United StatesPraedicare Laboratories and Quantitative Preclinical & Clinical Sciences Department Praedicare Inc., Dallas, TX, United StatesDepartment of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Observatory, Cape Town, South AfricaBackground:Mycobacteriumtuberculosis [Mtb] could be present in different metabolic population in the lung lesions, and nonreplicating persisters [NRP], associated with latent tuberculosis [TB], are the most difficult to kill.Objective: Test the combination of tedizolid, moxifloxacin, and faropenem for activity against NRP using Mtb SS18b in the hollow fiber model [HFS-TB].Methods: Tedizolid and moxifloxacin were tested as, first, two-drug combination against log-phase growth [LPG] and, second, slowly replicating bacilli [SRB] under acidic condition and with faropenem to create a three-drug combination regimen. Finally, standard regimen [isoniazid-rifampin-pyrazinamide] was used as comparator in the HFS-TB experiment with NRP Mtb. HFS-TB units were sampled for drug-concentration measurement as well as for estimation of bacterial burden using solid agar and mycobacterial growth indicator tube [MGIT] method. Linear regression was used to calculate the kill slopes with each treatment regimen and analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare the regimen.Results: Tedizolid at standard dose in combination with high-dose moxifloxacin killed 3.05 log10 CFU/ml LPG Mtb and 7.37 log10 CFU/ml SRB in the bactericidal and sterilizing activity HFS-TB experiments, respectively. There was no statistical difference between tedizolid-moxifloxacin-faropenem combination and the standard regimen as both killed 7.35 log10 CFU/ml NRP Mtb in 21 days. There was no emergence of resistance to any of the drugs studied in the three HFS-TB experiments.Conclusion: The experimental regimen of tedizolid, moxifloxacin, and faropenem could effectively kill NRP population of Mtb, and given the efficacy against different metabolic population of Mtb could serve as a pan-TB regimen. Clinical studies are warranted to validate the in vitro findings.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2020.616294/fullspecial populationtuberculosisnonreplicating persistersregimenhollow fiber model
spellingShingle Shashikant Srivastava
Shashikant Srivastava
Shashikant Srivastava
Kayle N. Cirrincione
Devyani Deshpande
Tawanda Gumbo
Tawanda Gumbo
Tawanda Gumbo
Tedizolid, Faropenem, and Moxifloxacin Combination With Potential Activity Against Nonreplicating Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Frontiers in Pharmacology
special population
tuberculosis
nonreplicating persisters
regimen
hollow fiber model
title Tedizolid, Faropenem, and Moxifloxacin Combination With Potential Activity Against Nonreplicating Mycobacterium tuberculosis
title_full Tedizolid, Faropenem, and Moxifloxacin Combination With Potential Activity Against Nonreplicating Mycobacterium tuberculosis
title_fullStr Tedizolid, Faropenem, and Moxifloxacin Combination With Potential Activity Against Nonreplicating Mycobacterium tuberculosis
title_full_unstemmed Tedizolid, Faropenem, and Moxifloxacin Combination With Potential Activity Against Nonreplicating Mycobacterium tuberculosis
title_short Tedizolid, Faropenem, and Moxifloxacin Combination With Potential Activity Against Nonreplicating Mycobacterium tuberculosis
title_sort tedizolid faropenem and moxifloxacin combination with potential activity against nonreplicating mycobacterium tuberculosis
topic special population
tuberculosis
nonreplicating persisters
regimen
hollow fiber model
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2020.616294/full
work_keys_str_mv AT shashikantsrivastava tedizolidfaropenemandmoxifloxacincombinationwithpotentialactivityagainstnonreplicatingmycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT shashikantsrivastava tedizolidfaropenemandmoxifloxacincombinationwithpotentialactivityagainstnonreplicatingmycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT shashikantsrivastava tedizolidfaropenemandmoxifloxacincombinationwithpotentialactivityagainstnonreplicatingmycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT kaylencirrincione tedizolidfaropenemandmoxifloxacincombinationwithpotentialactivityagainstnonreplicatingmycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT devyanideshpande tedizolidfaropenemandmoxifloxacincombinationwithpotentialactivityagainstnonreplicatingmycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT tawandagumbo tedizolidfaropenemandmoxifloxacincombinationwithpotentialactivityagainstnonreplicatingmycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT tawandagumbo tedizolidfaropenemandmoxifloxacincombinationwithpotentialactivityagainstnonreplicatingmycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT tawandagumbo tedizolidfaropenemandmoxifloxacincombinationwithpotentialactivityagainstnonreplicatingmycobacteriumtuberculosis