Stabilizing DNA–Protein Co-Crystals via Intra-Crystal Chemical Ligation of the DNA

Protein and DNA co-crystals are most commonly prepared to reveal structural and functional details of DNA-binding proteins when subjected to X-ray diffraction. However, biomolecular crystals are notoriously unstable in solution conditions other than their native growth solution. To achieve greater a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abigail R. Orun, Sara Dmytriw, Ananya Vajapayajula, Christopher D. Snow
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-12-01
Series:Crystals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/12/1/49
_version_ 1827666113623752704
author Abigail R. Orun
Sara Dmytriw
Ananya Vajapayajula
Christopher D. Snow
author_facet Abigail R. Orun
Sara Dmytriw
Ananya Vajapayajula
Christopher D. Snow
author_sort Abigail R. Orun
collection DOAJ
description Protein and DNA co-crystals are most commonly prepared to reveal structural and functional details of DNA-binding proteins when subjected to X-ray diffraction. However, biomolecular crystals are notoriously unstable in solution conditions other than their native growth solution. To achieve greater application utility beyond structural biology, biomolecular crystals should be made robust against harsh conditions. To overcome this challenge, we optimized chemical DNA ligation within a co-crystal. Co-crystals from two distinct DNA-binding proteins underwent DNA ligation with the carbodiimide crosslinking agent 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC) under various optimization conditions: 5′ vs. 3′ terminal phosphate, EDC concentration, EDC incubation time, and repeated EDC dose. This crosslinking and DNA ligation route did not destroy crystal diffraction. In fact, the ligation of DNA across the DNA–DNA junctions was clearly revealed via X-ray diffraction structure determination. Furthermore, crystal macrostructure was fortified. Neither the loss of counterions in pure water, nor incubation in blood serum, nor incubation at low pH (2.0 or 4.5) led to apparent crystal degradation. These findings motivate the use of crosslinked biomolecular co-crystals for purposes beyond structural biology, including biomedical applications.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T01:41:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-768b0bf66829424c9dff2c87d20a0535
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4352
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T01:41:25Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Crystals
spelling doaj.art-768b0bf66829424c9dff2c87d20a05352023-11-23T13:24:22ZengMDPI AGCrystals2073-43522021-12-011214910.3390/cryst12010049Stabilizing DNA–Protein Co-Crystals via Intra-Crystal Chemical Ligation of the DNAAbigail R. Orun0Sara Dmytriw1Ananya Vajapayajula2Christopher D. Snow3Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, 1301 Center Ave, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USADepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Colorado State University, 1370 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USADepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Colorado State University, 1370 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USADepartment of Chemistry, Colorado State University, 1301 Center Ave, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USAProtein and DNA co-crystals are most commonly prepared to reveal structural and functional details of DNA-binding proteins when subjected to X-ray diffraction. However, biomolecular crystals are notoriously unstable in solution conditions other than their native growth solution. To achieve greater application utility beyond structural biology, biomolecular crystals should be made robust against harsh conditions. To overcome this challenge, we optimized chemical DNA ligation within a co-crystal. Co-crystals from two distinct DNA-binding proteins underwent DNA ligation with the carbodiimide crosslinking agent 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC) under various optimization conditions: 5′ vs. 3′ terminal phosphate, EDC concentration, EDC incubation time, and repeated EDC dose. This crosslinking and DNA ligation route did not destroy crystal diffraction. In fact, the ligation of DNA across the DNA–DNA junctions was clearly revealed via X-ray diffraction structure determination. Furthermore, crystal macrostructure was fortified. Neither the loss of counterions in pure water, nor incubation in blood serum, nor incubation at low pH (2.0 or 4.5) led to apparent crystal degradation. These findings motivate the use of crosslinked biomolecular co-crystals for purposes beyond structural biology, including biomedical applications.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/12/1/49co-crystal engineeringchemical ligationbioconjugationX-ray diffractionDNADNA-binding protein
spellingShingle Abigail R. Orun
Sara Dmytriw
Ananya Vajapayajula
Christopher D. Snow
Stabilizing DNA–Protein Co-Crystals via Intra-Crystal Chemical Ligation of the DNA
Crystals
co-crystal engineering
chemical ligation
bioconjugation
X-ray diffraction
DNA
DNA-binding protein
title Stabilizing DNA–Protein Co-Crystals via Intra-Crystal Chemical Ligation of the DNA
title_full Stabilizing DNA–Protein Co-Crystals via Intra-Crystal Chemical Ligation of the DNA
title_fullStr Stabilizing DNA–Protein Co-Crystals via Intra-Crystal Chemical Ligation of the DNA
title_full_unstemmed Stabilizing DNA–Protein Co-Crystals via Intra-Crystal Chemical Ligation of the DNA
title_short Stabilizing DNA–Protein Co-Crystals via Intra-Crystal Chemical Ligation of the DNA
title_sort stabilizing dna protein co crystals via intra crystal chemical ligation of the dna
topic co-crystal engineering
chemical ligation
bioconjugation
X-ray diffraction
DNA
DNA-binding protein
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/12/1/49
work_keys_str_mv AT abigailrorun stabilizingdnaproteincocrystalsviaintracrystalchemicalligationofthedna
AT saradmytriw stabilizingdnaproteincocrystalsviaintracrystalchemicalligationofthedna
AT ananyavajapayajula stabilizingdnaproteincocrystalsviaintracrystalchemicalligationofthedna
AT christopherdsnow stabilizingdnaproteincocrystalsviaintracrystalchemicalligationofthedna