Validity of two general outcome measures of science and social studies achievement
The present research expanded validity findings for a structured formative assessment measure of content learning that was administered online and known as critical content monitoring. The study also evaluated the potential for additional measures, including sentence verification technique and writ...
Main Authors: | Paul Mooney, Renée E. Lastrapes, Amanda M. Marcotte, Amy Matthews |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Vilnius University Press
2016-06-01
|
Series: | Specialusis Ugdymas |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.journals.vu.lt/special-education/article/view/25500 |
Similar Items
-
IELTS Writing Preparation Course Expectations and Outcome: A Comparative Study of Iranian Students and Their Teachers’ Perspectives
by: Musa Nushi, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Validity and reliability of the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures – Physiotherapy, for podiatry (AusTOMs-PT for use in podiatry)
by: Cylie M. Williams, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01) -
QUESTIONING THE HYBRID MODEL: STUDENT OUTCOMES IN DIFFERENT COURSE FORMATS
by: Saxon G. Reasons, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01) -
Assessing English: A Comparison between Canada and England’s Assessment Procedures
by: Bethan Marshall, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01) -
E-assessment during COVID-19 pandemic at a Saudi university: impact on assessment methods and course learning outcomes
by: Bhuiyan Abdullah Al Mamun, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01)