Carbon, Nitrogen and Water Footprints of Organic Rice and Conventional Rice Production over 4 Years of Cultivation: A Case Study in the Lower North of Thailand

An integrated method is required for comprehensive assessment of the environmental impacts and economic benefits of rice production systems. Therefore, the objective of this study was to apply different footprinting approaches (carbon footprint (CF), nitrogen footprint (NF), water footprint (WF)) an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Noppol Arunrat, Sukanya Sereenonchai, Winai Chaowiwat, Can Wang, Ryusuke Hatano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-02-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/2/380
_version_ 1797483674269122560
author Noppol Arunrat
Sukanya Sereenonchai
Winai Chaowiwat
Can Wang
Ryusuke Hatano
author_facet Noppol Arunrat
Sukanya Sereenonchai
Winai Chaowiwat
Can Wang
Ryusuke Hatano
author_sort Noppol Arunrat
collection DOAJ
description An integrated method is required for comprehensive assessment of the environmental impacts and economic benefits of rice production systems. Therefore, the objective of this study was to apply different footprinting approaches (carbon footprint (CF), nitrogen footprint (NF), water footprint (WF)) and determine the economic return on organic rice farming (OF) and conventional rice farming (CVF) at the farm scale. Over the 4-year study period (2018–2021), the results showed lower net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in OF (3289.1 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) than in CVF (4921.7 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>), indicating that the use of OF can mitigate the GHG emissions from soil carbon sequestration. However, there was a higher CF intensity in OF (1.17 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq kg<sup>−1</sup> rice yield) than in CVF (0.93 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq kg<sup>−1</sup> rice yield) due to the lower yield. The NF intensities of OF and CVF were 0.34 and 11.94 kg Neq kg<sup>−1</sup> rice yield, respectively. The total WF of CVF (1470.1 m<sup>3</sup> ton<sup>−1</sup>) was higher than that in OF (1216.3 m<sup>3</sup> ton<sup>−1</sup>). The gray water in CVF was significantly higher than that in OF due to the use of chemical fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides. Although the rice yield in OF was nearly two times lower than that in CVF, the economic return was higher due to lower production costs and higher rice prices. However, more field studies and long-term monitoring are needed for future research.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T22:50:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7b5e3b80b55f4fe992da36f959f30357
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4395
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T22:50:26Z
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Agronomy
spelling doaj.art-7b5e3b80b55f4fe992da36f959f303572023-11-23T18:21:01ZengMDPI AGAgronomy2073-43952022-02-0112238010.3390/agronomy12020380Carbon, Nitrogen and Water Footprints of Organic Rice and Conventional Rice Production over 4 Years of Cultivation: A Case Study in the Lower North of ThailandNoppol Arunrat0Sukanya Sereenonchai1Winai Chaowiwat2Can Wang3Ryusuke Hatano4Faculty of Environment and Resource Studies, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom 73170, ThailandFaculty of Environment and Resource Studies, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom 73170, ThailandHydro-Informatics Innovation Division, Hydro Informatics Institute, Bangkok 10400, ThailandState Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control (SKLESPC), School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, ChinaLaboratory of Soil Science, Graduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8589, JapanAn integrated method is required for comprehensive assessment of the environmental impacts and economic benefits of rice production systems. Therefore, the objective of this study was to apply different footprinting approaches (carbon footprint (CF), nitrogen footprint (NF), water footprint (WF)) and determine the economic return on organic rice farming (OF) and conventional rice farming (CVF) at the farm scale. Over the 4-year study period (2018–2021), the results showed lower net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in OF (3289.1 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) than in CVF (4921.7 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>), indicating that the use of OF can mitigate the GHG emissions from soil carbon sequestration. However, there was a higher CF intensity in OF (1.17 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq kg<sup>−1</sup> rice yield) than in CVF (0.93 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq kg<sup>−1</sup> rice yield) due to the lower yield. The NF intensities of OF and CVF were 0.34 and 11.94 kg Neq kg<sup>−1</sup> rice yield, respectively. The total WF of CVF (1470.1 m<sup>3</sup> ton<sup>−1</sup>) was higher than that in OF (1216.3 m<sup>3</sup> ton<sup>−1</sup>). The gray water in CVF was significantly higher than that in OF due to the use of chemical fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides. Although the rice yield in OF was nearly two times lower than that in CVF, the economic return was higher due to lower production costs and higher rice prices. However, more field studies and long-term monitoring are needed for future research.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/2/380carbon footprintnitrogen footprintwater footprintsoil organic carbonrice paddy
spellingShingle Noppol Arunrat
Sukanya Sereenonchai
Winai Chaowiwat
Can Wang
Ryusuke Hatano
Carbon, Nitrogen and Water Footprints of Organic Rice and Conventional Rice Production over 4 Years of Cultivation: A Case Study in the Lower North of Thailand
Agronomy
carbon footprint
nitrogen footprint
water footprint
soil organic carbon
rice paddy
title Carbon, Nitrogen and Water Footprints of Organic Rice and Conventional Rice Production over 4 Years of Cultivation: A Case Study in the Lower North of Thailand
title_full Carbon, Nitrogen and Water Footprints of Organic Rice and Conventional Rice Production over 4 Years of Cultivation: A Case Study in the Lower North of Thailand
title_fullStr Carbon, Nitrogen and Water Footprints of Organic Rice and Conventional Rice Production over 4 Years of Cultivation: A Case Study in the Lower North of Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Carbon, Nitrogen and Water Footprints of Organic Rice and Conventional Rice Production over 4 Years of Cultivation: A Case Study in the Lower North of Thailand
title_short Carbon, Nitrogen and Water Footprints of Organic Rice and Conventional Rice Production over 4 Years of Cultivation: A Case Study in the Lower North of Thailand
title_sort carbon nitrogen and water footprints of organic rice and conventional rice production over 4 years of cultivation a case study in the lower north of thailand
topic carbon footprint
nitrogen footprint
water footprint
soil organic carbon
rice paddy
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/2/380
work_keys_str_mv AT noppolarunrat carbonnitrogenandwaterfootprintsoforganicriceandconventionalriceproductionover4yearsofcultivationacasestudyinthelowernorthofthailand
AT sukanyasereenonchai carbonnitrogenandwaterfootprintsoforganicriceandconventionalriceproductionover4yearsofcultivationacasestudyinthelowernorthofthailand
AT winaichaowiwat carbonnitrogenandwaterfootprintsoforganicriceandconventionalriceproductionover4yearsofcultivationacasestudyinthelowernorthofthailand
AT canwang carbonnitrogenandwaterfootprintsoforganicriceandconventionalriceproductionover4yearsofcultivationacasestudyinthelowernorthofthailand
AT ryusukehatano carbonnitrogenandwaterfootprintsoforganicriceandconventionalriceproductionover4yearsofcultivationacasestudyinthelowernorthofthailand