Trans-population graph-based coverage optimization of allogeneic cellular therapy

BackgroundPre-clinical development and in-human trials of ‘off-the-shelf’ immune effector cell therapy (IECT) are burgeoning. IECT offers many potential advantages over autologous products. The relevant HLA matching criteria vary from product to product and depend on the strategies employed to reduc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sapir Israeli, Elizabeth F. Krakow, Martin Maiers, Corinne Summers, Yoram Louzoun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Immunology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1069749/full
_version_ 1827946694452445184
author Sapir Israeli
Elizabeth F. Krakow
Elizabeth F. Krakow
Martin Maiers
Martin Maiers
Corinne Summers
Corinne Summers
Corinne Summers
Yoram Louzoun
author_facet Sapir Israeli
Elizabeth F. Krakow
Elizabeth F. Krakow
Martin Maiers
Martin Maiers
Corinne Summers
Corinne Summers
Corinne Summers
Yoram Louzoun
author_sort Sapir Israeli
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundPre-clinical development and in-human trials of ‘off-the-shelf’ immune effector cell therapy (IECT) are burgeoning. IECT offers many potential advantages over autologous products. The relevant HLA matching criteria vary from product to product and depend on the strategies employed to reduce the risk of GvHD or to improve allo-IEC persistence, as warranted by different clinical indications, disease kinetics, on-target/off-tumor effects, and therapeutic cell type (T cell subtype, NK, etc.).ObjectiveThe optimal choice of candidate donors to maximize target patient population coverage and minimize cost and redundant effort in creating off-the-shelf IECT product banks is still an open problem. We propose here a solution to this problem, and test whether it would be more expensive to recruit additional donors or to prevent class I or class II HLA expression through gene editing.Study designWe developed an optimal coverage problem, combined with a graph-based algorithm to solve the donor selection problem under different, clinically plausible scenarios (having different HLA matching priorities). We then compared the efficiency of different optimization algorithms – a greedy solution, a linear programming (LP) solution, and integer linear programming (ILP) -- as well as random donor selection (average of 5 random trials) to show that an optimization can be performed at the entire population level.ResultsThe average additional population coverage per donor decrease with the number of donors, and varies with the scenario. The Greedy, LP and ILP algorithms consistently achieve the optimal coverage with far fewer donors than the random choice. In all cases, the number of randomly-selected donors required to achieve a desired coverage increases with increasing population. However, when optimal donors are selected, the number of donors required may counter-intuitively decrease with increasing population size. When comparing recruiting more donors vs gene editing, the latter was generally more expensive. When choosing donors and patients from different populations, the number of random donors required drastically increases, while the number of optimal donors does not change. Random donors fail to cover populations different from their original populations, while a small number of optimal donors from one population can cover a different population.DiscussionGraph-based coverage optimization algorithms can flexibly handle various HLA matching criteria and accommodate additional information such as KIR genotype, when such information becomes routinely available. These algorithms offer a more efficient way to develop off-the-shelf IECT product banks compared to random donor selection and offer some possibility of improved transparency and standardization in product design.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T11:04:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7e49a1f35754430a8c49d3c705a4013f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-3224
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T11:04:30Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Immunology
spelling doaj.art-7e49a1f35754430a8c49d3c705a4013f2023-05-16T08:47:48ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Immunology1664-32242023-05-011410.3389/fimmu.2023.10697491069749Trans-population graph-based coverage optimization of allogeneic cellular therapySapir Israeli0Elizabeth F. Krakow1Elizabeth F. Krakow2Martin Maiers3Martin Maiers4Corinne Summers5Corinne Summers6Corinne Summers7Yoram Louzoun8Department of Mathematics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, IsraelClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United StatesDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United StatesDepartment of Bioinformatics, Center for Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Minneapolis, MN, United StatesDepartment of Bioinformatics, National Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match, Minneapolis, MN, United StatesClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United StatesDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United StatesPediatric Hematology/Oncology Department, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, WA, United StatesDepartment of Mathematics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, IsraelBackgroundPre-clinical development and in-human trials of ‘off-the-shelf’ immune effector cell therapy (IECT) are burgeoning. IECT offers many potential advantages over autologous products. The relevant HLA matching criteria vary from product to product and depend on the strategies employed to reduce the risk of GvHD or to improve allo-IEC persistence, as warranted by different clinical indications, disease kinetics, on-target/off-tumor effects, and therapeutic cell type (T cell subtype, NK, etc.).ObjectiveThe optimal choice of candidate donors to maximize target patient population coverage and minimize cost and redundant effort in creating off-the-shelf IECT product banks is still an open problem. We propose here a solution to this problem, and test whether it would be more expensive to recruit additional donors or to prevent class I or class II HLA expression through gene editing.Study designWe developed an optimal coverage problem, combined with a graph-based algorithm to solve the donor selection problem under different, clinically plausible scenarios (having different HLA matching priorities). We then compared the efficiency of different optimization algorithms – a greedy solution, a linear programming (LP) solution, and integer linear programming (ILP) -- as well as random donor selection (average of 5 random trials) to show that an optimization can be performed at the entire population level.ResultsThe average additional population coverage per donor decrease with the number of donors, and varies with the scenario. The Greedy, LP and ILP algorithms consistently achieve the optimal coverage with far fewer donors than the random choice. In all cases, the number of randomly-selected donors required to achieve a desired coverage increases with increasing population. However, when optimal donors are selected, the number of donors required may counter-intuitively decrease with increasing population size. When comparing recruiting more donors vs gene editing, the latter was generally more expensive. When choosing donors and patients from different populations, the number of random donors required drastically increases, while the number of optimal donors does not change. Random donors fail to cover populations different from their original populations, while a small number of optimal donors from one population can cover a different population.DiscussionGraph-based coverage optimization algorithms can flexibly handle various HLA matching criteria and accommodate additional information such as KIR genotype, when such information becomes routinely available. These algorithms offer a more efficient way to develop off-the-shelf IECT product banks compared to random donor selection and offer some possibility of improved transparency and standardization in product design.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1069749/fullcoverageHLANKT cellmodeltherapies
spellingShingle Sapir Israeli
Elizabeth F. Krakow
Elizabeth F. Krakow
Martin Maiers
Martin Maiers
Corinne Summers
Corinne Summers
Corinne Summers
Yoram Louzoun
Trans-population graph-based coverage optimization of allogeneic cellular therapy
Frontiers in Immunology
coverage
HLA
NK
T cell
model
therapies
title Trans-population graph-based coverage optimization of allogeneic cellular therapy
title_full Trans-population graph-based coverage optimization of allogeneic cellular therapy
title_fullStr Trans-population graph-based coverage optimization of allogeneic cellular therapy
title_full_unstemmed Trans-population graph-based coverage optimization of allogeneic cellular therapy
title_short Trans-population graph-based coverage optimization of allogeneic cellular therapy
title_sort trans population graph based coverage optimization of allogeneic cellular therapy
topic coverage
HLA
NK
T cell
model
therapies
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1069749/full
work_keys_str_mv AT sapirisraeli transpopulationgraphbasedcoverageoptimizationofallogeneiccellulartherapy
AT elizabethfkrakow transpopulationgraphbasedcoverageoptimizationofallogeneiccellulartherapy
AT elizabethfkrakow transpopulationgraphbasedcoverageoptimizationofallogeneiccellulartherapy
AT martinmaiers transpopulationgraphbasedcoverageoptimizationofallogeneiccellulartherapy
AT martinmaiers transpopulationgraphbasedcoverageoptimizationofallogeneiccellulartherapy
AT corinnesummers transpopulationgraphbasedcoverageoptimizationofallogeneiccellulartherapy
AT corinnesummers transpopulationgraphbasedcoverageoptimizationofallogeneiccellulartherapy
AT corinnesummers transpopulationgraphbasedcoverageoptimizationofallogeneiccellulartherapy
AT yoramlouzoun transpopulationgraphbasedcoverageoptimizationofallogeneiccellulartherapy