STING Is Required in Conventional Dendritic Cells for DNA Vaccine Induction of Type I T Helper Cell- Dependent Antibody Responses

DNA vaccines elicit antibody, T helper cell responses and CD8+ T cell responses. Currently, little is known about the mechanism that DNA vaccines employ to induce adaptive immune responses. Prior studies have demonstrated that stimulator of interferon genes (STING) and conventional dendritic cells (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Justin Theophilus Ulrich-Lewis, Kevin E. Draves, Kelsey Roe, Megan A. O’Connor, Edward A. Clark, Deborah Heydenburg Fuller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Immunology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2022.861710/full
_version_ 1818061529902219264
author Justin Theophilus Ulrich-Lewis
Justin Theophilus Ulrich-Lewis
Kevin E. Draves
Kevin E. Draves
Kelsey Roe
Kelsey Roe
Megan A. O’Connor
Edward A. Clark
Edward A. Clark
Deborah Heydenburg Fuller
author_facet Justin Theophilus Ulrich-Lewis
Justin Theophilus Ulrich-Lewis
Kevin E. Draves
Kevin E. Draves
Kelsey Roe
Kelsey Roe
Megan A. O’Connor
Edward A. Clark
Edward A. Clark
Deborah Heydenburg Fuller
author_sort Justin Theophilus Ulrich-Lewis
collection DOAJ
description DNA vaccines elicit antibody, T helper cell responses and CD8+ T cell responses. Currently, little is known about the mechanism that DNA vaccines employ to induce adaptive immune responses. Prior studies have demonstrated that stimulator of interferon genes (STING) and conventional dendritic cells (cDCs) play critical roles in DNA vaccine induced antibody and T cell responses. STING activation by double stranded (dsDNA) sensing proteins initiate the production of type I interferon (IFN),but the DC-intrinsic effect of STING signaling is still unclear. Here, we investigated the role of STING within cDCs on DNA vaccine induction of antibody and T cell responses. STING knockout (STING-/-) and conditional knockout mice that lack STING in cDCs (cDC STING cKO), were immunized intramuscularly with a DNA vaccine that expressed influenza A nucleoprotein (pNP). Both STING-/- and cDC STING cKO mice had significantly lower type I T helper (Th1) type antibody (anti-NP IgG2C) responses and lower frequencies of Th1 associated T cells (NP-specific IFN-γ+CD4+ T cells) post-immunization than wild type (WT) and cDC STING littermate control mice. In contrast, all mice had similar Th2-type NP-specific (IgG1) antibody titers. STING-/- mice developed significantly lower polyfunctional CD8+ T cells than WT, cDC STING cKO and cDC STING littermate control mice. These findings suggest that STING within cDCs mediates DNA vaccine induction of type I T helper responses including IFN-γ+CD4+ T cells, and Th1-type IgG2C antibody responses. The induction of CD8+ effector cell responses also require STING, but not within cDCs. These findings are the first to show that STING is required within cDCs to mediate DNA vaccine induced Th1 immune responses and provide new insight into the mechanism whereby DNA vaccines induce Th1 responses.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T13:49:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7fa6674b841f48979e62717e444a10e7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-3224
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T13:49:46Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Immunology
spelling doaj.art-7fa6674b841f48979e62717e444a10e72022-12-22T01:46:14ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Immunology1664-32242022-04-011310.3389/fimmu.2022.861710861710STING Is Required in Conventional Dendritic Cells for DNA Vaccine Induction of Type I T Helper Cell- Dependent Antibody ResponsesJustin Theophilus Ulrich-Lewis0Justin Theophilus Ulrich-Lewis1Kevin E. Draves2Kevin E. Draves3Kelsey Roe4Kelsey Roe5Megan A. O’Connor6Edward A. Clark7Edward A. Clark8Deborah Heydenburg Fuller9Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United StatesDepartment of Immunology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United StatesDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United StatesDepartment of Immunology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United StatesDepartment of Immunology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United StatesSeattle Children's Hospital Center for Immunity and Immunotherapies Children’s Hospital, Seattle, WA, United StatesDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United StatesDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United StatesDepartment of Immunology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United StatesDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United StatesDNA vaccines elicit antibody, T helper cell responses and CD8+ T cell responses. Currently, little is known about the mechanism that DNA vaccines employ to induce adaptive immune responses. Prior studies have demonstrated that stimulator of interferon genes (STING) and conventional dendritic cells (cDCs) play critical roles in DNA vaccine induced antibody and T cell responses. STING activation by double stranded (dsDNA) sensing proteins initiate the production of type I interferon (IFN),but the DC-intrinsic effect of STING signaling is still unclear. Here, we investigated the role of STING within cDCs on DNA vaccine induction of antibody and T cell responses. STING knockout (STING-/-) and conditional knockout mice that lack STING in cDCs (cDC STING cKO), were immunized intramuscularly with a DNA vaccine that expressed influenza A nucleoprotein (pNP). Both STING-/- and cDC STING cKO mice had significantly lower type I T helper (Th1) type antibody (anti-NP IgG2C) responses and lower frequencies of Th1 associated T cells (NP-specific IFN-γ+CD4+ T cells) post-immunization than wild type (WT) and cDC STING littermate control mice. In contrast, all mice had similar Th2-type NP-specific (IgG1) antibody titers. STING-/- mice developed significantly lower polyfunctional CD8+ T cells than WT, cDC STING cKO and cDC STING littermate control mice. These findings suggest that STING within cDCs mediates DNA vaccine induction of type I T helper responses including IFN-γ+CD4+ T cells, and Th1-type IgG2C antibody responses. The induction of CD8+ effector cell responses also require STING, but not within cDCs. These findings are the first to show that STING is required within cDCs to mediate DNA vaccine induced Th1 immune responses and provide new insight into the mechanism whereby DNA vaccines induce Th1 responses.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2022.861710/fullDNA vaccineSTINGdendritic cellstype I interferoncGAS
spellingShingle Justin Theophilus Ulrich-Lewis
Justin Theophilus Ulrich-Lewis
Kevin E. Draves
Kevin E. Draves
Kelsey Roe
Kelsey Roe
Megan A. O’Connor
Edward A. Clark
Edward A. Clark
Deborah Heydenburg Fuller
STING Is Required in Conventional Dendritic Cells for DNA Vaccine Induction of Type I T Helper Cell- Dependent Antibody Responses
Frontiers in Immunology
DNA vaccine
STING
dendritic cells
type I interferon
cGAS
title STING Is Required in Conventional Dendritic Cells for DNA Vaccine Induction of Type I T Helper Cell- Dependent Antibody Responses
title_full STING Is Required in Conventional Dendritic Cells for DNA Vaccine Induction of Type I T Helper Cell- Dependent Antibody Responses
title_fullStr STING Is Required in Conventional Dendritic Cells for DNA Vaccine Induction of Type I T Helper Cell- Dependent Antibody Responses
title_full_unstemmed STING Is Required in Conventional Dendritic Cells for DNA Vaccine Induction of Type I T Helper Cell- Dependent Antibody Responses
title_short STING Is Required in Conventional Dendritic Cells for DNA Vaccine Induction of Type I T Helper Cell- Dependent Antibody Responses
title_sort sting is required in conventional dendritic cells for dna vaccine induction of type i t helper cell dependent antibody responses
topic DNA vaccine
STING
dendritic cells
type I interferon
cGAS
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2022.861710/full
work_keys_str_mv AT justintheophilusulrichlewis stingisrequiredinconventionaldendriticcellsfordnavaccineinductionoftypeithelpercelldependentantibodyresponses
AT justintheophilusulrichlewis stingisrequiredinconventionaldendriticcellsfordnavaccineinductionoftypeithelpercelldependentantibodyresponses
AT kevinedraves stingisrequiredinconventionaldendriticcellsfordnavaccineinductionoftypeithelpercelldependentantibodyresponses
AT kevinedraves stingisrequiredinconventionaldendriticcellsfordnavaccineinductionoftypeithelpercelldependentantibodyresponses
AT kelseyroe stingisrequiredinconventionaldendriticcellsfordnavaccineinductionoftypeithelpercelldependentantibodyresponses
AT kelseyroe stingisrequiredinconventionaldendriticcellsfordnavaccineinductionoftypeithelpercelldependentantibodyresponses
AT meganaoconnor stingisrequiredinconventionaldendriticcellsfordnavaccineinductionoftypeithelpercelldependentantibodyresponses
AT edwardaclark stingisrequiredinconventionaldendriticcellsfordnavaccineinductionoftypeithelpercelldependentantibodyresponses
AT edwardaclark stingisrequiredinconventionaldendriticcellsfordnavaccineinductionoftypeithelpercelldependentantibodyresponses
AT deborahheydenburgfuller stingisrequiredinconventionaldendriticcellsfordnavaccineinductionoftypeithelpercelldependentantibodyresponses