Effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on the gut microbiome and colorectal adenoma development

Abstract It has been previously reported that ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), a therapeutic bile acid, reduced risk for advanced colorectal adenoma in men but not women. Interactions between the gut microbiome and fecal bile acid composition as a factor in colorectal cancer neoplasia have been postulat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Talima Pearson, J. Gregory Caporaso, Monica Yellowhair, Nicholas A. Bokulich, Megha Padi, Denise J. Roe, Betsy C. Wertheim, Mark Linhart, Jessica A. Martinez, Cherae Bilagody, Heidie Hornstra, David S. Alberts, Peter Lance, Patricia A. Thompson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-02-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1965
_version_ 1797781052439134208
author Talima Pearson
J. Gregory Caporaso
Monica Yellowhair
Nicholas A. Bokulich
Megha Padi
Denise J. Roe
Betsy C. Wertheim
Mark Linhart
Jessica A. Martinez
Cherae Bilagody
Heidie Hornstra
David S. Alberts
Peter Lance
Patricia A. Thompson
author_facet Talima Pearson
J. Gregory Caporaso
Monica Yellowhair
Nicholas A. Bokulich
Megha Padi
Denise J. Roe
Betsy C. Wertheim
Mark Linhart
Jessica A. Martinez
Cherae Bilagody
Heidie Hornstra
David S. Alberts
Peter Lance
Patricia A. Thompson
author_sort Talima Pearson
collection DOAJ
description Abstract It has been previously reported that ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), a therapeutic bile acid, reduced risk for advanced colorectal adenoma in men but not women. Interactions between the gut microbiome and fecal bile acid composition as a factor in colorectal cancer neoplasia have been postulated but evidence is limited to small cohorts and animal studies. Using banked stool samples collected as part of a phase III randomized clinical trial of UDCA for the prevention of colorectal adenomatous polyps, we compared change in the microbiome composition after a 3‐year intervention in a subset of participants randomized to oral UDCA at 8‐10 mg/kg of body weight per day (n = 198) or placebo (n = 203). Study participants randomized to UDCA experienced compositional changes in their microbiome that were statistically more similar to other individuals in the UDCA arm than to those in the placebo arm. This reflected a UDCA‐associated shift in microbial community composition (P < 0.001), independent of sex, with no evidence of a UDCA effect on microbial richness (P > 0.05). These UDCA‐associated shifts in microbial community distance metrics from baseline to end‐of‐study were not associated with risk of any or advanced adenoma (all P > 0.05) in men or women. Separate analyses of microbial networks revealed an overrepresentation of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in the post‐UDCA arm and an inverse relationship between F prausnitzii and Ruminococcus gnavus. In men who received UDCA, the overrepresentation of F prausnitzii and underrepresentation of R gnavus were more prominent in those with no adenoma recurrence at follow‐up compared to men with recurrence. This relationship was not observed in women. Daily UDCA use modestly influences the relative abundance of microbial species in stool and affects the microbial network composition with suggestive evidence for sex‐specific effects of UDCA on stool microbial community composition as a modifier of colorectal adenoma risk.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T23:52:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8223f218e0d24b918621c7369cd70816
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7634
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T23:52:21Z
publishDate 2019-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cancer Medicine
spelling doaj.art-8223f218e0d24b918621c7369cd708162023-07-13T12:30:56ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342019-02-018261762810.1002/cam4.1965Effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on the gut microbiome and colorectal adenoma developmentTalima Pearson0J. Gregory Caporaso1Monica Yellowhair2Nicholas A. Bokulich3Megha Padi4Denise J. Roe5Betsy C. Wertheim6Mark Linhart7Jessica A. Martinez8Cherae Bilagody9Heidie Hornstra10David S. Alberts11Peter Lance12Patricia A. Thompson13Pathogen and Microbiome Institute Northern Arizona University Flagstaff ArizonaPathogen and Microbiome Institute Northern Arizona University Flagstaff ArizonaUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center University of Arizona Tucson ArizonaPathogen and Microbiome Institute Northern Arizona University Flagstaff ArizonaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology University of Arizona Tucson ArizonaUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center University of Arizona Tucson ArizonaUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center University of Arizona Tucson ArizonaPathogen and Microbiome Institute Northern Arizona University Flagstaff ArizonaUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center University of Arizona Tucson ArizonaPathogen and Microbiome Institute Northern Arizona University Flagstaff ArizonaPathogen and Microbiome Institute Northern Arizona University Flagstaff ArizonaUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center University of Arizona Tucson ArizonaUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center University of Arizona Tucson ArizonaUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center University of Arizona Tucson ArizonaAbstract It has been previously reported that ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), a therapeutic bile acid, reduced risk for advanced colorectal adenoma in men but not women. Interactions between the gut microbiome and fecal bile acid composition as a factor in colorectal cancer neoplasia have been postulated but evidence is limited to small cohorts and animal studies. Using banked stool samples collected as part of a phase III randomized clinical trial of UDCA for the prevention of colorectal adenomatous polyps, we compared change in the microbiome composition after a 3‐year intervention in a subset of participants randomized to oral UDCA at 8‐10 mg/kg of body weight per day (n = 198) or placebo (n = 203). Study participants randomized to UDCA experienced compositional changes in their microbiome that were statistically more similar to other individuals in the UDCA arm than to those in the placebo arm. This reflected a UDCA‐associated shift in microbial community composition (P < 0.001), independent of sex, with no evidence of a UDCA effect on microbial richness (P > 0.05). These UDCA‐associated shifts in microbial community distance metrics from baseline to end‐of‐study were not associated with risk of any or advanced adenoma (all P > 0.05) in men or women. Separate analyses of microbial networks revealed an overrepresentation of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in the post‐UDCA arm and an inverse relationship between F prausnitzii and Ruminococcus gnavus. In men who received UDCA, the overrepresentation of F prausnitzii and underrepresentation of R gnavus were more prominent in those with no adenoma recurrence at follow‐up compared to men with recurrence. This relationship was not observed in women. Daily UDCA use modestly influences the relative abundance of microbial species in stool and affects the microbial network composition with suggestive evidence for sex‐specific effects of UDCA on stool microbial community composition as a modifier of colorectal adenoma risk.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1965bile acidcolorectal adenomacolorectal cancergut microbiomeUrsodeoxycholic acid
spellingShingle Talima Pearson
J. Gregory Caporaso
Monica Yellowhair
Nicholas A. Bokulich
Megha Padi
Denise J. Roe
Betsy C. Wertheim
Mark Linhart
Jessica A. Martinez
Cherae Bilagody
Heidie Hornstra
David S. Alberts
Peter Lance
Patricia A. Thompson
Effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on the gut microbiome and colorectal adenoma development
Cancer Medicine
bile acid
colorectal adenoma
colorectal cancer
gut microbiome
Ursodeoxycholic acid
title Effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on the gut microbiome and colorectal adenoma development
title_full Effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on the gut microbiome and colorectal adenoma development
title_fullStr Effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on the gut microbiome and colorectal adenoma development
title_full_unstemmed Effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on the gut microbiome and colorectal adenoma development
title_short Effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on the gut microbiome and colorectal adenoma development
title_sort effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on the gut microbiome and colorectal adenoma development
topic bile acid
colorectal adenoma
colorectal cancer
gut microbiome
Ursodeoxycholic acid
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1965
work_keys_str_mv AT talimapearson effectsofursodeoxycholicacidonthegutmicrobiomeandcolorectaladenomadevelopment
AT jgregorycaporaso effectsofursodeoxycholicacidonthegutmicrobiomeandcolorectaladenomadevelopment
AT monicayellowhair effectsofursodeoxycholicacidonthegutmicrobiomeandcolorectaladenomadevelopment
AT nicholasabokulich effectsofursodeoxycholicacidonthegutmicrobiomeandcolorectaladenomadevelopment
AT meghapadi effectsofursodeoxycholicacidonthegutmicrobiomeandcolorectaladenomadevelopment
AT denisejroe effectsofursodeoxycholicacidonthegutmicrobiomeandcolorectaladenomadevelopment
AT betsycwertheim effectsofursodeoxycholicacidonthegutmicrobiomeandcolorectaladenomadevelopment
AT marklinhart effectsofursodeoxycholicacidonthegutmicrobiomeandcolorectaladenomadevelopment
AT jessicaamartinez effectsofursodeoxycholicacidonthegutmicrobiomeandcolorectaladenomadevelopment
AT cheraebilagody effectsofursodeoxycholicacidonthegutmicrobiomeandcolorectaladenomadevelopment
AT heidiehornstra effectsofursodeoxycholicacidonthegutmicrobiomeandcolorectaladenomadevelopment
AT davidsalberts effectsofursodeoxycholicacidonthegutmicrobiomeandcolorectaladenomadevelopment
AT peterlance effectsofursodeoxycholicacidonthegutmicrobiomeandcolorectaladenomadevelopment
AT patriciaathompson effectsofursodeoxycholicacidonthegutmicrobiomeandcolorectaladenomadevelopment