Economic Evaluation of Health Interventions: A Critical Review

Background: Economic evaluation is used for the optimal allocation of resources in the health sector. While a large number of economic evaluation studies have been conducted, there is less critical review of these studies. We critically examined the economic evaluation studies of preventive health...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ali Mohammad Mosadeghrad, Ebrahim Jaafaripooyan, Mahmoud Zamandi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2022-10-01
Series:Iranian Journal of Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/view/22316
_version_ 1797990180428185600
author Ali Mohammad Mosadeghrad
Ebrahim Jaafaripooyan
Mahmoud Zamandi
author_facet Ali Mohammad Mosadeghrad
Ebrahim Jaafaripooyan
Mahmoud Zamandi
author_sort Ali Mohammad Mosadeghrad
collection DOAJ
description Background: Economic evaluation is used for the optimal allocation of resources in the health sector. While a large number of economic evaluation studies have been conducted, there is less critical review of these studies. We critically examined the economic evaluation studies of preventive health interventions. Methods: The study was carried out using critical review method. Seven databases (i.e., PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, Science Direct, Scopus, Springer Link, and Elsevier) were searched to find articles on economic evaluation of health interventions published from 1985 to 2018. In addition, the references of retrieved studies were hand screened for articles that were not indexed in these databases. Finally, 206 articles, including 33 cost- benefit analysis, 146 cost- effectiveness analysis, and 27 cost- utility analysis were included in this study. These studies were critically evaluated using a checklist of 11 criteria. Results: Only 20% of the studies met all the methodological criteria of health economic evaluation. The cost perspective, costs type, cost data source, and cost measurement were not explained and discussed in 17%, 20%, 5%, and 33% of studies respectively. Outcome data sources and outcome valuation method were only mentioned in 53% and 69% of studies. The sensitivity analysis and results’ generalizability were not reported in 16% and 46% of studies. Conclusion: The quality of economic evaluation studies is low, and it can be misleading if resource allocation decisions are made using this evidence. Authors should use valid protocols to conduct and report economic evaluation studies, and journals’ editors should use valid checklists to evaluate these articles.  
first_indexed 2024-04-11T08:32:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-83250a6cb9154d88b5984aff61ccc8d4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2251-6085
2251-6093
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T08:32:28Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Iranian Journal of Public Health
spelling doaj.art-83250a6cb9154d88b5984aff61ccc8d42022-12-22T04:34:28ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesIranian Journal of Public Health2251-60852251-60932022-10-015110Economic Evaluation of Health Interventions: A Critical ReviewAli Mohammad Mosadeghrad0Ebrahim Jaafaripooyan1Mahmoud Zamandi2Department of Health Management & Economics, Health Information Management Research Center, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranDepartment of Health Management & Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranDepartment of Health Management & Economics, Health Information Management Research Center, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Background: Economic evaluation is used for the optimal allocation of resources in the health sector. While a large number of economic evaluation studies have been conducted, there is less critical review of these studies. We critically examined the economic evaluation studies of preventive health interventions. Methods: The study was carried out using critical review method. Seven databases (i.e., PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, Science Direct, Scopus, Springer Link, and Elsevier) were searched to find articles on economic evaluation of health interventions published from 1985 to 2018. In addition, the references of retrieved studies were hand screened for articles that were not indexed in these databases. Finally, 206 articles, including 33 cost- benefit analysis, 146 cost- effectiveness analysis, and 27 cost- utility analysis were included in this study. These studies were critically evaluated using a checklist of 11 criteria. Results: Only 20% of the studies met all the methodological criteria of health economic evaluation. The cost perspective, costs type, cost data source, and cost measurement were not explained and discussed in 17%, 20%, 5%, and 33% of studies respectively. Outcome data sources and outcome valuation method were only mentioned in 53% and 69% of studies. The sensitivity analysis and results’ generalizability were not reported in 16% and 46% of studies. Conclusion: The quality of economic evaluation studies is low, and it can be misleading if resource allocation decisions are made using this evidence. Authors should use valid protocols to conduct and report economic evaluation studies, and journals’ editors should use valid checklists to evaluate these articles.   https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/view/22316Economic evaluationCost-benefit analysisCost-effectiveness analysisCost-utility analysis
spellingShingle Ali Mohammad Mosadeghrad
Ebrahim Jaafaripooyan
Mahmoud Zamandi
Economic Evaluation of Health Interventions: A Critical Review
Iranian Journal of Public Health
Economic evaluation
Cost-benefit analysis
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Cost-utility analysis
title Economic Evaluation of Health Interventions: A Critical Review
title_full Economic Evaluation of Health Interventions: A Critical Review
title_fullStr Economic Evaluation of Health Interventions: A Critical Review
title_full_unstemmed Economic Evaluation of Health Interventions: A Critical Review
title_short Economic Evaluation of Health Interventions: A Critical Review
title_sort economic evaluation of health interventions a critical review
topic Economic evaluation
Cost-benefit analysis
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Cost-utility analysis
url https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/view/22316
work_keys_str_mv AT alimohammadmosadeghrad economicevaluationofhealthinterventionsacriticalreview
AT ebrahimjaafaripooyan economicevaluationofhealthinterventionsacriticalreview
AT mahmoudzamandi economicevaluationofhealthinterventionsacriticalreview