A Formative Evaluation with Extension Educators: Exploring Implementation Approaches Using Web-based Methods

The article describes the formative evaluation of a bullying prevention program called Be SAFE from the perspective of Extension educators. Twelve regional and county educators from Family and Child Development and 4-H Youth Development participated in our study. We used a web-based, mixed methods a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adrienne M. Duke, Shnovia Joy Maxwell Scott
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mississippi State University 2017-10-01
Series:Journal of Human Sciences and Extension
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/jhse/vol5/iss3/9/
_version_ 1828095593889660928
author Adrienne M. Duke
Shnovia Joy Maxwell Scott
author_facet Adrienne M. Duke
Shnovia Joy Maxwell Scott
author_sort Adrienne M. Duke
collection DOAJ
description The article describes the formative evaluation of a bullying prevention program called Be SAFE from the perspective of Extension educators. Twelve regional and county educators from Family and Child Development and 4-H Youth Development participated in our study. We used a web-based, mixed methods approach, utilizing both Qualtrics, an online survey software platform, and Scopia, a video conferencing application, to collect survey data and do a focus group. The results of the survey show that three activities, Clear Mind, Mud Mind, Take a Stand, and The Relationship Continuum, were perceived as garnering the most participation from students. However, focus group data indicated that while there was often a high level of participation, the subject matter of the curriculum was too advanced for students in the fifth grade and that classroom size affected how well educators could teach lessons. Furthermore, school access was not an implementation challenge, but the amount of days available to implement the full curriculum was sometimes limited. The data collected through this formative evaluation were used to improve implementation efforts. The process outlined in this article can be used as a model to help program leaders who are interested in using web-based tools to evaluate implementation processes.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T07:16:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-88ee7e3ad0c140f9bd3d7167b2ed3301
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2325-5226
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T07:16:54Z
publishDate 2017-10-01
publisher Mississippi State University
record_format Article
series Journal of Human Sciences and Extension
spelling doaj.art-88ee7e3ad0c140f9bd3d7167b2ed33012022-12-22T04:37:56ZengMississippi State UniversityJournal of Human Sciences and Extension2325-52262017-10-0153122131https://doi.org/10.54718/CAKY2103A Formative Evaluation with Extension Educators: Exploring Implementation Approaches Using Web-based MethodsAdrienne M. Duke 0Shnovia Joy Maxwell Scott 1Auburn University Auburn University The article describes the formative evaluation of a bullying prevention program called Be SAFE from the perspective of Extension educators. Twelve regional and county educators from Family and Child Development and 4-H Youth Development participated in our study. We used a web-based, mixed methods approach, utilizing both Qualtrics, an online survey software platform, and Scopia, a video conferencing application, to collect survey data and do a focus group. The results of the survey show that three activities, Clear Mind, Mud Mind, Take a Stand, and The Relationship Continuum, were perceived as garnering the most participation from students. However, focus group data indicated that while there was often a high level of participation, the subject matter of the curriculum was too advanced for students in the fifth grade and that classroom size affected how well educators could teach lessons. Furthermore, school access was not an implementation challenge, but the amount of days available to implement the full curriculum was sometimes limited. The data collected through this formative evaluation were used to improve implementation efforts. The process outlined in this article can be used as a model to help program leaders who are interested in using web-based tools to evaluate implementation processes. https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/jhse/vol5/iss3/9/evaluationformative evaluationimplementation researchsynchronous focus grouponline survey
spellingShingle Adrienne M. Duke
Shnovia Joy Maxwell Scott
A Formative Evaluation with Extension Educators: Exploring Implementation Approaches Using Web-based Methods
Journal of Human Sciences and Extension
evaluation
formative evaluation
implementation research
synchronous focus group
online survey
title A Formative Evaluation with Extension Educators: Exploring Implementation Approaches Using Web-based Methods
title_full A Formative Evaluation with Extension Educators: Exploring Implementation Approaches Using Web-based Methods
title_fullStr A Formative Evaluation with Extension Educators: Exploring Implementation Approaches Using Web-based Methods
title_full_unstemmed A Formative Evaluation with Extension Educators: Exploring Implementation Approaches Using Web-based Methods
title_short A Formative Evaluation with Extension Educators: Exploring Implementation Approaches Using Web-based Methods
title_sort formative evaluation with extension educators exploring implementation approaches using web based methods
topic evaluation
formative evaluation
implementation research
synchronous focus group
online survey
url https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/jhse/vol5/iss3/9/
work_keys_str_mv AT adriennemduke aformativeevaluationwithextensioneducatorsexploringimplementationapproachesusingwebbasedmethods
AT shnoviajoymaxwellscott aformativeevaluationwithextensioneducatorsexploringimplementationapproachesusingwebbasedmethods
AT adriennemduke formativeevaluationwithextensioneducatorsexploringimplementationapproachesusingwebbasedmethods
AT shnoviajoymaxwellscott formativeevaluationwithextensioneducatorsexploringimplementationapproachesusingwebbasedmethods