The Commonality of Loss Aversion across Procedures and Stimuli.

Individuals tend to give losses approximately 2-fold the weight that they give gains. Such approximations of loss aversion (LA) are almost always measured in the stimulus domain of money, rather than objects or pictures. Recent work on preference-based decision-making with a schedule-less keypress t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sang Lee, Myung J Lee, Byoung W Kim, Jodi M Gilman, John K Kuster, Anne J Blood, Camelia M Kuhnen, Hans C Breiter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4579072?pdf=render
_version_ 1818081467636383744
author Sang Lee
Myung J Lee
Byoung W Kim
Jodi M Gilman
John K Kuster
Anne J Blood
Camelia M Kuhnen
Hans C Breiter
author_facet Sang Lee
Myung J Lee
Byoung W Kim
Jodi M Gilman
John K Kuster
Anne J Blood
Camelia M Kuhnen
Hans C Breiter
author_sort Sang Lee
collection DOAJ
description Individuals tend to give losses approximately 2-fold the weight that they give gains. Such approximations of loss aversion (LA) are almost always measured in the stimulus domain of money, rather than objects or pictures. Recent work on preference-based decision-making with a schedule-less keypress task (relative preference theory, RPT) has provided a mathematical formulation for LA similar to that in prospect theory (PT), but makes no parametric assumptions in the computation of LA, uses a variable tied to communication theory (i.e., the Shannon entropy or information), and works readily with non-monetary stimuli. We evaluated if these distinct frameworks described similar LA in healthy subjects, and found that LA during the anticipation phase of the PT-based task correlated significantly with LA related to the RPT-based task. Given the ease with which non-monetary stimuli can be used on the Internet, or in animal studies, these findings open an extensive range of applications for the study of loss aversion. Furthermore, the emergence of methodology that can be used to measure preference for both social stimuli and money brings a common framework to the evaluation of preference in both social psychology and behavioral economics.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T19:06:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-89061e269c9d4719acd7310d49b03b57
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T19:06:40Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-89061e269c9d4719acd7310d49b03b572022-12-22T01:36:53ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01109e013521610.1371/journal.pone.0135216The Commonality of Loss Aversion across Procedures and Stimuli.Sang LeeMyung J LeeByoung W KimJodi M GilmanJohn K KusterAnne J BloodCamelia M KuhnenHans C BreiterIndividuals tend to give losses approximately 2-fold the weight that they give gains. Such approximations of loss aversion (LA) are almost always measured in the stimulus domain of money, rather than objects or pictures. Recent work on preference-based decision-making with a schedule-less keypress task (relative preference theory, RPT) has provided a mathematical formulation for LA similar to that in prospect theory (PT), but makes no parametric assumptions in the computation of LA, uses a variable tied to communication theory (i.e., the Shannon entropy or information), and works readily with non-monetary stimuli. We evaluated if these distinct frameworks described similar LA in healthy subjects, and found that LA during the anticipation phase of the PT-based task correlated significantly with LA related to the RPT-based task. Given the ease with which non-monetary stimuli can be used on the Internet, or in animal studies, these findings open an extensive range of applications for the study of loss aversion. Furthermore, the emergence of methodology that can be used to measure preference for both social stimuli and money brings a common framework to the evaluation of preference in both social psychology and behavioral economics.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4579072?pdf=render
spellingShingle Sang Lee
Myung J Lee
Byoung W Kim
Jodi M Gilman
John K Kuster
Anne J Blood
Camelia M Kuhnen
Hans C Breiter
The Commonality of Loss Aversion across Procedures and Stimuli.
PLoS ONE
title The Commonality of Loss Aversion across Procedures and Stimuli.
title_full The Commonality of Loss Aversion across Procedures and Stimuli.
title_fullStr The Commonality of Loss Aversion across Procedures and Stimuli.
title_full_unstemmed The Commonality of Loss Aversion across Procedures and Stimuli.
title_short The Commonality of Loss Aversion across Procedures and Stimuli.
title_sort commonality of loss aversion across procedures and stimuli
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4579072?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT sanglee thecommonalityoflossaversionacrossproceduresandstimuli
AT myungjlee thecommonalityoflossaversionacrossproceduresandstimuli
AT byoungwkim thecommonalityoflossaversionacrossproceduresandstimuli
AT jodimgilman thecommonalityoflossaversionacrossproceduresandstimuli
AT johnkkuster thecommonalityoflossaversionacrossproceduresandstimuli
AT annejblood thecommonalityoflossaversionacrossproceduresandstimuli
AT cameliamkuhnen thecommonalityoflossaversionacrossproceduresandstimuli
AT hanscbreiter thecommonalityoflossaversionacrossproceduresandstimuli
AT sanglee commonalityoflossaversionacrossproceduresandstimuli
AT myungjlee commonalityoflossaversionacrossproceduresandstimuli
AT byoungwkim commonalityoflossaversionacrossproceduresandstimuli
AT jodimgilman commonalityoflossaversionacrossproceduresandstimuli
AT johnkkuster commonalityoflossaversionacrossproceduresandstimuli
AT annejblood commonalityoflossaversionacrossproceduresandstimuli
AT cameliamkuhnen commonalityoflossaversionacrossproceduresandstimuli
AT hanscbreiter commonalityoflossaversionacrossproceduresandstimuli