Analysis of Wild Type LbCpf1 Protein, and PAM Recognition Variants, in a Cellular Context

Nucleases used in genome engineering induce hydrolysis of DNA phosphate backbone in a sequence-specific manner. So far CRISPR-Cas, the RNA-guided nucleases, is the most advanced genome engineering system. The CRISPR nucleases allows recognition of a particular genomic sequence with two distinct mole...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ujin Shin, Vincent Brondani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Genetics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2020.571591/full
_version_ 1818961852647866368
author Ujin Shin
Vincent Brondani
author_facet Ujin Shin
Vincent Brondani
author_sort Ujin Shin
collection DOAJ
description Nucleases used in genome engineering induce hydrolysis of DNA phosphate backbone in a sequence-specific manner. So far CRISPR-Cas, the RNA-guided nucleases, is the most advanced genome engineering system. The CRISPR nucleases allows recognition of a particular genomic sequence with two distinct molecular interactions: first, by direct interaction between the nuclease and the protospacer-adjacent motif, wherein discrete amino acids interact with DNA base pairs; and second, by hybridization of the guide RNA with the target DNA sequence. Here we report the application of the single strand annealing cellular assay to analyze and quantify nuclease activity of wild type and mutant CRISPR-Cpf1. Using this heterologous marker system based on GFP activity, we observed a comparable PAM recognition selectivity with the NGS analysis. The heterologous marker system has revealed that LbCpf1 is a more specific nuclease than AsCpf1 in a cellular context. We controlled the in vitro activity of the Cpf1 nuclease complexes expressed in mammalian cells and demonstrated that they are responsible of the DNA cleavage at the target site. In addition, we generated and tested LbCpf1 variants with several combinations of mutations at the PAM-recognition positions G532, K538 and Y542. Finally, we showed that the results of the in vitro DNA cleavage assay with the wild type and mutants LbCpf1 corroborate with the selection of 6TG resistant cells associated to the genomic disruption of hprt gene.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T12:20:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8b4fe63b35d24732bb0c5ca9efb173b5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-8021
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T12:20:01Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Genetics
spelling doaj.art-8b4fe63b35d24732bb0c5ca9efb173b52022-12-21T19:41:00ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Genetics1664-80212021-01-011110.3389/fgene.2020.571591571591Analysis of Wild Type LbCpf1 Protein, and PAM Recognition Variants, in a Cellular ContextUjin ShinVincent BrondaniNucleases used in genome engineering induce hydrolysis of DNA phosphate backbone in a sequence-specific manner. So far CRISPR-Cas, the RNA-guided nucleases, is the most advanced genome engineering system. The CRISPR nucleases allows recognition of a particular genomic sequence with two distinct molecular interactions: first, by direct interaction between the nuclease and the protospacer-adjacent motif, wherein discrete amino acids interact with DNA base pairs; and second, by hybridization of the guide RNA with the target DNA sequence. Here we report the application of the single strand annealing cellular assay to analyze and quantify nuclease activity of wild type and mutant CRISPR-Cpf1. Using this heterologous marker system based on GFP activity, we observed a comparable PAM recognition selectivity with the NGS analysis. The heterologous marker system has revealed that LbCpf1 is a more specific nuclease than AsCpf1 in a cellular context. We controlled the in vitro activity of the Cpf1 nuclease complexes expressed in mammalian cells and demonstrated that they are responsible of the DNA cleavage at the target site. In addition, we generated and tested LbCpf1 variants with several combinations of mutations at the PAM-recognition positions G532, K538 and Y542. Finally, we showed that the results of the in vitro DNA cleavage assay with the wild type and mutants LbCpf1 corroborate with the selection of 6TG resistant cells associated to the genomic disruption of hprt gene.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2020.571591/fullCpf1genome engineeringPAMspecificityselectivity
spellingShingle Ujin Shin
Vincent Brondani
Analysis of Wild Type LbCpf1 Protein, and PAM Recognition Variants, in a Cellular Context
Frontiers in Genetics
Cpf1
genome engineering
PAM
specificity
selectivity
title Analysis of Wild Type LbCpf1 Protein, and PAM Recognition Variants, in a Cellular Context
title_full Analysis of Wild Type LbCpf1 Protein, and PAM Recognition Variants, in a Cellular Context
title_fullStr Analysis of Wild Type LbCpf1 Protein, and PAM Recognition Variants, in a Cellular Context
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Wild Type LbCpf1 Protein, and PAM Recognition Variants, in a Cellular Context
title_short Analysis of Wild Type LbCpf1 Protein, and PAM Recognition Variants, in a Cellular Context
title_sort analysis of wild type lbcpf1 protein and pam recognition variants in a cellular context
topic Cpf1
genome engineering
PAM
specificity
selectivity
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2020.571591/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ujinshin analysisofwildtypelbcpf1proteinandpamrecognitionvariantsinacellularcontext
AT vincentbrondani analysisofwildtypelbcpf1proteinandpamrecognitionvariantsinacellularcontext