Marketing of sugar-sweetened beverages to youth through U.S. university pouring rights contracts

Child-targeted marketing can influence children’s food preferences and childhood consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) is associated with negative health outcomes in both childhood and adulthood. This study explores how beverage companies are using pouring rights contracts (PRCs) with U.S....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katherine Marx, Eva Greenthal, Sara Ribakove, Elyse R. Grossman, Stephanie Lucas, Martha Ruffin, Sara E. Benjamin-Neelon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-02-01
Series:Preventive Medicine Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221133552100379X
_version_ 1818330317910441984
author Katherine Marx
Eva Greenthal
Sara Ribakove
Elyse R. Grossman
Stephanie Lucas
Martha Ruffin
Sara E. Benjamin-Neelon
author_facet Katherine Marx
Eva Greenthal
Sara Ribakove
Elyse R. Grossman
Stephanie Lucas
Martha Ruffin
Sara E. Benjamin-Neelon
author_sort Katherine Marx
collection DOAJ
description Child-targeted marketing can influence children’s food preferences and childhood consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) is associated with negative health outcomes in both childhood and adulthood. This study explores how beverage companies are using pouring rights contracts (PRCs) with U.S. public universities to market SSBs to youth under 18 years of age.We obtained 139 PRCs (64 Coca-Cola, 67 Pepsi, 8 Gatorade) from 132 universities between June 2019 and August 2020. Each contract was coded by two reviewers who extracted quotes relevant to youth-targeted marketing activities.Twenty-two contracts in our sample (16%) contained a total of 25 provisions related to youth-targeted marketing. Nearly all youth-targeted marketing provisions (n = 24 of 25) were tied to university athletics. Most provisions (n = 19) described the marketing of specific beverages or involved the use of brand names that are also beverages (e.g., “Gatorade,” “Coca-Cola”). Fifteen contracts included advertising or support for youth summer camps; five contracts allowed the beverage company to sponsor free experiences for children at university athletic events; three contracts allowed advertising at high school athletic events hosted at university facilities; and two contracts established programs for “underprivileged” or “disadvantaged” youth. Five contracts acknowledged that their provisions may be affected by laws or self-regulatory policies that limit advertising to children.Beverage companies should reconsider marketing to youth through PRCs, universities should carefully consider PRCs with youth-targeted provisions, and the government should further regulate and prevent youth-targeted marketing.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T13:02:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8b8c2334e1b54e93941572dc7e5139d4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2211-3355
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T13:02:02Z
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Preventive Medicine Reports
spelling doaj.art-8b8c2334e1b54e93941572dc7e5139d42022-12-21T23:44:59ZengElsevierPreventive Medicine Reports2211-33552022-02-0125101688Marketing of sugar-sweetened beverages to youth through U.S. university pouring rights contractsKatherine Marx0Eva Greenthal1Sara Ribakove2Elyse R. Grossman3Stephanie Lucas4Martha Ruffin5Sara E. Benjamin-Neelon6Center for Science in the Public Interest, 1220 L St NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20005, USA; Corresponding author.Center for Science in the Public Interest, 1220 L St NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20005, USACenter for Science in the Public Interest, 1220 L St NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20005, USADepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health 615 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, USADepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health 615 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, USADepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health 615 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, USADepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health 615 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Department of International Health, Division of Human Nutrition, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, USAChild-targeted marketing can influence children’s food preferences and childhood consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) is associated with negative health outcomes in both childhood and adulthood. This study explores how beverage companies are using pouring rights contracts (PRCs) with U.S. public universities to market SSBs to youth under 18 years of age.We obtained 139 PRCs (64 Coca-Cola, 67 Pepsi, 8 Gatorade) from 132 universities between June 2019 and August 2020. Each contract was coded by two reviewers who extracted quotes relevant to youth-targeted marketing activities.Twenty-two contracts in our sample (16%) contained a total of 25 provisions related to youth-targeted marketing. Nearly all youth-targeted marketing provisions (n = 24 of 25) were tied to university athletics. Most provisions (n = 19) described the marketing of specific beverages or involved the use of brand names that are also beverages (e.g., “Gatorade,” “Coca-Cola”). Fifteen contracts included advertising or support for youth summer camps; five contracts allowed the beverage company to sponsor free experiences for children at university athletic events; three contracts allowed advertising at high school athletic events hosted at university facilities; and two contracts established programs for “underprivileged” or “disadvantaged” youth. Five contracts acknowledged that their provisions may be affected by laws or self-regulatory policies that limit advertising to children.Beverage companies should reconsider marketing to youth through PRCs, universities should carefully consider PRCs with youth-targeted provisions, and the government should further regulate and prevent youth-targeted marketing.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221133552100379XFood marketing to childrenPouring rights contractsSugar-sweetened beverage marketing
spellingShingle Katherine Marx
Eva Greenthal
Sara Ribakove
Elyse R. Grossman
Stephanie Lucas
Martha Ruffin
Sara E. Benjamin-Neelon
Marketing of sugar-sweetened beverages to youth through U.S. university pouring rights contracts
Preventive Medicine Reports
Food marketing to children
Pouring rights contracts
Sugar-sweetened beverage marketing
title Marketing of sugar-sweetened beverages to youth through U.S. university pouring rights contracts
title_full Marketing of sugar-sweetened beverages to youth through U.S. university pouring rights contracts
title_fullStr Marketing of sugar-sweetened beverages to youth through U.S. university pouring rights contracts
title_full_unstemmed Marketing of sugar-sweetened beverages to youth through U.S. university pouring rights contracts
title_short Marketing of sugar-sweetened beverages to youth through U.S. university pouring rights contracts
title_sort marketing of sugar sweetened beverages to youth through u s university pouring rights contracts
topic Food marketing to children
Pouring rights contracts
Sugar-sweetened beverage marketing
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221133552100379X
work_keys_str_mv AT katherinemarx marketingofsugarsweetenedbeveragestoyouththroughusuniversitypouringrightscontracts
AT evagreenthal marketingofsugarsweetenedbeveragestoyouththroughusuniversitypouringrightscontracts
AT sararibakove marketingofsugarsweetenedbeveragestoyouththroughusuniversitypouringrightscontracts
AT elysergrossman marketingofsugarsweetenedbeveragestoyouththroughusuniversitypouringrightscontracts
AT stephanielucas marketingofsugarsweetenedbeveragestoyouththroughusuniversitypouringrightscontracts
AT martharuffin marketingofsugarsweetenedbeveragestoyouththroughusuniversitypouringrightscontracts
AT saraebenjaminneelon marketingofsugarsweetenedbeveragestoyouththroughusuniversitypouringrightscontracts