Migration and transformation: a sociomaterial analysis of practitioners’ experiences with online exams

Many institutions are making the move from pen and paper to online examinations, but the literature offers relatively few critical reflections on the ramifications of such a shift. This research presents evidence of the ways in which the social and human practices of online exams are deeply entangle...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stuart Allan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association for Learning Technology 2020-01-01
Series:Research in Learning Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.alt.ac.uk/index.php/rlt/article/view/2279/2615
_version_ 1819155250566660096
author Stuart Allan
author_facet Stuart Allan
author_sort Stuart Allan
collection DOAJ
description Many institutions are making the move from pen and paper to online examinations, but the literature offers relatively few critical reflections on the ramifications of such a shift. This research presents evidence of the ways in which the social and human practices of online exams are deeply entangled with the material and technological, and cautions against the reinscribing of essentialist or instrumentalist assumptions about technology in assessment practices. Through semi-structured interviews with eight practitioners in Norway, the Netherlands, the UK and Ireland, it analyses the impact, dimensions and limitations of two main discourses: migration, whereby exam technologies are assumed to be neutral instruments used independently by humans to realise their preordained intentions; and transformation, whereby the essential and inalienable qualities of technologies can be released to ‘transform’ or ‘enhance’ assessment. Its findings indicate that: (1) exam technologies are neither inherently neutral nor essentially transformational; (2) implementation projects underpinned by the migration discourse can be much more complex and resource-intensive than anticipated; and (3) ‘transformative’ change may be value-laden and driven by assumptions. Given the complex and entangled nature of online exams, practitioners are encouraged to think creatively about how assessment strategies align with educational goals, to consider the limitations of current discourses and to analyse critically the relational and performative roles of digital technologies.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T15:33:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8bb70418f7ba462783be1884dc029245
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2156-7077
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T15:33:59Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Association for Learning Technology
record_format Article
series Research in Learning Technology
spelling doaj.art-8bb70418f7ba462783be1884dc0292452022-12-21T18:21:19ZengAssociation for Learning TechnologyResearch in Learning Technology2156-70772020-01-0128011410.25304/rlt.v28.22792279Migration and transformation: a sociomaterial analysis of practitioners’ experiences with online examsStuart Allan0Director of Online Learning, Edinburgh Business School, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, ScotlandMany institutions are making the move from pen and paper to online examinations, but the literature offers relatively few critical reflections on the ramifications of such a shift. This research presents evidence of the ways in which the social and human practices of online exams are deeply entangled with the material and technological, and cautions against the reinscribing of essentialist or instrumentalist assumptions about technology in assessment practices. Through semi-structured interviews with eight practitioners in Norway, the Netherlands, the UK and Ireland, it analyses the impact, dimensions and limitations of two main discourses: migration, whereby exam technologies are assumed to be neutral instruments used independently by humans to realise their preordained intentions; and transformation, whereby the essential and inalienable qualities of technologies can be released to ‘transform’ or ‘enhance’ assessment. Its findings indicate that: (1) exam technologies are neither inherently neutral nor essentially transformational; (2) implementation projects underpinned by the migration discourse can be much more complex and resource-intensive than anticipated; and (3) ‘transformative’ change may be value-laden and driven by assumptions. Given the complex and entangled nature of online exams, practitioners are encouraged to think creatively about how assessment strategies align with educational goals, to consider the limitations of current discourses and to analyse critically the relational and performative roles of digital technologies.https://journal.alt.ac.uk/index.php/rlt/article/view/2279/2615assessmentdigital examsonline assessmentonline examssociomateriality
spellingShingle Stuart Allan
Migration and transformation: a sociomaterial analysis of practitioners’ experiences with online exams
Research in Learning Technology
assessment
digital exams
online assessment
online exams
sociomateriality
title Migration and transformation: a sociomaterial analysis of practitioners’ experiences with online exams
title_full Migration and transformation: a sociomaterial analysis of practitioners’ experiences with online exams
title_fullStr Migration and transformation: a sociomaterial analysis of practitioners’ experiences with online exams
title_full_unstemmed Migration and transformation: a sociomaterial analysis of practitioners’ experiences with online exams
title_short Migration and transformation: a sociomaterial analysis of practitioners’ experiences with online exams
title_sort migration and transformation a sociomaterial analysis of practitioners experiences with online exams
topic assessment
digital exams
online assessment
online exams
sociomateriality
url https://journal.alt.ac.uk/index.php/rlt/article/view/2279/2615
work_keys_str_mv AT stuartallan migrationandtransformationasociomaterialanalysisofpractitionersexperienceswithonlineexams