Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory in Measuring Validity of Peer-Grading in Massive Open Online Courses

The article presents the results of research on validity of peer-review assignments in massive open online courses within the framework of classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT). CTT-based analysis yielded data on convergent validity of the peer-review assignment, the low level o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Daria Kravchenko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) 2018-11-01
Series:Вопросы образования
Subjects:
Online Access:https://vo.hse.ru/article/view/15579
Description
Summary:The article presents the results of research on validity of peer-review assignments in massive open online courses within the framework of classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT). CTT-based analysis yielded data on convergent validity of the peer-review assignment, the low level of its criterion validity, and rater disagreement. IRT-based analysis revealed rater bias and established that experts largely tend to be lenient and overrate their peers. The findings are used to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the psychometric theories in question and the opportunities for combining the two.
ISSN:1814-9545
2412-4354