Critiquing a Qualitative Study Using Tracy’s Big-tent Criteria
This paper critiques an article, which sheds light on the internationalisation of the curriculum. When classified within the main Western paradigms: positivism, interpretivism, critical theory and postmodernism, her article can be within the interpretivism. These paradigms are highlighted in this pa...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
OpenED Network
2019-05-01
|
| Series: | Research in Social Sciences and Technology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ressat.org/index.php/ressat/article/view/396 |
| _version_ | 1797924274951946240 |
|---|---|
| author | Saud saif Albusaidi |
| author_facet | Saud saif Albusaidi |
| author_sort | Saud saif Albusaidi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This paper critiques an article, which sheds light on the internationalisation of the curriculum. When classified within the main Western paradigms: positivism, interpretivism, critical theory and postmodernism, her article can be within the interpretivism. These paradigms are highlighted in this paper to engage the reader in critical reflection and to emphasise the differences between these paradigms. Big-tent markers, which are applied to evaluate the quality of qualitative research, are then critically implemented to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of that article in line with providing relevant suggestions. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T15:00:01Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-8db26520c4344460aac6d3afe2413eae |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2468-6891 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T15:00:01Z |
| publishDate | 2019-05-01 |
| publisher | OpenED Network |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Research in Social Sciences and Technology |
| spelling | doaj.art-8db26520c4344460aac6d3afe2413eae2023-02-15T16:07:10ZengOpenED NetworkResearch in Social Sciences and Technology2468-68912019-05-014110.46303/ressat.04.01.6Critiquing a Qualitative Study Using Tracy’s Big-tent CriteriaSaud saif Albusaidi0University of BristolThis paper critiques an article, which sheds light on the internationalisation of the curriculum. When classified within the main Western paradigms: positivism, interpretivism, critical theory and postmodernism, her article can be within the interpretivism. These paradigms are highlighted in this paper to engage the reader in critical reflection and to emphasise the differences between these paradigms. Big-tent markers, which are applied to evaluate the quality of qualitative research, are then critically implemented to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of that article in line with providing relevant suggestions.https://ressat.org/index.php/ressat/article/view/396International students, Internationalisation, internationalisation of the curriculum, Paradigm, Interpretivism, Big-tent markers |
| spellingShingle | Saud saif Albusaidi Critiquing a Qualitative Study Using Tracy’s Big-tent Criteria Research in Social Sciences and Technology International students, Internationalisation, internationalisation of the curriculum, Paradigm, Interpretivism, Big-tent markers |
| title | Critiquing a Qualitative Study Using Tracy’s Big-tent Criteria |
| title_full | Critiquing a Qualitative Study Using Tracy’s Big-tent Criteria |
| title_fullStr | Critiquing a Qualitative Study Using Tracy’s Big-tent Criteria |
| title_full_unstemmed | Critiquing a Qualitative Study Using Tracy’s Big-tent Criteria |
| title_short | Critiquing a Qualitative Study Using Tracy’s Big-tent Criteria |
| title_sort | critiquing a qualitative study using tracy s big tent criteria |
| topic | International students, Internationalisation, internationalisation of the curriculum, Paradigm, Interpretivism, Big-tent markers |
| url | https://ressat.org/index.php/ressat/article/view/396 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT saudsaifalbusaidi critiquingaqualitativestudyusingtracysbigtentcriteria |