Exploring faculty perspectives on open access at a medium-sized, American doctoral university
Faculty hold widely varying perspectives on the benefits and challenges afforded by open access (OA) publishing. In the United States, conversations on OA models and strategy have been dominated by scholars affiliated with Carnegie R1 institutions. This article reports findings from interviews condu...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ubiquity Press
2023-07-01
|
Series: | Insights: The UKSG Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://account.insights.uksg.org/index.php/up-j-i/article/view/620 |
_version_ | 1797748838511935488 |
---|---|
author | Rachel E. Scott Julie A. Murphy Cassie Thayer-Styes Chad E. Buckley Anne Shelley |
author_facet | Rachel E. Scott Julie A. Murphy Cassie Thayer-Styes Chad E. Buckley Anne Shelley |
author_sort | Rachel E. Scott |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Faculty hold widely varying perspectives on the benefits and challenges afforded by open access (OA) publishing. In the United States, conversations on OA models and strategy have been dominated by scholars affiliated with Carnegie R1 institutions. This article reports findings from interviews conducted with faculty at a Carnegie R2 institution, highlighting disciplinary and individual perspectives on the high costs and rich rewards afforded by OA. The results reiterate the persistence of a high degree of skepticism regarding the quality of peer review and business models associated with OA publishing. By exploring scholars’ perceptions of and experiences with OA publishing and their comfort using or sharing unpublished, publicly available content, the authors highlight the degree to which OA approaches must remain flexible, iterative and multifaceted – no single solution can begin to accommodate the rich and varying needs of individual stakeholders. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T16:10:37Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-8ed440a582194da59989ca7cf5d423f3 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2048-7754 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T16:10:37Z |
publishDate | 2023-07-01 |
publisher | Ubiquity Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Insights: The UKSG Journal |
spelling | doaj.art-8ed440a582194da59989ca7cf5d423f32023-08-09T14:06:57ZengUbiquity PressInsights: The UKSG Journal2048-77542023-07-0136141410.1629/uksg.620618Exploring faculty perspectives on open access at a medium-sized, American doctoral universityRachel E. Scott0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5847-3378Julie A. Murphy1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2686-8986Cassie Thayer-Styes2https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4811-0223Chad E. Buckley3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0937-6832Anne Shelley4https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9065-5998Associate Dean for Information Assets, Milner Library, Illinois State UniversityCollection Assessment Librarian and Physics Librarian, Milner Library, Illinois State UniversityAcquisitions Librarian, Milner Library, Illinois State UniversityHead of Collection Development and Biological Sciences Librarian, Milner Library, Illinois State UniversityScholarly Communication Librarian and Music Librarian, Milner Library, Illinois State UniversityFaculty hold widely varying perspectives on the benefits and challenges afforded by open access (OA) publishing. In the United States, conversations on OA models and strategy have been dominated by scholars affiliated with Carnegie R1 institutions. This article reports findings from interviews conducted with faculty at a Carnegie R2 institution, highlighting disciplinary and individual perspectives on the high costs and rich rewards afforded by OA. The results reiterate the persistence of a high degree of skepticism regarding the quality of peer review and business models associated with OA publishing. By exploring scholars’ perceptions of and experiences with OA publishing and their comfort using or sharing unpublished, publicly available content, the authors highlight the degree to which OA approaches must remain flexible, iterative and multifaceted – no single solution can begin to accommodate the rich and varying needs of individual stakeholders.https://account.insights.uksg.org/index.php/up-j-i/article/view/620open accessscholarly communicationshigher educationcarnegie r2 universitiesacademic publishingacademic library |
spellingShingle | Rachel E. Scott Julie A. Murphy Cassie Thayer-Styes Chad E. Buckley Anne Shelley Exploring faculty perspectives on open access at a medium-sized, American doctoral university Insights: The UKSG Journal open access scholarly communications higher education carnegie r2 universities academic publishing academic library |
title | Exploring faculty perspectives on open access at a medium-sized, American doctoral university |
title_full | Exploring faculty perspectives on open access at a medium-sized, American doctoral university |
title_fullStr | Exploring faculty perspectives on open access at a medium-sized, American doctoral university |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring faculty perspectives on open access at a medium-sized, American doctoral university |
title_short | Exploring faculty perspectives on open access at a medium-sized, American doctoral university |
title_sort | exploring faculty perspectives on open access at a medium sized american doctoral university |
topic | open access scholarly communications higher education carnegie r2 universities academic publishing academic library |
url | https://account.insights.uksg.org/index.php/up-j-i/article/view/620 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rachelescott exploringfacultyperspectivesonopenaccessatamediumsizedamericandoctoraluniversity AT julieamurphy exploringfacultyperspectivesonopenaccessatamediumsizedamericandoctoraluniversity AT cassiethayerstyes exploringfacultyperspectivesonopenaccessatamediumsizedamericandoctoraluniversity AT chadebuckley exploringfacultyperspectivesonopenaccessatamediumsizedamericandoctoraluniversity AT anneshelley exploringfacultyperspectivesonopenaccessatamediumsizedamericandoctoraluniversity |