Exploring faculty perspectives on open access at a medium-sized, American doctoral university

Faculty hold widely varying perspectives on the benefits and challenges afforded by open access (OA) publishing. In the United States, conversations on OA models and strategy have been dominated by scholars affiliated with Carnegie R1 institutions. This article reports findings from interviews condu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rachel E. Scott, Julie A. Murphy, Cassie Thayer-Styes, Chad E. Buckley, Anne Shelley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2023-07-01
Series:Insights: The UKSG Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://account.insights.uksg.org/index.php/up-j-i/article/view/620
_version_ 1797748838511935488
author Rachel E. Scott
Julie A. Murphy
Cassie Thayer-Styes
Chad E. Buckley
Anne Shelley
author_facet Rachel E. Scott
Julie A. Murphy
Cassie Thayer-Styes
Chad E. Buckley
Anne Shelley
author_sort Rachel E. Scott
collection DOAJ
description Faculty hold widely varying perspectives on the benefits and challenges afforded by open access (OA) publishing. In the United States, conversations on OA models and strategy have been dominated by scholars affiliated with Carnegie R1 institutions. This article reports findings from interviews conducted with faculty at a Carnegie R2 institution, highlighting disciplinary and individual perspectives on the high costs and rich rewards afforded by OA. The results reiterate the persistence of a high degree of skepticism regarding the quality of peer review and business models associated with OA publishing. By exploring scholars’ perceptions of and experiences with OA publishing and their comfort using or sharing unpublished, publicly available content, the authors highlight the degree to which OA approaches must remain flexible, iterative and multifaceted – no single solution can begin to accommodate the rich and varying needs of individual stakeholders.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T16:10:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8ed440a582194da59989ca7cf5d423f3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2048-7754
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T16:10:37Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format Article
series Insights: The UKSG Journal
spelling doaj.art-8ed440a582194da59989ca7cf5d423f32023-08-09T14:06:57ZengUbiquity PressInsights: The UKSG Journal2048-77542023-07-0136141410.1629/uksg.620618Exploring faculty perspectives on open access at a medium-sized, American doctoral universityRachel E. Scott0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5847-3378Julie A. Murphy1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2686-8986Cassie Thayer-Styes2https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4811-0223Chad E. Buckley3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0937-6832Anne Shelley4https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9065-5998Associate Dean for Information Assets, Milner Library, Illinois State UniversityCollection Assessment Librarian and Physics Librarian, Milner Library, Illinois State UniversityAcquisitions Librarian, Milner Library, Illinois State UniversityHead of Collection Development and Biological Sciences Librarian, Milner Library, Illinois State UniversityScholarly Communication Librarian and Music Librarian, Milner Library, Illinois State UniversityFaculty hold widely varying perspectives on the benefits and challenges afforded by open access (OA) publishing. In the United States, conversations on OA models and strategy have been dominated by scholars affiliated with Carnegie R1 institutions. This article reports findings from interviews conducted with faculty at a Carnegie R2 institution, highlighting disciplinary and individual perspectives on the high costs and rich rewards afforded by OA. The results reiterate the persistence of a high degree of skepticism regarding the quality of peer review and business models associated with OA publishing. By exploring scholars’ perceptions of and experiences with OA publishing and their comfort using or sharing unpublished, publicly available content, the authors highlight the degree to which OA approaches must remain flexible, iterative and multifaceted – no single solution can begin to accommodate the rich and varying needs of individual stakeholders.https://account.insights.uksg.org/index.php/up-j-i/article/view/620open accessscholarly communicationshigher educationcarnegie r2 universitiesacademic publishingacademic library
spellingShingle Rachel E. Scott
Julie A. Murphy
Cassie Thayer-Styes
Chad E. Buckley
Anne Shelley
Exploring faculty perspectives on open access at a medium-sized, American doctoral university
Insights: The UKSG Journal
open access
scholarly communications
higher education
carnegie r2 universities
academic publishing
academic library
title Exploring faculty perspectives on open access at a medium-sized, American doctoral university
title_full Exploring faculty perspectives on open access at a medium-sized, American doctoral university
title_fullStr Exploring faculty perspectives on open access at a medium-sized, American doctoral university
title_full_unstemmed Exploring faculty perspectives on open access at a medium-sized, American doctoral university
title_short Exploring faculty perspectives on open access at a medium-sized, American doctoral university
title_sort exploring faculty perspectives on open access at a medium sized american doctoral university
topic open access
scholarly communications
higher education
carnegie r2 universities
academic publishing
academic library
url https://account.insights.uksg.org/index.php/up-j-i/article/view/620
work_keys_str_mv AT rachelescott exploringfacultyperspectivesonopenaccessatamediumsizedamericandoctoraluniversity
AT julieamurphy exploringfacultyperspectivesonopenaccessatamediumsizedamericandoctoraluniversity
AT cassiethayerstyes exploringfacultyperspectivesonopenaccessatamediumsizedamericandoctoraluniversity
AT chadebuckley exploringfacultyperspectivesonopenaccessatamediumsizedamericandoctoraluniversity
AT anneshelley exploringfacultyperspectivesonopenaccessatamediumsizedamericandoctoraluniversity