COMPare: Qualitative analysis of researchers’ responses to critical correspondence on a cohort of 58 misreported trials

COMPare: Qualitative analysis of researchers’ responses to critical correspondence on a cohort of 58 misreported trials

Abstract Background Discrepancies between pre-specified and reported outcomes are an important and prevalent source of bias in clinical trials. COMPare (Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Outcome Monitoring Project) monitored all trials in five leading journals for correct outcome reporting, submitt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ben Goldacre, Henry Drysdale, Cicely Marston, Kamal R. Mahtani, Aaron Dale, Ioan Milosevic, Eirion Slade, Philip Hartley, Carl Heneghan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-02-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Outcomes
Misreporting
Trials
CONSORT
Audit
Correction letters
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3172-3

Internet

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3172-3

Similar Items