Thinking, good and bad? Deliberative thinking and the singularity effect in charitable giving
Can deliberation increase charitable giving when giving is impulsive (i.e., a one-time small gift in response to an immediate appeal)? We conduct two studies in Israel and Sweden to compare two forms of deliberation, unguided and guided, in their ability to decrease the singularity effect (i.e., giv...
Main Authors: | Hajdi Moche, Tom Gordon-Hecker, Tehila Kogut, Daniel Västfjäll |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2022-01-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.sjdm.org/21/211026b/jdm211026b.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Reducing overhead aversion in charitable giving through information and introspection
by: Hulda Karlsson-Larsson, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Helping the child or the adult? Systematically testing the identifiable victim effect for child and adult victims
by: Hajdi Moche, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Victim identifiability, number of victims, and unit asking in charitable giving.
by: Hajdi Moche, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Others’ opinions count, but not all of them: anchoring to ingroup versus outgroup members’ behavior in charitable giving
by: Dorina Hysenbelli, et al.
Published: (2013-11-01) -
Clearing Up Charitable Giving
by: Lynda M. Spence
Published: (2018-08-01)