Integrating nutrition and obesity prevention considerations into institutional investment decisions regarding food companies: Australian investment sector perspectives

Abstract Background: There is growing recognition that current food systems are both unhealthy and unsustainable, and are increasingly shifting toward the supply and marketing of unhealthy, ultra-processed foods and beverages. Large food companies hold substantial power within food systems and prese...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ella Robinson, Christine Parker, Rachel Carey, Anita Foerster, Miranda R Blake, Gary Sacks
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-11-01
Series:Globalization and Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-022-00885-7
_version_ 1811230379689902080
author Ella Robinson
Christine Parker
Rachel Carey
Anita Foerster
Miranda R Blake
Gary Sacks
author_facet Ella Robinson
Christine Parker
Rachel Carey
Anita Foerster
Miranda R Blake
Gary Sacks
author_sort Ella Robinson
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background: There is growing recognition that current food systems are both unhealthy and unsustainable, and are increasingly shifting toward the supply and marketing of unhealthy, ultra-processed foods and beverages. Large food companies hold substantial power within food systems and present a significant barrier to progress on addressing issues related to nutrition and obesity prevention. Institutional investors (such as pension funds) play a key role in influencing corporate governance and practices, and are increasingly incorporating environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations within investment decisions. By considering nutrition and obesity prevention, institutional investors present a potential avenue for driving increased food industry accountability for their population health impact. This study investigated views of stakeholders in the Australian investment sector on the incorporation of nutrition and obesity prevention considerations within institutional investment decision-making regarding food companies. Methods: Fifteen in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted in 2020-21. Participants were predominantly Australian-based, and included representatives from asset management companies, superannuation funds, ESG advisory/consultancy firms, ESG research providers, and relevant advocacy groups. Interviews examined challenges and opportunities to the integration of nutrition and obesity prevention considerations within institutional investment decision-making. Interviews were analysed using deductive thematic analysis, informed by a theoretical change model. Results: Several participants reported that their institution factored nutrition and obesity prevention considerations into their investment decisions; however, attention to nutrition-related issues was limited, generally perceived as ‘niche’, and not yet institutionalised. Key challenges and opportunities were identified at the employee, investment organisation, investment sector, government and non-government levels. These challenges and opportunities centred around experience and knowledge, quality and availability of ESG data and benchmarks, importance of investor coalitions, and demonstration of financial risks related to nutrition and obesity. Conclusion: There are a range of steps that could be taken to help ensure more systematic and effective consideration of issues related to nutrition and obesity prevention within institutional investment decision-making in Australia, including: (1) improved nutrition-related reporting metrics and benchmarking criteria for food companies; (2) better articulation of the financial risks that unhealthy diets and obesity pose to investors; (3) enhanced investor advocacy on unhealthy diets and obesity through investor coalitions and; (4) detailed guidance for investors on how to address unhealthy diets and obesity. Better engagement between the Australian public health community, institutional investors and government regulators is critical to drive changed investor practice in this area.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T10:28:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-96df7c01bbe04147bd7a6a8e5c3cb7ed
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1744-8603
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T10:28:29Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Globalization and Health
spelling doaj.art-96df7c01bbe04147bd7a6a8e5c3cb7ed2022-12-22T03:36:55ZengBMCGlobalization and Health1744-86032022-11-0118111610.1186/s12992-022-00885-7Integrating nutrition and obesity prevention considerations into institutional investment decisions regarding food companies: Australian investment sector perspectivesElla Robinson0Christine Parker1Rachel Carey2Anita Foerster3Miranda R Blake4Gary Sacks5Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition (GLOBE), Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin UniversityMelbourne Law School, The University of MelbourneSchool of Agriculture and Food, The University of MelbourneMonash Business School, Monash UniversityGlobal Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition (GLOBE), Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin UniversityGlobal Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition (GLOBE), Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin UniversityAbstract Background: There is growing recognition that current food systems are both unhealthy and unsustainable, and are increasingly shifting toward the supply and marketing of unhealthy, ultra-processed foods and beverages. Large food companies hold substantial power within food systems and present a significant barrier to progress on addressing issues related to nutrition and obesity prevention. Institutional investors (such as pension funds) play a key role in influencing corporate governance and practices, and are increasingly incorporating environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations within investment decisions. By considering nutrition and obesity prevention, institutional investors present a potential avenue for driving increased food industry accountability for their population health impact. This study investigated views of stakeholders in the Australian investment sector on the incorporation of nutrition and obesity prevention considerations within institutional investment decision-making regarding food companies. Methods: Fifteen in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted in 2020-21. Participants were predominantly Australian-based, and included representatives from asset management companies, superannuation funds, ESG advisory/consultancy firms, ESG research providers, and relevant advocacy groups. Interviews examined challenges and opportunities to the integration of nutrition and obesity prevention considerations within institutional investment decision-making. Interviews were analysed using deductive thematic analysis, informed by a theoretical change model. Results: Several participants reported that their institution factored nutrition and obesity prevention considerations into their investment decisions; however, attention to nutrition-related issues was limited, generally perceived as ‘niche’, and not yet institutionalised. Key challenges and opportunities were identified at the employee, investment organisation, investment sector, government and non-government levels. These challenges and opportunities centred around experience and knowledge, quality and availability of ESG data and benchmarks, importance of investor coalitions, and demonstration of financial risks related to nutrition and obesity. Conclusion: There are a range of steps that could be taken to help ensure more systematic and effective consideration of issues related to nutrition and obesity prevention within institutional investment decision-making in Australia, including: (1) improved nutrition-related reporting metrics and benchmarking criteria for food companies; (2) better articulation of the financial risks that unhealthy diets and obesity pose to investors; (3) enhanced investor advocacy on unhealthy diets and obesity through investor coalitions and; (4) detailed guidance for investors on how to address unhealthy diets and obesity. Better engagement between the Australian public health community, institutional investors and government regulators is critical to drive changed investor practice in this area.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-022-00885-7Responsible investmentEnvironmental Social GovernanceObesityFood industryAccountability
spellingShingle Ella Robinson
Christine Parker
Rachel Carey
Anita Foerster
Miranda R Blake
Gary Sacks
Integrating nutrition and obesity prevention considerations into institutional investment decisions regarding food companies: Australian investment sector perspectives
Globalization and Health
Responsible investment
Environmental Social Governance
Obesity
Food industry
Accountability
title Integrating nutrition and obesity prevention considerations into institutional investment decisions regarding food companies: Australian investment sector perspectives
title_full Integrating nutrition and obesity prevention considerations into institutional investment decisions regarding food companies: Australian investment sector perspectives
title_fullStr Integrating nutrition and obesity prevention considerations into institutional investment decisions regarding food companies: Australian investment sector perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Integrating nutrition and obesity prevention considerations into institutional investment decisions regarding food companies: Australian investment sector perspectives
title_short Integrating nutrition and obesity prevention considerations into institutional investment decisions regarding food companies: Australian investment sector perspectives
title_sort integrating nutrition and obesity prevention considerations into institutional investment decisions regarding food companies australian investment sector perspectives
topic Responsible investment
Environmental Social Governance
Obesity
Food industry
Accountability
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-022-00885-7
work_keys_str_mv AT ellarobinson integratingnutritionandobesitypreventionconsiderationsintoinstitutionalinvestmentdecisionsregardingfoodcompaniesaustralianinvestmentsectorperspectives
AT christineparker integratingnutritionandobesitypreventionconsiderationsintoinstitutionalinvestmentdecisionsregardingfoodcompaniesaustralianinvestmentsectorperspectives
AT rachelcarey integratingnutritionandobesitypreventionconsiderationsintoinstitutionalinvestmentdecisionsregardingfoodcompaniesaustralianinvestmentsectorperspectives
AT anitafoerster integratingnutritionandobesitypreventionconsiderationsintoinstitutionalinvestmentdecisionsregardingfoodcompaniesaustralianinvestmentsectorperspectives
AT mirandarblake integratingnutritionandobesitypreventionconsiderationsintoinstitutionalinvestmentdecisionsregardingfoodcompaniesaustralianinvestmentsectorperspectives
AT garysacks integratingnutritionandobesitypreventionconsiderationsintoinstitutionalinvestmentdecisionsregardingfoodcompaniesaustralianinvestmentsectorperspectives