How Well Do Results From Randomized Clinical Trials and/or Recommendations for Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillator Programming Diffuse Into Clinical Practice?<subtitle>Translation Assessed in a National Cohort of Patients With Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators (ALTITUDE)</subtitle>

How Well Do Results From Randomized Clinical Trials and/or Recommendations for Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillator Programming Diffuse Into Clinical Practice?<subtitle>Translation Assessed in a National Cohort of Patients With Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators (ALTITUDE)</subtitle>

Background Inappropriate implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator programming can be detrimental. Whether trials/recommendations informing best implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator programming (high‐rate cutoff and/or extended duration of detection) influence practice is unknown. Methods and Results...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Niraj Varma, Paul Jones, Nicholas Wold, Edmond Cronin, Kenneth Stein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-02-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
guideline adherence
guidelines
implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator
programming
remote monitoring
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.117.007392

Internet

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.117.007392

Similar Items