Power, agency, deference and difference Examining the politics of composer–performer relationships in the wake of recent innovations
With a view to uncovering the political implications of notational, technological and musical innovation in composer–performer relationships within Western art music, this paper examines three disparate works: Christian Wolff’s Duo for Pianists II (1958); Brian Ferneyhough’s Unity Capsule (1975); an...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Huddersfield Press
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Fields |
Online Access: | https://www.fieldsjournal.org.uk/article/id/436/ |
_version_ | 1797815115689492480 |
---|---|
author | John Aulich |
author_facet | John Aulich |
author_sort | John Aulich |
collection | DOAJ |
description | With a view to uncovering the political implications of notational, technological and musical innovation in composer–performer relationships within Western art music, this paper examines three disparate works: Christian Wolff’s Duo for Pianists II (1958); Brian Ferneyhough’s Unity Capsule (1975); and Georg Hajdu’s Schwer… unheimlich Schwer (2009). By first exploring two innovative 20th century works, Duo for Pianists II and Unity Capsule, the paper establishes a framework for a discussion of the political and ethical dimensions of composer–performer relationships in relation to the 21st century innovation manifest in Schwer… unheimlich Schwer (2009). This multidimensional examination draws on Warren’s (2014) examination of the relationships between ethics and music, Godlovitch’s (1998) philosophy of performance, and research carried out by practitioners such as Couroux (2002), Schick (2006) and Eigenfeldt (2011; 2014). The paper concludes that all three pieces demonstrate the potential for notation to have strong political implications, and that composers are ultimately responsible for the political implications of the performance experience. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-13T08:17:55Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-99e837244a144ca5a6aa54d86d42b91b |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2057-0163 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-13T08:17:55Z |
publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
publisher | University of Huddersfield Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Fields |
spelling | doaj.art-99e837244a144ca5a6aa54d86d42b91b2023-05-31T13:50:35ZengUniversity of Huddersfield PressFields2057-01632016-01-012110.5920/fields.2016.2116Power, agency, deference and difference Examining the politics of composer–performer relationships in the wake of recent innovationsJohn Aulich0University of HuddersfieldWith a view to uncovering the political implications of notational, technological and musical innovation in composer–performer relationships within Western art music, this paper examines three disparate works: Christian Wolff’s Duo for Pianists II (1958); Brian Ferneyhough’s Unity Capsule (1975); and Georg Hajdu’s Schwer… unheimlich Schwer (2009). By first exploring two innovative 20th century works, Duo for Pianists II and Unity Capsule, the paper establishes a framework for a discussion of the political and ethical dimensions of composer–performer relationships in relation to the 21st century innovation manifest in Schwer… unheimlich Schwer (2009). This multidimensional examination draws on Warren’s (2014) examination of the relationships between ethics and music, Godlovitch’s (1998) philosophy of performance, and research carried out by practitioners such as Couroux (2002), Schick (2006) and Eigenfeldt (2011; 2014). The paper concludes that all three pieces demonstrate the potential for notation to have strong political implications, and that composers are ultimately responsible for the political implications of the performance experience.https://www.fieldsjournal.org.uk/article/id/436/ |
spellingShingle | John Aulich Power, agency, deference and difference Examining the politics of composer–performer relationships in the wake of recent innovations Fields |
title | Power, agency, deference and difference Examining the politics of composer–performer relationships in the wake of recent innovations |
title_full | Power, agency, deference and difference Examining the politics of composer–performer relationships in the wake of recent innovations |
title_fullStr | Power, agency, deference and difference Examining the politics of composer–performer relationships in the wake of recent innovations |
title_full_unstemmed | Power, agency, deference and difference Examining the politics of composer–performer relationships in the wake of recent innovations |
title_short | Power, agency, deference and difference Examining the politics of composer–performer relationships in the wake of recent innovations |
title_sort | power agency deference and difference examining the politics of composer performer relationships in the wake of recent innovations |
url | https://www.fieldsjournal.org.uk/article/id/436/ |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnaulich poweragencydeferenceanddifferenceexaminingthepoliticsofcomposerperformerrelationshipsinthewakeofrecentinnovations |