L’argumentation dans les recours en révision au Grand Conseil de Malines : une distinction estompée entre « fait » et « droit » ?
The sixteenth-century procedural remedy of review (revisio, révision, revisie) against judgments of the Great Council of Mechlin was deemed to be open only when a party challenged the judges’ findings on facts, claiming that the decision was based on an erroneous assessment of the facts of the case....
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Association Clio et Themis
2021-06-01
|
| Series: | Clio@Themis |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/cliothemis/1431 |