A Constitutionally Momentous Judgment That Changes Practically Nothing?

<p>The Supreme Court’s judgment in Cherry/Miller (No 2) that the prorogation of Parliament was unlawful, null and of no effect was a bold move as a matter of public law. It represents a constitutional court willing to assert its authority as guardian of the constitution. But although potential...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michael Wilkinson
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
Series:Verfassungsblog
Subjects:
Online Access:https://verfassungsblog.de/a-constitutionally-momentous-judgment-that-changes-practically-nothing/