A Constitutionally Momentous Judgment That Changes Practically Nothing?
<p>The Supreme Court’s judgment in Cherry/Miller (No 2) that the prorogation of Parliament was unlawful, null and of no effect was a bold move as a matter of public law. It represents a constitutional court willing to assert its authority as guardian of the constitution. But although potential...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
|
Series: | Verfassungsblog |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://verfassungsblog.de/a-constitutionally-momentous-judgment-that-changes-practically-nothing/ |
Summary: | <p>The Supreme Court’s judgment in Cherry/Miller (No 2) that the prorogation of Parliament was unlawful, null and of no effect was a bold move as a matter of public law. It represents a constitutional court willing to assert its authority as guardian of the constitution. But although potentially of long-term constitutional moment, it changes very little with regard to the fundamental constitutional and political issue of Britain’s membership of the European Union.</p>
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 2366-7044 |