A Constitutionally Momentous Judgment That Changes Practically Nothing?
<p>The Supreme Court’s judgment in Cherry/Miller (No 2) that the prorogation of Parliament was unlawful, null and of no effect was a bold move as a matter of public law. It represents a constitutional court willing to assert its authority as guardian of the constitution. But although potential...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
|
| Series: | Verfassungsblog |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://verfassungsblog.de/a-constitutionally-momentous-judgment-that-changes-practically-nothing/ |
| _version_ | 1811287510105456640 |
|---|---|
| author | Michael Wilkinson |
| author_facet | Michael Wilkinson |
| author_sort | Michael Wilkinson |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>The Supreme Court’s judgment in Cherry/Miller (No 2) that the prorogation of Parliament was unlawful, null and of no effect was a bold move as a matter of public law. It represents a constitutional court willing to assert its authority as guardian of the constitution. But although potentially of long-term constitutional moment, it changes very little with regard to the fundamental constitutional and political issue of Britain’s membership of the European Union.</p>
|
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T03:18:36Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-9c329e9c404b4649bc6b8e1174ba5d99 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2366-7044 |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T03:18:36Z |
| publisher | Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Verfassungsblog |
| spelling | doaj.art-9c329e9c404b4649bc6b8e1174ba5d992022-12-22T03:04:49ZdeuMax Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbHVerfassungsblog2366-70442366-7044A Constitutionally Momentous Judgment That Changes Practically Nothing?Michael Wilkinson<p>The Supreme Court’s judgment in Cherry/Miller (No 2) that the prorogation of Parliament was unlawful, null and of no effect was a bold move as a matter of public law. It represents a constitutional court willing to assert its authority as guardian of the constitution. But although potentially of long-term constitutional moment, it changes very little with regard to the fundamental constitutional and political issue of Britain’s membership of the European Union.</p> https://verfassungsblog.de/a-constitutionally-momentous-judgment-that-changes-practically-nothing/prorogation, separation of powers, UK Supreme Court |
| spellingShingle | Michael Wilkinson A Constitutionally Momentous Judgment That Changes Practically Nothing? Verfassungsblog prorogation, separation of powers, UK Supreme Court |
| title | A Constitutionally Momentous Judgment That Changes Practically Nothing? |
| title_full | A Constitutionally Momentous Judgment That Changes Practically Nothing? |
| title_fullStr | A Constitutionally Momentous Judgment That Changes Practically Nothing? |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Constitutionally Momentous Judgment That Changes Practically Nothing? |
| title_short | A Constitutionally Momentous Judgment That Changes Practically Nothing? |
| title_sort | constitutionally momentous judgment that changes practically nothing |
| topic | prorogation, separation of powers, UK Supreme Court |
| url | https://verfassungsblog.de/a-constitutionally-momentous-judgment-that-changes-practically-nothing/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT michaelwilkinson aconstitutionallymomentousjudgmentthatchangespracticallynothing AT michaelwilkinson constitutionallymomentousjudgmentthatchangespracticallynothing |