A Constitutionally Momentous Judgment That Changes Practically Nothing?
<p>The Supreme Court’s judgment in Cherry/Miller (No 2) that the prorogation of Parliament was unlawful, null and of no effect was a bold move as a matter of public law. It represents a constitutional court willing to assert its authority as guardian of the constitution. But although potential...
Main Author: | Michael Wilkinson |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
|
Series: | Verfassungsblog |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://verfassungsblog.de/a-constitutionally-momentous-judgment-that-changes-practically-nothing/ |
Similar Items
-
Where Power Lies or Where Power Lied?
by: Joelle Grogan -
The UK Constitution and Brexit – Five Brief External Observations
by: Alexander Thiele -
Universalization of Democratic Constitutionalism and The Work of Constitutional Courts Today
by: Jimly Asshiddiqie
Published: (2016-03-01) -
A Paean to Judicial (Self) Restraint
by: Devyani Prabhat -
A Second Scottish Independence Referendum in the UK Supreme Court
by: Sionaidh Douglas-Scott
Published: (2022-10-01)