Evaluation of Different Chemical and Physical Components of Milk in Cows, Buffalos, Sheep, and Goats

In recent years, the consumption of milk and dairy products has dramatically increased in several parts of the world. Different livestock plays an essential role in global milk production. This study was designed to evaluate different chemical and physical components of milk in four groups of livest...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M Abdulwahid Jaber Al-Fayad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute 2022-02-01
Series:Archives of Razi Institute
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archrazi.areeo.ac.ir/article_125513_a144ea446c14406b4fb3388d9132ce87.pdf
_version_ 1818117326084505600
author M Abdulwahid Jaber Al-Fayad
author_facet M Abdulwahid Jaber Al-Fayad
author_sort M Abdulwahid Jaber Al-Fayad
collection DOAJ
description In recent years, the consumption of milk and dairy products has dramatically increased in several parts of the world. Different livestock plays an essential role in global milk production. This study was designed to evaluate different chemical and physical components of milk in four groups of livestock, including cows, buffalos, sheep, and goats. To this end, 200 raw milk samples were collected from cows, buffalos, sheep, and goats (n=50) across Dhi-Qar Governorate, Iraq, for a period of one year (from 01.10.2018 to 01.06.2019). The findings showed sheep and buffalos’ milk samples had a significantly higher percentage of total solids (TS%), compared to cows and goats’ milk samples (P<0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the TS% between sheep and buffalos’ milk samples. Furthermore, the mean TS% values in cows, buffalos, sheep, and goats’ milk samples were determined at 11.14%, 12.87%, 13.26%, and 11.33%, respectively. As for fat percentage (F%), buffalos’ milk samples had significantly higher F% (4.80%), compared to milk samples of cows, sheep, and goats (P<0.05). Additionally, sheep’s milk samples had significantly higher F% (P<0.05) than cows and goats’ milk samples determined at 2.78%, 4.20%, and 2.98%, respectively. The findings showed the percentage of solids not fat (SNF%) was significantly higher in sheep’s milk (8.97%), compared to milk samples of cows, buffalos, and goats (P<0.05). Additionally, it was found that the SNF% was significantly higher (P<0.05) in Buffalos’ milk samples, compared to cows and goats’ milk samples determined at 8.36%, 8.60%, and 8.35%, respectively. Moreover, the results revealed that the percentage of milk protein content in sheep’s milk was significantly higher than the cows, buffalos, and goats’ milk (P<0.05). Recorded data also showed no significant differences in the percentage of milk lactose among cows, buffalos, sheep, and goats’ milk samples (P<0.05). Furthermore, the findings illustrated that the percentage of milk ash (Ash%) in sheep’s milk samples was significantly higher than the cows, buffalos, as well as goats’ milk samples (P<0.05), and no significant differences were observed among cows, buffalos, and goats’ milk samples in the Ash% (P<0.05). In addition, there were no significant differences in the specific gravity among different milk samples (P<0.05). Finally, the results displayed no significant differences between cows and goats’ milk samples in all the studied traits (P<0.05).
first_indexed 2024-12-11T04:36:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9f4b954f3f4d462784ec1227d89dd958
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0365-3439
2008-9872
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T04:36:38Z
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute
record_format Article
series Archives of Razi Institute
spelling doaj.art-9f4b954f3f4d462784ec1227d89dd9582022-12-22T01:20:44ZengRazi Vaccine and Serum Research InstituteArchives of Razi Institute0365-34392008-98722022-02-0177147748110.22092/ari.2021.356861.1932125513Evaluation of Different Chemical and Physical Components of Milk in Cows, Buffalos, Sheep, and GoatsM Abdulwahid Jaber Al-Fayad0Faculty of Agriculture and Marshlands, University of Thi-Qar, Nasiriyah, IraqIn recent years, the consumption of milk and dairy products has dramatically increased in several parts of the world. Different livestock plays an essential role in global milk production. This study was designed to evaluate different chemical and physical components of milk in four groups of livestock, including cows, buffalos, sheep, and goats. To this end, 200 raw milk samples were collected from cows, buffalos, sheep, and goats (n=50) across Dhi-Qar Governorate, Iraq, for a period of one year (from 01.10.2018 to 01.06.2019). The findings showed sheep and buffalos’ milk samples had a significantly higher percentage of total solids (TS%), compared to cows and goats’ milk samples (P<0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the TS% between sheep and buffalos’ milk samples. Furthermore, the mean TS% values in cows, buffalos, sheep, and goats’ milk samples were determined at 11.14%, 12.87%, 13.26%, and 11.33%, respectively. As for fat percentage (F%), buffalos’ milk samples had significantly higher F% (4.80%), compared to milk samples of cows, sheep, and goats (P<0.05). Additionally, sheep’s milk samples had significantly higher F% (P<0.05) than cows and goats’ milk samples determined at 2.78%, 4.20%, and 2.98%, respectively. The findings showed the percentage of solids not fat (SNF%) was significantly higher in sheep’s milk (8.97%), compared to milk samples of cows, buffalos, and goats (P<0.05). Additionally, it was found that the SNF% was significantly higher (P<0.05) in Buffalos’ milk samples, compared to cows and goats’ milk samples determined at 8.36%, 8.60%, and 8.35%, respectively. Moreover, the results revealed that the percentage of milk protein content in sheep’s milk was significantly higher than the cows, buffalos, and goats’ milk (P<0.05). Recorded data also showed no significant differences in the percentage of milk lactose among cows, buffalos, sheep, and goats’ milk samples (P<0.05). Furthermore, the findings illustrated that the percentage of milk ash (Ash%) in sheep’s milk samples was significantly higher than the cows, buffalos, as well as goats’ milk samples (P<0.05), and no significant differences were observed among cows, buffalos, and goats’ milk samples in the Ash% (P<0.05). In addition, there were no significant differences in the specific gravity among different milk samples (P<0.05). Finally, the results displayed no significant differences between cows and goats’ milk samples in all the studied traits (P<0.05).https://archrazi.areeo.ac.ir/article_125513_a144ea446c14406b4fb3388d9132ce87.pdfanimal typebuffaloscowssheeptotal solids
spellingShingle M Abdulwahid Jaber Al-Fayad
Evaluation of Different Chemical and Physical Components of Milk in Cows, Buffalos, Sheep, and Goats
Archives of Razi Institute
animal type
buffalos
cows
sheep
total solids
title Evaluation of Different Chemical and Physical Components of Milk in Cows, Buffalos, Sheep, and Goats
title_full Evaluation of Different Chemical and Physical Components of Milk in Cows, Buffalos, Sheep, and Goats
title_fullStr Evaluation of Different Chemical and Physical Components of Milk in Cows, Buffalos, Sheep, and Goats
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Different Chemical and Physical Components of Milk in Cows, Buffalos, Sheep, and Goats
title_short Evaluation of Different Chemical and Physical Components of Milk in Cows, Buffalos, Sheep, and Goats
title_sort evaluation of different chemical and physical components of milk in cows buffalos sheep and goats
topic animal type
buffalos
cows
sheep
total solids
url https://archrazi.areeo.ac.ir/article_125513_a144ea446c14406b4fb3388d9132ce87.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mabdulwahidjaberalfayad evaluationofdifferentchemicalandphysicalcomponentsofmilkincowsbuffalossheepandgoats