The standard setting process: validating interpretations of stakeholders
Abstract Background Stakeholders’ interpretations of the findings of large-scale educational assessments can influence important decisions. In the context of educational assessment, standard-setting remains an especially critical element, because it is complex and largely unstandardized. Instruments...
Main Authors: | Nele Kampa, Helene Wagner, Olaf Köller |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2019-02-01
|
Series: | Large-scale Assessments in Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40536-019-0071-8 |
Similar Items
-
Comparison of the validity of bookmark and Angoff standard setting methods in medical performance tests
by: Majid Yousefi Afrashteh
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Standard setting anchor statements: a double cross-over trial of two different methods
by: Steven Burr, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01) -
Do We Know Who the Person With the Borderline Score is, in Standard-Setting and Decision-Making
by: Andrew S. Lane, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Using the Angoff method to set a standard on mock exams for the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination
by: Mi Kyoung Yim, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01) -
Standard Setting for Objective Structured Clinical Exam Using Four Methods: Prefixed score Angoff Borderline Regression and Cohens
by: Mohammad Jalili, et al.
Published: (2012-07-01)