The Rejection of Teaching in Philosophy. Deleuze, Nietzsche, and Stirner
The problematic of education in philosophy is related to the question of reproduction, progression, and transfer of knowledge. In the paper, I examine the Deleuzian interpretation of Nietzschean philosophy. I argue that such philosophy in a certain sense radically rejects teaching in philosophy. The...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Institute Nova Revija for the Humanities
2019-12-01
|
| Series: | Phainomena |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.phainomena.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/13_E-PHI_28_110-111-Kalu%C5%BEa.pdf |
| _version_ | 1811211066476068864 |
|---|---|
| author | Jernej Kaluža |
| author_facet | Jernej Kaluža |
| author_sort | Jernej Kaluža |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The problematic of education in philosophy is related to the question of reproduction, progression, and transfer of knowledge. In the paper, I examine the Deleuzian interpretation of Nietzschean philosophy. I argue that such philosophy in a certain sense radically rejects teaching in philosophy. The rejection is driven by the recognition that mediation of thought often presents the enforcement of a particular thought. Such thought represents itself as being universal, even if it is merely an expression of particular interest, type or form of living. According to Deleuze, Nietzsche rejected such a dogmatic image of thought and established thought as a singular expression of a concrete living individuum, who resists the enforced universalism of thought (morality, common sense, universal truth). This can be compared with the philosophy of Stirner. Despite the similarities, I argue that the final aim of resistance to teaching is in Deleuze’s version of Nietzsche exactly the opposite as in Stirner: the aim is not the establishment of a nihilistic, in itself enclosed self. On the contrary, the aim is a radical opening of the self towards the outside. This opening is in the conclusion of the paper described with Deleuze’s understanding of the learning process. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T05:06:25Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-a3272649254440c285fd978e903e08ea |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1318-3362 2232-6650 |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T05:06:25Z |
| publishDate | 2019-12-01 |
| publisher | Institute Nova Revija for the Humanities |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Phainomena |
| spelling | doaj.art-a3272649254440c285fd978e903e08ea2022-12-22T03:46:52ZdeuInstitute Nova Revija for the HumanitiesPhainomena1318-33622232-66502019-12-0128110-11127930610.32022/PHI28.2019.110-111.13The Rejection of Teaching in Philosophy. Deleuze, Nietzsche, and StirnerJernej Kaluža0Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vedeThe problematic of education in philosophy is related to the question of reproduction, progression, and transfer of knowledge. In the paper, I examine the Deleuzian interpretation of Nietzschean philosophy. I argue that such philosophy in a certain sense radically rejects teaching in philosophy. The rejection is driven by the recognition that mediation of thought often presents the enforcement of a particular thought. Such thought represents itself as being universal, even if it is merely an expression of particular interest, type or form of living. According to Deleuze, Nietzsche rejected such a dogmatic image of thought and established thought as a singular expression of a concrete living individuum, who resists the enforced universalism of thought (morality, common sense, universal truth). This can be compared with the philosophy of Stirner. Despite the similarities, I argue that the final aim of resistance to teaching is in Deleuze’s version of Nietzsche exactly the opposite as in Stirner: the aim is not the establishment of a nihilistic, in itself enclosed self. On the contrary, the aim is a radical opening of the self towards the outside. This opening is in the conclusion of the paper described with Deleuze’s understanding of the learning process. https://www.phainomena.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/13_E-PHI_28_110-111-Kalu%C5%BEa.pdfdeleuzenietzschestirnerphilosophical teachingimage of thought |
| spellingShingle | Jernej Kaluža The Rejection of Teaching in Philosophy. Deleuze, Nietzsche, and Stirner Phainomena deleuze nietzsche stirner philosophical teaching image of thought |
| title | The Rejection of Teaching in Philosophy. Deleuze, Nietzsche, and Stirner |
| title_full | The Rejection of Teaching in Philosophy. Deleuze, Nietzsche, and Stirner |
| title_fullStr | The Rejection of Teaching in Philosophy. Deleuze, Nietzsche, and Stirner |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Rejection of Teaching in Philosophy. Deleuze, Nietzsche, and Stirner |
| title_short | The Rejection of Teaching in Philosophy. Deleuze, Nietzsche, and Stirner |
| title_sort | rejection of teaching in philosophy deleuze nietzsche and stirner |
| topic | deleuze nietzsche stirner philosophical teaching image of thought |
| url | https://www.phainomena.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/13_E-PHI_28_110-111-Kalu%C5%BEa.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jernejkaluza therejectionofteachinginphilosophydeleuzenietzscheandstirner AT jernejkaluza rejectionofteachinginphilosophydeleuzenietzscheandstirner |