Open Inquiry versus Broadly Relevant Short-Term Research Experiences for Non-Biology Majors

Undergraduate student participation in course-based research experiences results in many positive outcomes, but there is a lack of evidence demonstrating which elements of a research experience are necessary, especially for non-biology majors. Broad relevance is one element that can be logistically...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sadie Hebert, Jessamina Blum, Deena Wassenberg, David Marks, Kate Barry, Sehoya Cotner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Society for Microbiology 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
Online Access:https://jmbesubmissions.asm.org/index.php/jmbe/article/view/2167
_version_ 1818330162975997952
author Sadie Hebert
Jessamina Blum
Deena Wassenberg
David Marks
Kate Barry
Sehoya Cotner
author_facet Sadie Hebert
Jessamina Blum
Deena Wassenberg
David Marks
Kate Barry
Sehoya Cotner
author_sort Sadie Hebert
collection DOAJ
description Undergraduate student participation in course-based research experiences results in many positive outcomes, but there is a lack of evidence demonstrating which elements of a research experience are necessary, especially for non-biology majors. Broad relevance is one element that can be logistically challenging to incorporate into research experiences in large-enrollment courses. We investigated the impacts of broad relevance in a short-term research experience in an introductory biology course for non-majors. Students either participated in an open-inquiry research experience (OI‑RE) where students developed their own research question, or a broadly relevant research experience (BR-RE) where students investigated a question assigned to them that was relevant to an ongoing research project. We found a significant association between the type of research project experienced and students’ preference for an experience with half of the students in the OI-RE group and nearly all students in the BR-RE group preferring a broadly relevant research experience. However, since science confidence increased over the course for both groups, these findings indicate that while students who participated in a BR-RE valued it, broadly relevant research experiences may not be necessary for positive outcomes for non-majors.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T12:59:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-a57b8e21481e4c499962c2d02ea91f8e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1935-7877
1935-7885
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T12:59:35Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format Article
series Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
spelling doaj.art-a57b8e21481e4c499962c2d02ea91f8e2022-12-21T23:45:04ZengAmerican Society for MicrobiologyJournal of Microbiology & Biology Education1935-78771935-78852021-01-0122110.1128/jmbe.v22i1.2167Open Inquiry versus Broadly Relevant Short-Term Research Experiences for Non-Biology MajorsSadie Hebert0Jessamina Blum1Deena Wassenberg2David Marks3Kate Barry4Sehoya Cotner5University of MinnesotaUniversity of MinnesotaUniversity of MinnesotaUniversity of MinnesotaUniversity of MinnesotaUniversity of MinnesotaUndergraduate student participation in course-based research experiences results in many positive outcomes, but there is a lack of evidence demonstrating which elements of a research experience are necessary, especially for non-biology majors. Broad relevance is one element that can be logistically challenging to incorporate into research experiences in large-enrollment courses. We investigated the impacts of broad relevance in a short-term research experience in an introductory biology course for non-majors. Students either participated in an open-inquiry research experience (OI‑RE) where students developed their own research question, or a broadly relevant research experience (BR-RE) where students investigated a question assigned to them that was relevant to an ongoing research project. We found a significant association between the type of research project experienced and students’ preference for an experience with half of the students in the OI-RE group and nearly all students in the BR-RE group preferring a broadly relevant research experience. However, since science confidence increased over the course for both groups, these findings indicate that while students who participated in a BR-RE valued it, broadly relevant research experiences may not be necessary for positive outcomes for non-majors.https://jmbesubmissions.asm.org/index.php/jmbe/article/view/2167
spellingShingle Sadie Hebert
Jessamina Blum
Deena Wassenberg
David Marks
Kate Barry
Sehoya Cotner
Open Inquiry versus Broadly Relevant Short-Term Research Experiences for Non-Biology Majors
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
title Open Inquiry versus Broadly Relevant Short-Term Research Experiences for Non-Biology Majors
title_full Open Inquiry versus Broadly Relevant Short-Term Research Experiences for Non-Biology Majors
title_fullStr Open Inquiry versus Broadly Relevant Short-Term Research Experiences for Non-Biology Majors
title_full_unstemmed Open Inquiry versus Broadly Relevant Short-Term Research Experiences for Non-Biology Majors
title_short Open Inquiry versus Broadly Relevant Short-Term Research Experiences for Non-Biology Majors
title_sort open inquiry versus broadly relevant short term research experiences for non biology majors
url https://jmbesubmissions.asm.org/index.php/jmbe/article/view/2167
work_keys_str_mv AT sadiehebert openinquiryversusbroadlyrelevantshorttermresearchexperiencesfornonbiologymajors
AT jessaminablum openinquiryversusbroadlyrelevantshorttermresearchexperiencesfornonbiologymajors
AT deenawassenberg openinquiryversusbroadlyrelevantshorttermresearchexperiencesfornonbiologymajors
AT davidmarks openinquiryversusbroadlyrelevantshorttermresearchexperiencesfornonbiologymajors
AT katebarry openinquiryversusbroadlyrelevantshorttermresearchexperiencesfornonbiologymajors
AT sehoyacotner openinquiryversusbroadlyrelevantshorttermresearchexperiencesfornonbiologymajors